Eadster From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2216 posts, RR: 12
Reply 1, posted (9 years 7 months 4 hours ago) and read 3560 times:
Ok this is just my take on the pics with my Anet hat on.
The two motive ones. My eyes kept wondering over the shot looking for something that was different. Something to catch my eye. There's nothing there. I was expecting a different cloud formation or a storm or just something.
The others, well I don't know. I'm not a fan of shots taken out over a wing. A nice view or something to take my eye away from the wing would have been good. But thats just my 2 cents worth. I think that's what helped in getting the one above accepted.
Quality seems ok but they are large pics. Maybe a smaller version may help. There's something there that screeners are seeing that I'm not and that's why they are in the job.
SNATH From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 3254 posts, RR: 20
Reply 3, posted (9 years 6 months 4 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 3519 times:
Quoting Eadster (Reply 1): Quality seems ok but they are large pics. Maybe a smaller version may help.
Thanks for the reply. Yes, I will definitely resubmit 1 and 2, with less contrast and smaller size. I'd love to know what the quality issue the screeners saw is (softness? noise? etc.).
Quoting Airplanepics (Reply 2): I really like the 3rd one, the reflection's on the wing make it different to other wing photos.
BadMotive? I can't see it.
Thank you. I feel the same about 3 too.
Incidentally, does anyone know whether there is a problem in the e-mail notification system. Over the past 24 hours I got 2 accepted and 4 rejected, but I still haven't got any of the notifications about them yet.
Nikon: we don't want more pixels, we want better pixels.