Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Queue Processing...  
User currently offlineA380-200 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (13 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1202 times:


Not a complaint...just a query.

I have recently undergone a change of email address - ouch!!!

I have some 13 shots in the queue that were added with the old email address. They have been in the queue for several weeks now.

I also had a shot in the queue (some 200 photographers behind the other shots) added last week with my new email address.

As I now have all my shots in the database updated to my new email address I am unable to track the progress of the shots added with the old email address. I have though been tracking the recently added shot and as of last night (Sep 4th 2001) it had moved a few steps nearer the front of the queue...but still had some 350 photographers before it in the queue.

Last night I added another shot that was then also (with the shot added last week) some 350 photographers away from the front of the queue.

The strange thing is I received notification this morning (Sep 5th 2001) that the shot I added last night had been added to the database. There was no mention of the shot added last week and the stats page shows this still in the queue with some 350 photographers before it.

I suspect the other 13 shots added under the old email address are also still in the queue.

I'm confused.

Anyone (Screeners/Admin/Johan/Photographers) care to comment and explain how this might have happened?

Cheers,
Dean

6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSukhoi From Sweden, joined May 2006, 373 posts, RR: 8
Reply 1, posted (13 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 1155 times:

Dean,

I had 30ish pictures in the queue last night and only had 20 or so added, checking the upload queue this morning shows 10 still waiting in line. Likewise two I uploaded last night (Spit and Harrier) were added over night

Regards

Paul


User currently offlineScreener4 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (13 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 1132 times:

It's possible that your newly added photos were so good that they were checked as "high quality" by the person who screened them. Johan has told us that he is going to start paying special attention to these shots, so it's possible that he has been through and added shots that we have marked out as "high quality" before others that are in the main queue. But as it was him that did added these shots and not me, I can't confirm this - it's just a possibility.

User currently offlineChris28_17 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 1439 posts, RR: 10
Reply 3, posted (13 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 1114 times:

Same thing with me, i had one picture in the Q for like 2 weeks and added an old picture last night (pretty good i guess) and it was added this morning... i was wondering about that, its kinda cool i guess... (the other one still in the queue)


CHRIS


User currently offlineSonic99 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (13 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 1103 times:


S4,

Is that (high quality option) a new feature available to the screeners?

Stephan


User currently offlineScreener4 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (13 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day ago) and read 1096 times:

The screeners have had the option to mark a photo as "high quality" for a little while now. The idea is that when Johan is satisfied that all the pics marked as high quality by us meet his acceptance standards, he will be able to add these without further review of them. This is also the first step towards the screeners adding photos to the database ourselves, although I feel that this is still some way off.

S4


User currently offlineA380-200 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (13 years 2 months 3 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 1074 times:


Thanks for the info S4.

Sounds like a worthwhile feature to me.

Cheers,
Dean


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Congratulations To The Screeners For The LOW Queue posted Thu Feb 19 2009 07:21:19 by NicolasRubio
Queue Limit Problem posted Wed Jan 28 2009 00:52:59 by DLH405heavy
Screening Queue posted Sun Jan 25 2009 23:49:24 by Paulinbna
Uploading And The Queue posted Sun Jan 4 2009 02:49:49 by Beechcraft
The Year Is Coming To An End.....the Queue Too posted Sun Dec 21 2008 14:27:30 by AKE0404AR
Good Software For Image Processing? posted Wed Dec 10 2008 10:37:26 by Phoenix9
Help Processing A Rare Image posted Fri Dec 5 2008 04:43:20 by JakTrax
Canon Raw Processing Using PS3 posted Sat Nov 22 2008 09:45:54 by Rtl
Queue Sorted, Confidence Back? posted Wed Aug 20 2008 09:20:39 by JakTrax
A Queue Question: The Best Time To Upload? posted Tue Aug 19 2008 23:30:51 by Whappeh