Does This Have Any Chance? — Aviation Photography Forum

Sponsor Message:


My Starred Topics \| Profile \| New Topic \| Forum Index \| Help \| Search

Does This Have Any Chance?

9VSRH From Australia, joined Apr 2005, 132 posts, RR: 1
Posted (6 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 2079 times:

Hey Everyone
I'm still trying for my first pic on the DB. Does this photo have a chance?

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/middle/ready/IMG_2502_V2.jpg

Cheers
Patrick

8 replies: All unread, jump to last

Granite From UK - Scotland, joined exactly 14 years ago today! , 5542 posts, RR: 67
Reply 1, posted (6 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 2072 times:

AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

Patrick

Not viewing on the best of monitors here at work but looks pretty good to me.

Regards

Gary

FlyingZacko From Germany, joined May 2005, 583 posts, RR: 6
Reply 2, posted (6 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 2040 times:

A bigger photo to look at wouldn't be bad.

Cheers,
Sebastian

Canon 40D + 24-70 f/2.8 L + 70-200 f/4 L + Speedlite 430EX

PUnmuth@VIE From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 4161 posts, RR: 56
Reply 3, posted (6 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 2038 times:

Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting FlyingZacko (Reply 2):
A bigger photo to look at wouldn't be bad.

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/IMG_2502_V2.jpg

Newark777 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 9348 posts, RR: 33
Reply 4, posted (6 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 2002 times:

Both links don't work.

Harry

Why grab a Heine when you can grab a Busch?

9VSRH From Australia, joined Apr 2005, 132 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (6 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 1961 times:

ah just rejected http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...?filename=20060727_IMG_2502_V2.jpg . Could I save it?

EDIT: i forgot to add it was rejected for 'quality'. Thanks Smile

[Edited 2006-07-28 00:32:06]

Psych From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 2968 posts, RR: 60
Reply 6, posted (6 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 1942 times:

Hello Patrick.

This looks like one of those examples where, because the aircraft is not directly perpendicular to your position (i.e. flying towards you rather than directly 'opposite' you), some aspects of the aircraft are sharp whereas others are very slightly soft. If you take a look at the rear half of the fuselage - such as the cabin windows - they do not look totally sharp.

If this is this kind of problem in the original then there may not be much you can do in editing. But if you feel I may be able to help feel free to drop me a line.

All the best and good luck for your first acceptance.

Paul

Aero145 From Iceland, joined Jan 2005, 3070 posts, RR: 23
Reply 7, posted (6 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 1921 times:

Quoting Psych (Reply 6):
This looks like one of those examples where, because the aircraft is not directly perpendicular to your position (i.e. flying towards you rather than directly 'opposite' you), some aspects of the aircraft are sharp whereas others are very slightly soft. If you take a look at the rear half of the fuselage - such as the cabin windows - they do not look totally sharp.

Very well said, Paul!

checkmark

I agree with Paul - but that's a nice shot nevertheless (IMO).

Regards,
Aero145

9VSRH From Australia, joined Apr 2005, 132 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (6 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days ago) and read 1889 times:

Thanks very much guys, It's pretty much the same in the original . I guess I'll have to call this one a loss Sad

Top Of Page

Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics: