Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Your Thoughts On These LAX Approach Shots?  
User currently offlineAirplanenut From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 655 posts, RR: 0
Posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 4935 times:

I was at LAX for a short time yesteray, and came up with these. I'd like your opinions on any/all, especially with advice on how to improve them. I've started toying around with editing layers, instead of just an original, and I hope this has improved the end result. I finally just got shot of a moving plane accepted, so I hope it's a sign of what's to come  Smile


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Jeremy Katz



1- Southwest 737... light was good for this one... I really like it

2- Private Jet---cute little plane for LAX  Smile

3- US Airways A320

4- United Express Embraer Brasila

5- Air Tran 737-700

6- ATA 737-800--I think this might be a bit too soft

7- American Eagle Saab 340

8- Southwest 737-700--Too soft?

9- Another Southwest bluebird

10- Southwest 737--Is this considered properly centered?

11- United Express CRJ



I'm hoping to spend a full day at LAX soon, so the more I can learn beforehand, the better  Smile

Thanks!

Jeremy


Why yes, in fact, I am a rocket scientist...
11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently onlineWakeTurbulence From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 1294 posts, RR: 16
Reply 1, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 4933 times:

I scanned through all the shots and right now I don't think any would be accepted. Some are closer than others, but the overall quality still seems to be lacking. Most of the pictures had a soft appearance to me, and some could use some brightness/contrast adjustments. You are on the right track though.
-Matt



Jetwash Images - Feel the Heat!!!
User currently offlineAirKas1 From Netherlands, joined Dec 2003, 3992 posts, RR: 55
Reply 2, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 4926 times:

1. Soft
2. Blurry
3. Not a bad attempt, but also a bit blurry?
4. Nose is blurred
5. Good one! Dunno if it will pass the screening though
6. Soft, blurry engine
7. Quality
8. Soft/Quality
9. Looks ok...
10. Crop it more
11. Dunno about the nose..


User currently offlineThierryD From Luxembourg, joined Dec 2005, 2070 posts, RR: 51
Reply 3, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 4905 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SUPPORT

1. soft, light heat haze
2. soft
3. slightly soft
4. soft, front part blurry
5. looks ok, a little dark though
6. slightly soft and dark, color cast (greenish)
7. soft
8. soft
9. slightly soft, dark
10. dark, front part soft
11. soft, dark

I'd say N° 1, 5, 6 and 10 are saveable but the others will be quite difficult to get accepted due to their common nature.
All in all your editing looks ok; try to improve your sharpening (avoid sharpening the sky).
But most important try to get your shots as sharp as possible while taking them (increase aperture, if you have a good zoom try to get some more distance to the planes as they pass by); also try to avoid taking such shots while the sun stands so high in the sky as you'll always have lighting issues with the planes being bright on the top but very dark on the bottom.

Good luck,

Thierry



"Go ahead...make my day"
User currently offlineAirplanenut From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 655 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 4894 times:

Thanks for the comments so far!

As for sharpening, I have been selecting the sky, then doing an inverse so as to only sharpen the plane. I then use unsharp mask. Is there a way to get the pictures a little sharper right off the bat other than an increased aperture? These were shot with either 5.6 or 6.3, I believe. Let me know how much higher I should go  Smile

Regarding the sun, it was actually quite low--these were taken around 6:30/7PM, and the sun was setting (a bit to the right of the nose of the plane if traveling in the direction of the plane), so the sun wasn't really very high.

With respect to zoom, these were taken with an 18-55mm lens, and the larger planes (737 and up) are usually taken without full zoom. From this side, I don't know if it's possible to get a good view further away--these were shot maybe 20-50 feet to the side of the center guiding lights. When the light is on the other side of the planes, I can shoot with a 70-300 lens, but the planes are higher, and give less of a side-on view.

I do appreciate the help so far!

Jeremy



Why yes, in fact, I am a rocket scientist...
User currently offlineEadster From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2216 posts, RR: 14
Reply 5, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 4885 times:

Have a look at your accepted one.

