Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
C&C For Two Dusk Shots In The Queue Please  
User currently offlineIAH777 From United States of America, joined Mar 2008, 0 posts, RR: 5
Posted (7 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 4899 times:

I've not had much luck of getting dusk shots accepted and would appreciate some comment and constructive critique from the group.

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/a_ja8193_1.jpg

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/a_lx-gcv_1.jpg

I fear the Cargolux shot may be too soft (?), but have high hopes for the JAL Cargo.

Thank you.

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineLanas From Argentina, joined Aug 2006, 978 posts, RR: 13
Reply 1, posted (7 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 4892 times:

I don´t know. There´s something wrong but I can´t figure it out right. I see them oversharpened but also there might have been some problem with the compression. You´ll see what I mean on the JAL Cargo titles, on the slats and on the rear part of the engines of the right wing. The Cargolux suffers the same problem, but with a bit of grain on some parts.
My two cents.

Cheers!
Lanas.-



"Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens." J.R.R. Tolkien
User currently offline777MechSys From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 350 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (7 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 4863 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I would have to agree... JAL has some bad JPEG compression (wing trailing edge, tail). Cargolux is pretty grainy overall.

User currently offlineIAH777 From United States of America, joined Mar 2008, 0 posts, RR: 5
Reply 3, posted (7 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 4861 times:

Now that its been pointed out, its glaringly obvious to me. Thanks for the input.

User currently offlineSulman From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 2035 posts, RR: 33
Reply 4, posted (7 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 4828 times:

I think the JAL shot is salvageable - it's not compression you're seeing, rather a sharpening artefact ('halo') caused by USM increasing the relative contrast around the edge - quite easily fixable - use JeffM's mask technique or various selection tools, whatever you find easier.

James



It takes a big man to admit they are wrong, and I am not a big man.
User currently offlineIAH777 From United States of America, joined Mar 2008, 0 posts, RR: 5
Reply 5, posted (7 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 4822 times:

Alas, I'm still carving my images caveman-style with PSE 2.0.  Sad However, I've recently been made aware of Adobe's promo allowing PSE owners to trade-up to CS2 for $299. Planning to make that swap in the next couple of days.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Changing Info On Shots In The Queue posted Tue Apr 5 2005 13:50:23 by Vzlet
Shots In The Rain, Pics Inside,need Help! Please! posted Wed Dec 7 2005 16:29:27 by Cadet57
Two Vintage Boeings In The Top Four! posted Fri Aug 25 2006 21:42:22 by F4wso
Changing Comments In The Queue posted Fri Jun 2 2006 17:52:44 by Sleekjet
Appeal Not Showing In The Queue? posted Wed Feb 22 2006 04:10:54 by Fiveholer
Should I Leave This One In The Queue, Or Pull It? posted Mon Dec 19 2005 14:09:11 by Viv
Is There A Way To Edit A Photo In The Queue? posted Tue Nov 8 2005 07:11:37 by Airplanenut
Woah! What's Going On In The Queue? posted Tue May 10 2005 18:59:28 by UA777222
Corrections To Photos In The Queue posted Sat Jul 17 2004 17:50:23 by Skymonster
It's Uploaded But Not In The Queue posted Tue Feb 17 2004 22:01:51 by Karlok