I'm sure about the registration N875RR. Of course, it could be that something is wrong with my eyes
First time I got a reject -for info- with this nice comment
"N875RR_Jan12.jpg looks like N876RR?"
After a appeal and second upload another rejection -for info- with this comment: "appealed and rejected,what are you trying to prove here?"
I really appreciate the screeners work and I have not the intention to prove something. But a little answer could help a lot. Please?
Clickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9444 posts, RR: 72 Reply 3, posted (6 years 9 months 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 1879 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW PHOTO SCREENER
well, your link goes nowhere, so that is no help.
Reuploading a picture after appeal and rejection is frowned upon, hence the message you got. What else was your picture rejected for, besides info?
Chances are if it was rejected twice (one in the normal queue, once on appeal) there IS something wrong with it, simply reuploading is not the answer.
Sulman From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2004, 2028 posts, RR: 35 Reply 8, posted (6 years 9 months 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 1850 times:
I wouldn't do that if I were you - I'm wondering if there is more to the rejection than the registration? You need some input from the screener, don't just upload it again, it'll annoy them.
Clickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9444 posts, RR: 72 Reply 11, posted (6 years 9 months 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 1841 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW PHOTO SCREENER
LOL that reg is hard to read!
Certainley if the photog got the reg wrong it was not malicious or dumb. The thing is hard to read. I am not convinced that it is 876RR, but if someone knows, reupload it with a note to the screening team explaining why you are reuploading it.
Shep From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 13, posted (6 years 9 months 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 1835 times:
It is definitely N875RR.
Look at the number in question - 6 should be curved at the top - but you can see the angle shape of a 5. Also, zoom in on the reg. You can see it is a 5 - no question about it...
I know - My question was meant as how often do their update their register on the web. There might be a timelag .....
But anyway, looks like Shep hit the nail on the head ....
BrianW999 From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 310 posts, RR: 6 Reply 16, posted (6 years 9 months 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 1821 times:
I can see why the photographer is a trifle annoyed. I can also see the screeners annoyance at having a picture reuploaded after a second rejection......but......
...If screeners are going to reject based on incorrect info should they not be checking the relevant database to make sure they are correct ? Lets face it, an N number reg check took me 20 seconds to perform and showed me that N876RR does not exist but N875RR is indeed allocated according to the picture.
777MechSys From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 350 posts, RR: 2 Reply 17, posted (6 years 9 months 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 1809 times:
Quoting Rotate (Reply 15): I know - My question was meant as how often do their update their register on the web.
Well, considering you can use their website to request/hold tail numbers it should be rather current. BTW I just requested N876RR and it is currently available. Give me a credit card number and it can be yours.
Sponsor Message: 
From , joined Dec 1969, posts, 
From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 3262 posts, 
From Austria, joined Apr 2004, 3765 posts, 
From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2004, 2028 posts, 
From Switzerland, joined Feb 2003, 1479 posts, 
From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1193 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
