Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Paper Or Slides?  
User currently offline747 4-ever From Sweden, joined Feb 2001, 604 posts, RR: 18
Posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 1604 times:

I'm using Kodak Gold ASA200,paper, but I'm considering to try taking some slides, I've asked in the photo store for Kodachrome and it costs 15 $, is it worth the price?

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 19
Reply 1, posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 1555 times:

Get Fuji Sensia 100. Lot cheaper and very good.


I wish I were flying
User currently offlineGhost77 From Mexico, joined Mar 2000, 5224 posts, RR: 51
Reply 2, posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 1528 times:

You won´t get dissapointed if you take slides.. I used to take paper but now I´m convinced that slides are better!!


Ricardo Morales - flyAPM - ¡No es que maneje rapido, solo estoy volando lento!
User currently offline747 4-ever From Sweden, joined Feb 2001, 604 posts, RR: 18
Reply 3, posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 1512 times:

OK! Thank you guys!  Big thumbs up

User currently offlinePsa188 From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 527 posts, RR: 18
Reply 4, posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1497 times:

Check B&H in New York. They sell Kodachrome for about $10 a roll, including processing. K64 is still the best slide film, IMHO.

User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 19
Reply 5, posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1494 times:

he's not in the US which means two things:
1) hefty import charges when buying from the US (voiding even the 50% lower price at B&H) and
2) US mailers are useless as Kodak will not ship the processed slides back to you (continuous lower 48 states only for that).



I wish I were flying
User currently offlineCrewChief32 From Germany, joined Dec 2000, 418 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 1490 times:

I use print film since I did begin with that hobby many years ago and I want to say that I am very satisfied with the results.
I use brand names like Kodak or Agfa, but also "no-names" like Perutz (they`re damn cheap), but I think it finally depends on the lab that does the development.
And I can think of atleast two resons why I prefer print films, one is the possibility of getting several prints from one negative in the same quality (for an album or for trading, for example) and the second is that you can go through an album, for example, and look at all the prints
quite easily.

Just my 0.02Euros worth opinion
CC32


User currently offlineFlygga From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 1483 times:

The debate over prints vs. slides is all a matter of personal prefrence and what you want to do with your photos after you shoot them. It is easier to get good quality scans from slides than from prints. Personally however I prefer prints. The main problem with prints however, is the processing. Most 1 hour photo labs have terrible quality. I only use a professional film lab for my processing. You can really tell the difference in the results.

I prefer prints for the same reason CrewChief32 does. I like looking at my photo collection a lot. With slides you either have to look at them through a loupe or use a projector. In using a projector, the hot bright light, is not good for the slides if you do it too much.

Richard Silagi


User currently offlineYKA From Netherlands, joined Sep 2001, 766 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 1470 times:

Slide film is the best choice for where proffessional results are required, such as getting photos accepted to airliners.net. Slides are also much easier to store and last much longer meaning that and your photo will never be subjected to the colour/brightness corrections that occur when prints are printed. Finaly, prints can also be made from slides, if you want your shot to hang on the wall.

On a final note, slide film should really only be used with SLR cameras though, since the exposure needs to spot on and p&s cameras with their comperatively slow lenes often rquire the flash to light the nearby objects while leaving the subject, such as an aircraft some distance away, underexposed. This is one aplication where print film should be used since lab workers can crank up the brightness to produce the final, more correctly exposed print.

p.s. I use fuji sensia(ex sensia II).


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Slides Or HI-Res CD posted Thu Feb 9 2006 03:19:39 by Cadet57
Keep Or Discard "Junk" Slides? posted Fri May 23 2003 21:16:13 by Brick
LHR Meetup This Weekend? Slides Or Film? posted Wed Apr 2 2003 17:42:09 by Mirrodie
VH-XBA: B&W Or In Colour? posted Sat Dec 9 2006 18:07:42 by Airplanepics
Sony Alpha, Nikon D80, Or The Canon 30D? posted Sun Dec 3 2006 07:52:33 by Kaitak744
Lucky Or Planned? posted Fri Dec 1 2006 14:17:39 by Andrej
Soft Or Sharp? posted Thu Nov 30 2006 06:45:10 by D L X
Adobe PSE 5 Vs Corel PSP X Or XI posted Thu Nov 30 2006 05:40:13 by Avsfan
Re-Work Or Forget It posted Mon Nov 27 2006 14:10:52 by Mrk25
Canon EOS 1d Mark II Or The Mark II N posted Sat Nov 25 2006 11:56:47 by Singel09