Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
First Try At Panning... Sufficient Quality?  
User currently offlineWalter2222 From Belgium, joined Sep 2005, 1303 posts, RR: 28
Posted (8 years 6 months 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2285 times:

Hi there,

I have just put this one in the queue:


http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...060617_CRW_5025_RT8_WVB_1200px.jpg

Does it have enough quality to stay in the queue? It was my first attempt with panning...

Any comments welcome!


This is one from my personnal site:

http://walter2219.fotopic.net/p30698168.html

Would this have a chance or would it be rejected for partially "backlit" (and other NOA's)?

Thanks for ant feedback!


Regards,

Walter


canon 340d ;-) - EFS10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM - EFS18-55mm - EF28-105mm f3.5/4.5 - EF100-400mm f4.5-5.6l is usm - ...
5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAero145 From Iceland, joined Jan 2005, 3071 posts, RR: 18
Reply 1, posted (8 years 6 months 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2278 times:

I'd say the panning shot is blurry. Backlit isn't really making it better.
The second has a very much amount of grain, and is backlit.

I'd pull the panning shout out.

-David


User currently offline9VSPO From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (8 years 6 months 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2278 times:

Quoting Walter2222 (Thread starter):
Any comments welcome!

I would say a bit of sharpening is needed Walter. Looks a bit soft to me.


User currently offlineKukkudrill From Malta, joined Dec 2004, 1123 posts, RR: 4
Reply 3, posted (8 years 6 months 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2267 times:

The Hunter looks slightly blurred in the nose area and the drop tanks (panned shots often turn out blurred in one place and sharp elsewhere - at least that's been my experience). I would reduce the photo to 1024 pixels width and apply a little more sharpening to the areas in question. I would also rotate the photo slightly counter-clockwise.

I'm not sure about the Fat Albert photo. Could be borderline backlit, but I'd take a chance and upload if this was the only concern. However, the undersides of the aircraft look rather noisy: when you lighten an underexposed area it often brings out the noise. The starboard wing leading and trailing edges also look like they need a bit of selective sharpening.



Make the most of the available light ... a lesson of photography that applies to life
User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 51
Reply 4, posted (8 years 6 months 3 days ago) and read 2228 times:

First one is blurry, second one would fall to 'quality'.

User currently offlineWalter2222 From Belgium, joined Sep 2005, 1303 posts, RR: 28
Reply 5, posted (8 years 6 months 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 2169 times:

Hi All,

Thanks for the feedback!

I will just keep them in my personal site and pull it from the queue.

Best regards,

Walter



canon 340d ;-) - EFS10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM - EFS18-55mm - EF28-105mm f3.5/4.5 - EF100-400mm f4.5-5.6l is usm - ...
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
First Try At A Moon Shot: Some Tips? posted Sun Mar 9 2003 21:13:17 by KLAX
First Attempts At Dusk/night - Your Opinions Pls posted Wed Oct 11 2006 18:26:29 by Acontador
First Try With My New K100D posted Tue Aug 29 2006 17:47:40 by Schreiner
First Reject For Contrast , Now Quality And Color posted Sun Jul 30 2006 01:37:46 by Walter2222
Ready For My First Try With A DSLR posted Fri Jun 30 2006 05:54:47 by N723GW
First Attempt At RAW. Help Please posted Mon Apr 10 2006 00:23:27 by Cosec59
Thoughts On My First Attempt At A Cockpit Shot posted Mon Jan 16 2006 06:54:14 by Uniuniunium
LH343 At YYZ Bad Quality? posted Sun Nov 21 2004 22:52:06 by AirbusfanYYZ
My First Tries At Night Shots posted Thu Mar 4 2004 17:29:34 by Spotterboy
Critique Request-First Attempt At Upload posted Tue Jan 7 2003 01:09:40 by Hurricane