To be honest they don't compare - the others listed are very soft and the contrast is a bit out on some. Your accepted one is really good so I'd be using that as a guide for sharpness.


User currently offlineThierryD From Luxembourg, joined Dec 2005, 2070 posts, RR: 51
Reply 6, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 4877 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SUPPORT

Quoting Airplanenut (Reply 4):
Let me know how much higher I should go

I rarely use less than 9 for such shots.

Quoting Airplanenut (Reply 4):
Regarding the sun, it was actually quite low--these were taken around 6:30/7PM, and the sun was setting (a bit to the right of the nose of the plane if traveling in the direction of the plane), so the sun wasn't really very high.

Then you should really try to get some more distance between you and the plane so as to open the angle at which you're shooting and/or try to get them further down the glide so as to not get as much of the bottom onto the picture. Increasing the distance will also help you somewhat with bluriness issues as you don't have to move your camera so quickly as the plane passes by.

Thierry



"Go ahead...make my day"
User currently offlineGOCAPS16 From Japan, joined Jan 2000, 4346 posts, RR: 20
Reply 7, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 4843 times:

Besides the Air France T7 shot, how come all of your other shots are just standard domestic airlines?  Smile

Kevin


User currently offlineAirplanenut From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 655 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 4 days ago) and read 4814 times:

Quoting GOCAPS16 (Reply 7):
Besides the Air France T7 shot, how come all of your other shots are just standard domestic airlines?

I got to the airport last Sunday after the heavies came in. My shots from the other two visits--many of which I haven't processed yet--are more exciting airlines  Smile



Why yes, in fact, I am a rocket scientist...
User currently offlineAirplanenut From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 655 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 4786 times:

Hi,

I've made a few recommended edits... what do you think?

Air Tran 737-700

ATA 737-800

Southwest 737

Another Southwest

Also, with regards to the international heavies... let me know what you think of these!  Smile

Thanks!

Jeremy



Why yes, in fact, I am a rocket scientist...
User currently offlineThierryD From Luxembourg, joined Dec 2005, 2070 posts, RR: 51
Reply 10, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 4781 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SUPPORT

Air Tran  checkmark 
ATA: better but it still looks a little greenish and you've jaggies on the nose below the cockpit windows; eliminate these and lighten up the image a little bit and it should go  checkmark 
Soutwest1: better but the bluriness on the front part kills it (unsaveable I'd say)
Southwest2  checkmark  if you eliminate the small jaggies on the nose gear doors

Thierry



"Go ahead...make my day"
User currently offlineAirplanenut From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 655 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 4753 times:

Thanks for the help! I've uploaded these four:

ATA 737

Air Tran 737--In doing this, I found out its the first shot of the plane in the DB... delivered only two months and a day before I shot it  Smile

Southwest 737

Singapore A340

Let me know what you think  Smile



Why yes, in fact, I am a rocket scientist...
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Your Thoughts On These Two Shots ... posted Wed Jan 14 2004 08:37:45 by AAGold
Your Thoughts On These Pictures? posted Mon Nov 15 2004 17:07:16 by AirKas1
Your Opinion On These Shots - Worth Uploading? posted Thu Sep 7 2006 01:04:05 by Acontador
Your Opinion On These Shots posted Tue Jul 26 2005 06:59:16 by FightingDingo
Please Your Opinion On These Pictures posted Sat Nov 18 2006 14:23:26 by Acontador
Your Thoughts On Watermarks And F/C Membership posted Sat Nov 4 2006 20:09:01 by BigPhilNYC
Your Thoughts On This Motive Rejection? posted Sun Aug 6 2006 08:29:49 by Futterman
Your Thoughts On This Photo - And Viewer Behaviour posted Fri May 26 2006 18:16:46 by Psych
Your Thoughts On A Quality Rejection posted Fri Dec 30 2005 12:21:13 by Psych
Your Thoughts On This Please posted Sat Dec 10 2005 01:36:16 by AirImage