ThierryD From Luxembourg, joined Dec 2005, 2069 posts, RR: 51
Reply 1, posted (8 years 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 3550 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW HEAD SUPPORT
My area of expertise!
AMS + bad weather (bad lighting) + common plane + common motive = quality rejection
The quality of your 2 shots is ok but due to the mentionned reasons they won't make it to A.net as there are just already too many similar shots with even better quality in the db.
When you shoot in AMS with weather like this you'll have to get a very special motive or plane to get it accepted on A.net these times.
Alphafloor From Chile, joined Jun 2004, 1277 posts, RR: 40
Reply 3, posted (8 years 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 3525 times:
Thanks for your input guys.
Quoting ThierryD (Reply 1): The quality of your 2 shots is ok but due to the mentionned reasons they won't make it to A.net as there are just already too many similar shots with even better quality in the db.
Shouldn't be mentioned on the rejection email 'Common' ?
Ptrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 3944 posts, RR: 18
Reply 4, posted (8 years 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 3505 times:
9V-SVN has a still managable 54 shots in the database and EC-JPL has actually only nine shots in the database. I'm not complaining, but sometimes there seems to be an inbuilt penalty for shooting in AMS - I got some shots of similarly common aircraft accepted from other locations that I believe would never have made it had they been shot at AMS. I can kind of understand that as AMS is obviously over-represented with some 3% of all photos in the database, but this is not being said officially.
Quoting Alphafloor (Reply 3): Shouldn't be mentioned on the rejection email 'Common' ?
The COMMON rejection only kicks in with 80 or so shots in the database. I think it's a little misleading because rarity/commonness is always being taken into account, no matter whether the plane has 0, 10, 30 or 200 shots in the db.
The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)