Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
My First Two Contrast Rejections  
User currently offlineNicolasRubio From Argentina, joined Sep 2005, 584 posts, RR: 3
Posted (7 years 11 months 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 3607 times:

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20060822_d-abtb_taxiing.jpg

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20060822_ec-jnz_parked2.jpg

Are these any better?

http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/2400/dabtbtaxiingkc2.jpg

http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/6149/ecjnzparked2lz5.jpg

PS: The LH shot was also rejected by BAD QUALITY!


Gripped 7D + Sigma 10-20mm + 17-40L + 50mm f/1.8 II + 70-200mm f/4L IS + EF 400mm f/5.6L + 580EX II
12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJumboJim747 From Australia, joined Oct 2004, 2464 posts, RR: 45
Reply 1, posted (7 years 11 months 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 3592 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting NicolasRubio (Thread starter):
Are these any better?

Nicolas i dont think the LH 747 is any better as some of the detail is gone now that you have added a bit more contest.
The biz looks better.
Cheers



On a wing and a prayer
User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 52
Reply 2, posted (7 years 11 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 3571 times:

Quoting NicolasRubio (Thread starter):
PS: The LH shot was also rejected by BAD QUALITY!

Valid rejections....both.

Quoting NicolasRubio (Thread starter):
Are these any better?

Not really, but you can always appeal if you feel lucky.


User currently offlineBubbles From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1193 posts, RR: 51
Reply 3, posted (7 years 11 months 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 3559 times:

Quoting NicolasRubio (Thread starter):
Are these any better?

Hi Nicolas

I don't think LH will make it. The newer version doesn't look right in terms of contrast and quality.

And for EC-JNZ, the newer edition looks better than the rejected one. But I clearly see jaggies in that image, which may cause the QUALITY or OVERSHARPENED rejection.

Just my  twocents .

Regards

_Hongyin_


User currently offlineEadster From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2216 posts, RR: 14
Reply 4, posted (7 years 11 months 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 3547 times:

Agree with the above. Second edit on the Biz is ok but jaggered and a bit too sharp in spots.

LH, well don't bother with that one. Not even close to quality for here. A leader for the personal collection.

Martin


User currently offlineNicolasRubio From Argentina, joined Sep 2005, 584 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (7 years 11 months 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 3520 times:

Quoting JeffM (Reply 2):

Valid rejections....both.

I know... I didn't say they were unfair...

Well, since I got my new camera, I've never had more than 2 rejections out of 5 pictures sent... But I returned to old times today... 0% acceptance ratio...

This are the other three...

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20060823_n67157_parked.jpg

That was for grainy and level...

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20060823_pp-jbs_parked.jpg

This was for level after passing first screening...

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20060823_xa-myn_parked.jpg

This was for quality, grainy and dark...

Is there any possibility to save them?

[Edited 2006-08-23 22:15:29]


Gripped 7D + Sigma 10-20mm + 17-40L + 50mm f/1.8 II + 70-200mm f/4L IS + EF 400mm f/5.6L + 580EX II
User currently offlineBubbles From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1193 posts, RR: 51
Reply 6, posted (7 years 11 months 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 3509 times:

Hi Nicolas

For N67157, it may need slight CCW rotation. And the grainy rejection might be from the fuselage looked a bit noisy.

PP-JBS, it may need CW rotation.

XA-MYN, I think the rejection reasons are all related with the unideal lighting condition.

As the second image only has one rejection reason, I think that is the easiest one to fix. For other two, I suggest shooting them again in a sunny day.

Regards

_Hongyin_


User currently offlineEadster From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2216 posts, RR: 14
Reply 7, posted (7 years 11 months 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 3497 times:

The 767 hasn't quality again - too much grain under the wing.

Biz's - first one level it. The cheat lines seem to be jaggered and grainy so watch those. Bit of grain on the second too. Re-work from scratch and see how they go.


User currently offlineLanas From Argentina, joined Aug 2006, 978 posts, RR: 13
Reply 8, posted (7 years 11 months 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 3481 times:

LH: Difficult. I agree with the contrast rejection and it has also quality problems on the grey area of the fuselage.

EC-JNZ: Quality. Try working with layers.

CO 767: Too grainy under the wing and around the registration number. I don´t see too much of a level issue here.

