I'm sure about the registration N875RR. Of course, it could be that something is wrong with my eyes
First time I got a reject -for info- with this nice comment
"N875RR_Jan12.jpg looks like N876RR?"
After a appeal and second upload another rejection -for info- with this comment: "appealed and rejected,what are you trying to prove here?"
I really appreciate the screeners work and I have not the intention to prove something. But a little answer could help a lot. Please?
Clickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9706 posts, RR: 67
Reply 11, posted (8 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 3566 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW PHOTO SCREENER
LOL that reg is hard to read!
Certainley if the photog got the reg wrong it was not malicious or dumb. The thing is hard to read. I am not convinced that it is 876RR, but if someone knows, reupload it with a note to the screening team explaining why you are reuploading it.
BrianW999 From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 314 posts, RR: 5
Reply 16, posted (8 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 3546 times:
I can see why the photographer is a trifle annoyed. I can also see the screeners annoyance at having a picture reuploaded after a second rejection......but......
...If screeners are going to reject based on incorrect info should they not be checking the relevant database to make sure they are correct ? Lets face it, an N number reg check took me 20 seconds to perform and showed me that N876RR does not exist but N875RR is indeed allocated according to the picture.
777MechSys From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 350 posts, RR: 3
Reply 17, posted (8 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 3534 times:
Quoting Rotate (Reply 15): I know - My question was meant as how often do their update their register on the web.
Well, considering you can use their website to request/hold tail numbers it should be rather current. BTW I just requested N876RR and it is currently available. Give me a credit card number and it can be yours.