Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
A "level" Rejection  
User currently offlineCosec59 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 2765 times:

I've just had this rejected for level.
I used the brick building on the right as my vertical guide. Any advice greatly appreciated.

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r.../big/20060914_B16103FAB2307PJB.jpg

10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTimdeGroot From Netherlands, joined Apr 2002, 3674 posts, RR: 64
Reply 1, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 2758 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Would say it needs some cw, the verticals towards the left are leaning. It's a little hot as well.

Tim



Alderman Exit
User currently offlineAero145 From Iceland, joined Jan 2005, 3071 posts, RR: 21
Reply 2, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 2758 times:

I agree with Tim.

I myself almost never level using verticals on the right or left, only in the middle (if possible). Many lenses have got distortions, usually the cheap ones...


User currently offline9VSPO From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 2758 times:

Needs rotating clockwise slightly. However, I would say the main problem is the white fuselage which is 'blown' and lacks any detail, not the levelling.

User currently offlineCosec59 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 2745 times:

Quoting TimdeGroot (Reply 1):
It's a little hot as well.



Quoting 9VSPO (Reply 3):
I would say the main problem is the white fuselage which is 'blown' and lacks any detail, not the levelling.

"Level" was the only reason given.

Quoting Aero145 (Reply 2):
Many lenses have got distortions, usually the cheap ones...

I don't call the 100-400 cheap  Wink


User currently offlineAero145 From Iceland, joined Jan 2005, 3071 posts, RR: 21
Reply 5, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 2711 times:

Quoting Cosec59 (Reply 4):
I don't call the 100-400 cheap

No, but if you use a 5D, AFAIK, it will produce pretty much distortions, among vignetting...


User currently offlineCosec59 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 2708 times:

Quoting Aero145 (Reply 5):
No, but if you use a 5D,

I use a 20D


User currently offlineEadster From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2216 posts, RR: 14
Reply 7, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2698 times:

I'd go a little easier on the sharpening on this shot. Rework from original, with note of the level and the jaggies apprearing in many parts of the shot.

Little less processing and should be ok.


User currently offlinePsych From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 3048 posts, RR: 58
Reply 8, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2677 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Phil.

I agree with comments above. The screeners may look at those wheels as well - with the right set (as we look) quite a lot higher than the left. I think they need to be more level, unless that throws the background completely off. That fuselage is overexposed and I would be a bit shocked if that was not a problem in a reupload. Also the current edit has notable jaggies along the edge of the horizontal stabiliser. Could there even be a bit if evidence of heat haze?

Apologies for 'dissing' the shot (as my daughter would say) - I think it would need to look different to get through.

All the best.

Paul


User currently offlineCosec59 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2671 times:

Thanks all. I did try to level as Paul suggested with the wheels, but the buildings went way out.
I will have another go at it bearing in mind all the good advice given


User currently offlineAero145 From Iceland, joined Jan 2005, 3071 posts, RR: 21
Reply 10, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2659 times:

Quoting Cosec59 (Reply 6):
I use a 20D

Very good! Then there should be very little distortions... Big grin


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
A "level" Rejection posted Thu Sep 14 2006 20:24:38 by Cosec59
Another "motiv" Rejection... posted Mon Sep 11 2006 00:56:26 by Walter2222
"People" Rejection.... Where Are The People? posted Tue Jul 25 2006 00:36:02 by PipoA380
Rejection - "Soft" posted Sun Jun 4 2006 21:51:51 by LukasMako
"editing" The Dreaded Rejection... posted Fri Apr 14 2006 22:26:57 by Eksath
Rejection For "Motive" posted Thu Apr 13 2006 09:13:24 by Coninpa
What Is The Meaning Of "motive" Rejection? posted Wed Apr 5 2006 09:35:44 by Walter2222
My "best" Rejection So Far! posted Sun Mar 12 2006 14:53:45 by SNATH
Help With "picture Not Level" Rejection posted Sun Mar 12 2006 04:20:40 by SNATH
"Quality" Rejection...please Help posted Fri Feb 3 2006 21:42:26 by Flyfisher1976