Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Canon EOS350D Or Olympus E-500  
User currently offlineGeorgL From Estonia, joined Jun 2005, 26 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 8 months 3 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 3861 times:

Hello!

I've always wanted to become an aviation photographer and I have a few pictures in A.net taken with a cheaper camera. I am actually an aviation videographer and as I'm going to USA next week, I thought that it would be a big mistake going to such a great trip without a good SLR. I've now decided to buy a camera and I will probably get the EOS 350D. However, recently I found the newer Olympus Evolt E-500 which is slightly cheaper than EOS. It has a few features better than EOS, while the Canon has lots of features I prefer over that.

Is there any reason I should get the E-500? I will go and purchase the cam this evening so thanks for the quick replies!  Wink

15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineEDDL From Germany, joined Dec 2002, 738 posts, RR: 16
Reply 1, posted (7 years 8 months 3 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 3858 times:

Don't know the E-500 but you can't go wrong with the 350D. The camera is not the most important thing, the lens line-up is far more important. There you can't beat Canon.

User currently offlineJorge1812 From Germany, joined exactly 10 years ago today! , 3148 posts, RR: 8
Reply 2, posted (7 years 8 months 3 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 3835 times:

I would (and have gone) go for Canon. The E-500 has a crop factor of 2 which means every 18mm lens is a 36mm lens and every 300mm a 600mm. Not bad to have 600mm of course but 18mm (or 27 on the 350D) is often needed for Air shows (static) and Cabin/cockpit/wing view. Plus the things EDDL mentioned.

Georg


User currently offlineKukkudrill From Malta, joined Dec 2004, 1123 posts, RR: 5
Reply 3, posted (7 years 8 months 3 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 3827 times:

The Olympus points the way to the future for DSLRs with its in-camera image stabilisation (instead of in the lens) and sensor dust removal mechanism. But apart from the range of its lenses the Canon has an edge in image quality, particularly at high ISO settings. See www.dpreview.com which has in-depth reviews of both cameras.


Make the most of the available light ... a lesson of photography that applies to life
User currently offlineANITIX87 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 3292 posts, RR: 13
Reply 4, posted (7 years 8 months 3 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 3826 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting GeorgL (Thread starter):
Is there any reason I should get the E-500?

Hi!

I bought the Olympus a month ago and I love it. It has so many amazing features, one of which is the Supersonic Wave Filter to clean the sensor. I've had no dust yet after a month of almost constant use.

If you're looking to go into aviation photography, as I was, get the Olympus just for the reason that for 800 USD you get the camera, a 14-45mm lens, and a 40-150mm lens. As Jorge1812 said, it has a 2x crop factor, but since the low end starts at 14mm your base will be 28mm, only one more than the 350D. And then, your maximum is 300mm. For the 350D you need to buy the kit with the 18-55 and then get (if you don't want to spend a fortune) the Sigma 70-300USM which is somewhere around 200 dollars. You'd end up paying more than the Olympus kit, and you'd have the big gap between 55 and 70mm.

As for adding lenses later on, keep this in mind. Olympus lenses are on par with Canon and Nikon quality, but they are VERY, VERY expensive. An Olympus 50-200 is 850 dollars, where as the same lens made by Sigma for Canon or Nikon camera is around 550.

Just my two cents, I'll leave the decision to you, but you should know that I am very happy with the Olympus.

TIS



www.stellaryear.com: Canon EOS 50D, Canon EOS 5DMkII, Sigma 50mm 1.4, Canon 24-70 2.8L II, Canon 100mm 2.8L, Canon 100-4
User currently offlineGeorgL From Estonia, joined Jun 2005, 26 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (7 years 8 months 3 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 3790 times:

Thanks to all for the great information!! I bought the EOS350D yesterday before reading ANITIX87 great reply, but I think it was a good decision to get the Canon. I like it a lot and cheaper lenses is an important factor for me. I've already taken lots of pictures in the garden and can't wait to photograph some airplanes. It will probably happen from the coming Saturday when I'm flying to a fly-in and then I will go to the other side of the world - an airpark in Arizona.

Hope I get some good pics submitted to A.net! I really appreciate your help.


User currently offlineJorge1812 From Germany, joined exactly 10 years ago today! , 3148 posts, RR: 8
Reply 6, posted (7 years 8 months 3 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 3777 times:

Quoting GeorgL (Reply 5):
but I think it was a good decision to get the Canon

Yes it was, congrats on your new equipment.

