Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
What SLR Lenses Should I Invest In?  
User currently offlineBlazingCessna From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 113 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 3919 times:

I am just lost looking at all these damn lenses! Someone please help!!! I need a lens for general indoor, general outdoor, and of course spotting. Running a Rebel XT right now, but saving for a 1Ds Mk II. On that note, am I going into overkill with that 1Ds?


Flown on:722, 731, 732, 742, 752, 763, DC8, DC9, DC10, A300, A319, A320, A330, PIC on C172, PA28R, D55, A36, DC3
13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineWoody001 From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 529 posts, RR: 22
Reply 1, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 3917 times:

As has been said a lot of times before;
Go for the most expensive lens you can afford too at the moment. You will still be shooting through an 'L' series lens long after your XT or 1Ds have died.

I personally wouldn't save for the 1Ds, I'd go for optics all the time. I know several photographers who are still shooting with D60's and 10D's. Only if you need the very best fps performance or quality should you make use of the features from the 1Ds.

Cheers,
Ian.



If I could just get the afterburner working...
User currently offlineIL76 From Netherlands, joined Jan 2004, 2237 posts, RR: 49
Reply 2, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 3901 times:

If you are seriously saving up for a 1Ds II, buy the best/most expensive lenses you can find. Otherwise the 1Ds II is like a Ferrari on wooden carriage wheels. The 1Ds II will show all deficiencies of most lenses, so you'd better screw on a good one then.
A iDs II is overkill for most purposes though, in my opinion..

E

[Edited 2006-09-06 14:15:39]

User currently offlineSmAlbany From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 285 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 3886 times:

Quoting BlazingCessna (Thread starter):
Someone please help!!!

Well, there are certainly a lot of options - I don't know that there is any one perfect setup.

I have a 300D and have gone with a fairly popular lens lineup based on bang for the buck.

50 1.8 - for indoor portraits with no flash
17-40 - for close aircraft and general indoor use (in combo with an external flash)
70-200 f/4 - mostly for spotting but also really good for other outdoor shots
1.4TC - in case 200 isn't quite enough reach

I think that gives you the ability to get good shots in a wide variety of conditions.

I'm sure that there are other set ups that would work as well, but this is what I went with. My weakness is the 17-40 F/4 for indoors. I would really like a fast lens but can't justify the cost.

Good luck!

Dan

by the way, these lenses will all work on a full frame camera - if you should ever decide to go that route

[Edited 2006-09-06 14:40:21]

[Edited 2006-09-06 14:54:05]

User currently offlineWietse From Netherlands, joined Oct 2001, 3809 posts, RR: 55
Reply 4, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 3881 times:

Going with the general consensus here that quality should be paramount:

For indoor general use: Canon EF 24-70 2.8L
Outdoor general use: Same, but depending on camera (Crop Factor) you might want to pick up a Canon EF 17-40 4L
Aviation Photography: Depending on your airport, either a 70-200 2.8 IS or a 100-400 L IS



Wietse de Graaf
User currently offlineAero145 From Iceland, joined Jan 2005, 3071 posts, RR: 21
Reply 5, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 3811 times:

Blazing Cessna.

I'd invest in a cheaper camera, Canon EOS-1D Mark II N, and then invest in these lenses:

Canon 16-35mm f/2.8L USM
Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L USM
Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L (IS) USM
Canon Extender 1.4x II

Then one has 16-200mm f/2.8L USM, and Extender which makes the 70-200 98-280mm f/4L USM.

So I'd think it like this: Canon 16-280mm f/2.8-4L USM... nice...? Big grin

Of course, it's very expensive, but 1Ds is not a common camera for aviation, though, Suresh A. Atapattu has got two of them, even Mark IIs. And when you have full-frame bodies, you have to have extremely good glass, as everything that's wrong with the lenses can be seen on the full frame bodies, but the crop bodies "crop" out the corners of the lenses, so they can't be seen on the photos. the 1D Mark II N has a 1.3 crop sensor.


Just my  twocents  .

Regards,
Aero145


User currently offlineBlazingCessna From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 113 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 3722 times:

So I could just keep on shooting with the XT, and get the better lenses and have my cake and eat it too!!

Thanks very much for the information, I really do appreciate it. I hope to have a few pic on the database by years end!



Flown on:722, 731, 732, 742, 752, 763, DC8, DC9, DC10, A300, A319, A320, A330, PIC on C172, PA28R, D55, A36, DC3
User currently offlineAero145 From Iceland, joined Jan 2005, 3071 posts, RR: 21
Reply 7, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 3687 times:

Of course you can keep your XT, so you can buy very expensive lenses, as IMO they'll probably be very good on your 1.6 crop sensor.

