DLKAPA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted
Fri Sep 8 2006 02:02:15 UTC (8 years 8 months 11 hours ago) and read 1738 times:
I'm on a laptop at the moment, but this still doesn't look overexposed to me.
San747 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 4994 posts, RR: 12
Reply 2, posted
Fri Sep 8 2006 03:53:17 UTC (8 years 8 months 9 hours ago) and read 1716 times:
I'm not really sure, I'm no expert... Maybe lower the brightness?
Scotty doesn't know...
Bubbles From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1197 posts, RR: 50
Reply 3, posted
Fri Sep 8 2006 04:30:13 UTC (8 years 8 months 8 hours ago) and read 1701 times:
I think even if in the most of cases we could do nothing about the overexposed photos, this one seems salvageable on this point. But I feel this photo looks blurry (please look at the cabin windows on the left side of this image) which is hardly fixed.
JeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3267 posts, RR: 51
Reply 4, posted
Fri Sep 8 2006 04:39:44 UTC (8 years 8 months 8 hours ago) and read 1698 times:
The entire upper third of the fuselage is overexposed. Unless there is something special about this photo, I wouldn't waste any time on it.
Chrisair From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 2236 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted
Fri Sep 8 2006 09:47:30 UTC (8 years 8 months 3 hours ago) and read 1654 times:
If you have photoshop CS2, use the Shadow/Highlight filter. Pull the highlights up, you can probably get some of the data back.
If you open your info box, you can tell if the highlights are lost by rolling the cursor over the area, if it shows 255/255/255 for the Red, Green and Blue channels, the data is gone.