Kukkudrill From Malta, joined Dec 2004, 1122 posts, RR: 5 Reply 11, posted (6 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 2373 times:
Was in the 70s at the start of the year, dropped to the 50s (ironically after I upgraded from an Olympus C-740 to a Canon 350D) but slowly regained ground and now stands at 80%. My main problem has been getting the sharpening right. Hopefully I'm better at it now.
Make the most of the available light ... a lesson of photography that applies to life
JumboJim747 From Australia, joined Oct 2004, 2462 posts, RR: 50 Reply 16, posted (6 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 2344 times:
Quoting IL76 (Reply 14): Dropped from 96% to 88%, all because of one photo. Rejected, appealed + rejected, re-edit rejected, appeal + rejected. 4 rejections (= 8%) all by one photo...
WOOOW and some of us think we have it hard .
Not meaning anything bad towards you Eduard but makes me feel better knowing even screeners go through these sort of stuff.
Mine was also at 88% until a few rejections and an appeal got it down to 84% but I'm not complaining not sure how long it will stay there thou
What Is Being Done About The Slow Queue? (by Navigator Jul 5 2006 in Aviation Photography)
All shots were carefully selected and pre-screened and uploaded on 5 different days and I've got some 20-30 more photos waiting to be edited and uploaded so I need to be pushing a little bit before my next major photoshooting.
Anyway, it's not my fault the screeners work so slowly...