Good luck with the purchasing!  Wink


User currently offlineLHRSIMON From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2002, 1343 posts, RR: 23
Reply 8, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 3674 times:

17-40 L F4.0 (For general)
70-200 L IS USM F2.8 (for aviation)
1.4 x II extender.

With that little lot you pretty much have coverage from 17-280 mm with only a couple of gaps. (17-40 / 70-280 )

[Edited 2006-09-07 17:16:52]


Canon 1D Mk III,Canon 20D+17-40 L f4.0,70-200 L IS USM f2.8,400 L USM f5.6,135 mm L f2.0, 50 mm f1.8,1.4 x II extender
User currently offlineDiezel From Netherlands, joined Oct 2002, 646 posts, RR: 11
Reply 9, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 3670 times:

I agree with the "buy lenses" reactions. But if aviation, sport or action is what you shoot all the time, it is not bad to consider a camera which can shoot at least 6 RAW images in a row at the highest speed (within a few seconds). This will increase your chance of getting a real good image when shooting action.

Roel.



Never be afraid of what you like. (Miles Davis)
User currently offlineDehowie From Australia, joined Feb 2004, 1057 posts, RR: 33
Reply 10, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 1 day ago) and read 3616 times:

As a good lens suite here we go.

16-35/2.8
24-70/2.8
70-200IS
100-400L or a 300F4 depending on how much quality you are after.
If you are serious about action style shots ditch the 1Ds for a 1DMk2N and put the extra cash towards glass.
Darren



2EOS1DX,EF14.2.8LII,17TS,85/1.2,16-35L,24-70LII,24L,70-200F2.8LII,100-400,300/400/500/800L
User currently offlineAero145 From Iceland, joined Jan 2005, 3071 posts, RR: 21
Reply 11, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 3581 times:

Quoting Dehowie (Reply 10):

16-35/2.8
24-70/2.8
70-200IS
100-400L or a 300F4 depending on how much quality you are after.
If you are serious about action style shots ditch the 1Ds for a 1DMk2N and put the extra cash towards glass.

Nice you're thinking the same as me!  Silly Big grin

Quoting Aero145 (Reply 5):
I'd invest in a cheaper camera, Canon EOS-1D Mark II N, and then invest in these lenses:

Canon 16-35mm f/2.8L USM
Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L USM
Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L (IS) USM


User currently offlineSpencer From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2004, 1635 posts, RR: 17
Reply 12, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 3543 times:

I've just ordered the EF24-105/f4 L IS USM. I'll let you know how I get on in a few weeks!
Spencer.



EOS1D4, 7D, 30D, 100-400/4.5-5.6 L IS USM, 70-200/2.8 L IS2 USM, 17-40 f4 L USM, 24-105 f4 L IS USM, 85 f1.8 USM
User currently offlineJRowson From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 351 posts, RR: 12
Reply 13, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 3455 times:

The new 24-105 F4 L IS is awesome. I've not used my 17-40 since i got it.

My current most used line up is:

Canon 20d
10-22
24-105 f4L
70-200 f2.8LIS
1.4x converter

Also in the kit bag but increasingly unused: 100-400, 17-40 f4, 50mm f1.8 and a Siggy 24-70 which i need to sell.



James Rowson. Canonite and lover of all things L. JAR Photography.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
What Lenses Should I Have In My Arsenal? posted Thu Jan 8 2004 03:07:16 by Jasonwinn
What Should Be In The Title Field For This Plane? posted Tue Sep 7 2004 14:02:06 by Eksath
What Is The Meaning Of F/4-5.6 In A Lens? posted Tue Feb 7 2006 14:21:08 by TACAA320
So What Category Does This Belong In Then? posted Sat Jun 4 2005 02:07:26 by Pilot kaz
Advice/Help: What Digital Camera Should I Buy? posted Mon Apr 18 2005 21:02:08 by SignalOne
Eurofly 747? What Airline C/s Is This One In? posted Fri Apr 9 2004 21:13:54 by MIAMIx707
What's The Most-Viewed Photo In The Database? posted Tue Sep 9 2003 23:29:34 by N670UW
What Happened To My Photo In The Queue? posted Sat Nov 2 2002 21:10:36 by USAFHummer
D60: Which Lenses Should I Buy? posted Tue Aug 13 2002 12:32:15 by Apuneger
What Canon Lense Should I Buy? posted Tue Apr 9 2002 00:40:15 by Kd