Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Rejection For Soft - New Version Ok?  
User currently offlineConinpa From Luxembourg, joined May 2005, 244 posts, RR: 6
Posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 3186 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

Hi all,

This one has been rejected for "Soft"
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...s/big/20060829_Red-Bull-trio-4.jpg

I reworked it. Can I have your opinion ?
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/Red-Bull-trio-5.jpg

Thanks all
Patrick


Patrick De Coninck
6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineThierryD From Luxembourg, joined Dec 2005, 2068 posts, RR: 51
Reply 1, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 3181 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SUPPORT

Well, I'm again on my uncalibrated laptop monitor here but to me the improved version looks ok (light jaggies on the trailing edge of the port elevator of the bottom plane you might wanna remove).
Really great shot that surely deserves a place in the database!
Good luck!

Thierry



"Go ahead...make my day"
User currently offlineLHRsunriser From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2004, 399 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 3181 times:

Yes I agree the second shot looks alot better. The first was just soft and there is limited grain added by the extra sharpening. Good Luck!

Cheers Dom



Getting back into it
User currently offlineEadster From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2216 posts, RR: 14
Reply 3, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 3168 times:

Sharpened one is much better - it's a very nice shot. Should do quite ok.

User currently offlineConinpa From Luxembourg, joined May 2005, 244 posts, RR: 6
Reply 4, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 3163 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

Quoting ThierryD (Reply 1):
(light jaggies on the trailing edge of the port elevator of the bottom plane you might wanna remove)

 thumbsup  What an eye ! Did not see this...

Thanks to all for your comments.
Patrick



Patrick De Coninck
User currently offlineConinpa From Luxembourg, joined May 2005, 244 posts, RR: 6
Reply 5, posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 3084 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

Thanks again all, it has been accepted after reworking.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Patrick De Coninck


Cheers.
Patrick



Patrick De Coninck
User currently offlineGertLOWG From Austria, joined May 2005, 85 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 3020 times:

Hello!

I got this photo rejected because it is too soft:

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...s/big/20060826_ANGERTGGGGGRZ87.jpg

Here is the new version:

Big version: Width: 1024 Height: 682 File size: 377kb


Is it any better now? Thanks alot for your help

Best Regards!


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Rejection For Bad Info And Quality posted Sun Sep 3 2006 19:50:06 by Coninpa
Rejected For Soft... Really? posted Thu Jul 20 2006 14:51:17 by Ptrjong
Rejection For 'Info'. posted Mon Jul 3 2006 17:51:52 by Viv
Rejection - "Soft" posted Sun Jun 4 2006 21:51:51 by LukasMako
What Memory For My New 350D! posted Sat Apr 29 2006 15:02:37 by Muddydwagon
Rejection Assistance - Soft posted Mon Apr 24 2006 13:15:40 by UA935
Rejection For Bad Quality posted Sun Apr 23 2006 12:48:02 by A388
Just Had A Few Rejections For Soft Help Needed. posted Sun Apr 16 2006 08:43:05 by JumboJim747
Rejection For "Motive" posted Thu Apr 13 2006 09:13:24 by Coninpa
Rejection For Bad Centered, Need Help posted Tue Mar 7 2006 04:55:33 by A388