PP-JBS: Level, definitely deserves a CW rotation.

XA-MYN: Better, but still some grain.

If you re-edit from scratch I would start with PP-JBS first.

Cheers!
Lanas.-



"Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens." J.R.R. Tolkien
User currently offlineLasham From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2005, 226 posts, RR: 18
Reply 9, posted (7 years 11 months 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 3469 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Quoting NicolasRubio (Reply 5):
Well, since I got my new camera, I've never had more than 2 rejections out of 5 pictures sent... But I returned to old times today... 0% acceptance ratio...

Hi Nicolas.

Ok the contrast is a bit low but this is more down to the weather than your photography! A sunny shot will always be easier to get on the DB than a darkish shot that needed extra PS to get it looking better.

Seems that a lot of photograrphers are missing the point that to get quality you need good lighting.

I wish you many sunny days.

Bye
Tony



No sun no fun
User currently offlineNicolasRubio From Argentina, joined Sep 2005, 584 posts, RR: 3
Reply 10, posted (7 years 11 months 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 3429 times:

Thanks everyone! I'll start again from scratch!

Quoting Lasham (Reply 9):
Ok the contrast is a bit low but this is more down to the weather than your photography!

I know, but ramp access is not an everyday thing for me... Just every three months as average...

Quoting Lasham (Reply 9):

Seems that a lot of photograrphers are missing the point that to get quality you need good lighting.

I perfectly know that... But as our intl airport is a pain in the a$$ for spotting, and I am the only photographer who can take photographs there (unfortunately), and besides I get ramp access, I love sharing my photos taken at EZE because if not there are almost no photos of that airport... Once every three months maybe there are some additions (mine), and this time I got a not so good weather, but at least I wanted to share the best I could come up with using my crappy point n shoot!

PS: I am not angry at all in case someone is wondering about it, I just wanted to comment on the situation!



Gripped 7D + Sigma 10-20mm + 17-40L + 50mm f/1.8 II + 70-200mm f/4L IS + EF 400mm f/5.6L + 580EX II
User currently offlineLasham From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2005, 226 posts, RR: 18
Reply 11, posted (7 years 11 months 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 3419 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Quoting NicolasRubio (Reply 10):
I know, but ramp access is not an everyday thing for me... Just every three months as average...

Nothing worse than getting the day that turned out cloudy.

Good luck on your next visit.

Tony



No sun no fun
User currently offlineNicolasRubio From Argentina, joined Sep 2005, 584 posts, RR: 3
Reply 12, posted (7 years 11 months 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 3415 times:

Quoting Lasham (Reply 11):
Nothing worse than getting the day that turned out cloudy.

Believe me, it was HORRIBLE! When I was on my way to EZE and started seeing some fog and bad weather I wanted to die! And when I got to the terminal and saw that LV-ALJ (AR's B744) had been diverted! Well... It was very sad, although when it came back I photographed it and got into the cockpit...

Quoting Lasham (Reply 11):
Good luck on your next visit.

Tony

Thanks! I hope that when LH brings the A380 I get good weather! And also I hope they make a demonstration, as I would manage to be on board if there are "passengers"...



Gripped 7D + Sigma 10-20mm + 17-40L + 50mm f/1.8 II + 70-200mm f/4L IS + EF 400mm f/5.6L + 580EX II
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
My First Two Attempts posted Sun Nov 5 2006 00:59:38 by KSUpilot
My First Two Days Spotting At BOS (Pics Inside) posted Sat Jan 14 2006 18:36:17 by TUNisia
My First Photo Usage Request, Help Please! posted Mon Nov 6 2006 01:15:29 by NicolasRubio
My First A.net Picture posted Sat Oct 28 2006 00:56:00 by COIAH756CA
My First Nightshots posted Fri Oct 13 2006 22:33:48 by Schreiner
My First Mag Cover A Thanks To All posted Tue Aug 15 2006 13:50:20 by JumboJim747
My First Day With Canon Digital Rebel XT.. posted Thu Aug 10 2006 06:27:24 by COIAH756CA
Help On Two Colours Rejections posted Sun Aug 6 2006 04:20:11 by AGD
My First Time (Critique).... posted Fri Aug 4 2006 01:57:46 by Extremetrek
I Got My First Picture Accepted! posted Sat Jul 22 2006 09:06:21 by 757MDE