Georg


User currently offlineAero145 From Iceland, joined Jan 2005, 3071 posts, RR: 21
Reply 7, posted (7 years 8 months 3 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 3771 times:

Quoting Jorge1812 (Reply 6):
Yes it was, congrats on your new equipment.

 checkmark 

Congratulations, GeorgL!

You'll not go wrong with Canon in the future, as of the high amount of lenses available.

 wave 


User currently offlineGeorgL From Estonia, joined Jun 2005, 26 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (7 years 8 months 3 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 3751 times:

Thanks, guys! If anyone is interested, have a look at what I've catched already: http://georg.lennuk.net/gallery/index.php?cat=10001

User currently offlineAC773 From Canada, joined Nov 2005, 1730 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (7 years 8 months 3 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 3749 times:

Quoting GeorgL (Reply 8):

There are some nice macro shots in there. What lens are you using?



Better to be nouveau than never to have been riche at all.
User currently offlineGeorgL From Estonia, joined Jun 2005, 26 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (7 years 8 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 3732 times:

Thank you. I used the 18-55 lens which came with the kit. No extra lenses bought here yet.

User currently offlineQXRamperMEII From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 93 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (7 years 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 3646 times:

Well I was going to post an identical thread, but this one fits the bill rather well. First off, this is my first posting on Anet. I'm getting very serious about aviation photography, and I'm looking to upgrade my equipment. My Dad is a pro photographer; through his connections I can get a Canon 30D kit (comes with the 19-55mm lens) and the Canon 100-400mm EF IS lens, new, for about $2000. Would this be worth it? I'm not trying to buy talent, but it seems like a great deal, not to pass up.
Most importantly, would this be a good camera/lens combo to do some great shooting with? As I said, I'm still pretty new, but I'm really enjoying it and want to improve.


User currently offlineViv From Ireland, joined May 2005, 3142 posts, RR: 29
Reply 12, posted (7 years 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 3643 times:

Quoting QXRamperMEII (Reply 11):
Canon 30D kit (comes with the 19-55mm lens) and the Canon 100-400mm EF IS lens

An excellent combination (and I speak from the perspective of being a Nikon user)!



Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
User currently offlineJorge1812 From Germany, joined exactly 10 years ago today! , 3148 posts, RR: 8
Reply 13, posted (7 years 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 3631 times:

Quoting QXRamperMEII (Reply 11):
Most importantly, would this be a good camera/lens combo to do some great shooting with?

Not many better ways to start aviation photography - go for it.

Georg


User currently offlineQXRamperMEII From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 93 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (7 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 3595 times:

Awesome....thanks for the input. Ive done a bit of shooting, but I haven't been too successful getting posted, yet. Thanks again, and you'll be seeing my work soon!

User currently offlineA388 From Netherlands Antilles, joined May 2001, 9564 posts, RR: 11
Reply 15, posted (7 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 3567 times:

A bit off topic but what's the exact difference between the EOS350D and the 30D? Some say the photo quality is similar while others say it isn't. If the photo quality is very similar why is the 30D so much more expensive?

I bought the EOS350D Rebel here in Curacao in April (incl. EF-90-300mm USM lense) for USD $1000 which is a good price. Yesterday when I went to the same electronics store, they now have the 30D for about USD $1300 dollar (only the kit). So it is quite a bit more expensive. It has never been that clear what separates the 30D from the EOS350D.

A388


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Canon EOS350D Not Always Working, Need Help! posted Thu Nov 2 2006 15:59:15 by A388
Canon 5D Or Future Canon Cameras. posted Wed Jul 12 2006 02:52:09 by Res
Olympus E-500 posted Fri Dec 16 2005 01:22:54 by ANITIX87
Canon 300D...or What's Better For The Price? posted Tue Dec 28 2004 11:38:25 by Andz
Canon 300D + Sigma 50-500 APO ...experience!? posted Mon Dec 27 2004 14:27:50 by Wernair
Canon 300D Or Nikon D70? posted Fri Nov 5 2004 12:25:31 by LifelinerOne
Should I Go For A Canon D30 Or 300d? posted Mon Sep 13 2004 20:33:17 by A319114
Digital Camera: Canon A75 Or Panasonic Lumix FX1/5 posted Wed Sep 8 2004 15:27:56 by Teahan
Canon G5 Or Sony V1? posted Thu Jul 15 2004 02:45:26 by SNATH
Digital SLR, Canon EOS300D Or Nikon D70? posted Wed Jun 30 2004 00:07:03 by NEXtime