Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Post Your Negative Scans With Film / Scanner Info  
User currently offlinePRM From Burkina Faso, joined Apr 2002, 351 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 4242 times:

Hi all,

I'm in the process of deciding what to buy in the way of a film scanner to scan my (mainly 1990's consumer quality Kodak Gold and Fuji HG 100-200ASA print film) and encourage all of you with older shots to post examples to help me decide! I've seen some great examples of what can be done with relatively inexpensive flatbed scanners (Gary), but would have the budget to stretch to a more-expensive dedicated film scanner if the results justify the means.....

I've contacted a few individuals for specific details on certain shots (thanks again to you all), and now would especially like to see examples posted shot with regular 100 or 200ASA print film specifying:

- the exact film type and speed if possible;
- details of scanner used and dpi settings;
- editing software used (Photoshop Elements / CS2 / Vuescan / Siverfast etc);
- any other specific editing done (e.g. Neatimage)

With this we can compare the different outputs. Obviously considerations will be made to light, weather conditions and age of the print.

Please post as many as you can, as hopefully the exercise will be informative for others planning to make similar decisions.

Cheers,Paul

13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinePRM From Burkina Faso, joined Apr 2002, 351 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 4233 times:

I understand editing methods will vary and have considerable effect on the end result, nevertheless I'll start with some examples (using a Minolta Scan Elite II before it broke down, @ 2820dpi max scanning resolution, 8-bit colour, Minolta scanning software, saved as TIFF , edited in Photoshop Elements 2)


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Paul Morley
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Paul Morley


Kodak Gold 200


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Paul Morley
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Paul Morley


Fuij HG 200


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Paul Morley


Jessops 200 (woohoo!)


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Paul Morley


Fuij Reala 100

Next!


User currently offlineRG828 From Brazil, joined Jan 2004, 582 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 4190 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Hi Paul,
As of late I've been using an Epson perfection 4490 Photo flatbed scanner:
print reflective scans:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Carlos A. Morillo Doria
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Carlos A. Morillo Doria



negative scans:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Carlos A. Morillo Doria
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Carlos A. Morillo Doria



Ever since I used an Epson 3170 I have become an ardent Epson fan. Their flatbeds have impressive negative scanning capabilities (the 4490 has 6400 dpi uninterpolated capability, 12800 interpolated) and really do the job well, considering their price. Admittedly I struggle with slide scans - somehow they are much more difficult to process since they come out dark after scanning.

Most of my shots were done with Kodak Gold 100, with some exceptions:

Fuji 800 press:
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Carlos A. Morillo Doria



Fuji 3200(!):
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Carlos A. Morillo Doria



Kodak PJB multi-ASA film:
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Carlos A. Morillo Doria
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Carlos A. Morillo Doria



I've used most color negatives out there: Kodak, Konica, Agfa, Fuji, and almost every ISO possible, but Kodak Gold 100 processes the easiest. Plus, it stood the test of time much better than the others.

What I normally do is import the image using PS CS on a high - but manageable dpi setting, like something between 4000-6400. I scan the 'raw' image, with no adjustments whatsoever (ICE, autocolor, etc.) Workable image is around 8000 pixels wide, 60mb Tiff.

The raw scan usually has some severe color cast on it, so after levelling and cropping I use the levels adjustments options/adjust white or grey points to get the real colors back. Usually after that some auto color will do the final color corrections. I never use Auto color only, usually levels.

After curves and saturations adjustments I use the "despeckle" function to remove some of the graininess. Multiple times, if necessary.

I then separate the areas I want sharpened using the quick mask feature, save the selection, sharpen using Unsharp Mask (500, 0.2), then resize to 1024, bring out the mask selection and sharpen again using a higher setting - usually 175, 0.3-0.4.

I never got used to Neatimage as I find it similar to PS's Smart Blur function.

And thats it! A fellow photog pointed out a new flatbed from Epson, the V750 Pro, with fluid-mount capability - surely something to keep an eye on!

Cheers



I dont know the key to success, but the key to failure is trying to please everyone
User currently offlineIrish251 From Ireland, joined Nov 2004, 969 posts, RR: 4
Reply 3, posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 4184 times:

This is quite a useful past thread if you haven't seen it:

Masterclass: Slide Scanning And Further Processing (by Beechcraft May 21 2006 in Aviation Photography)


User currently offlineGhostbase From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 354 posts, RR: 3
Reply 4, posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 4181 times:

A few recently scanned and uploaded examples:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Michael Baldock
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Michael Baldock



Both taken 1987 on Kodak CA 100 print film, very pleased with how these have come out.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Michael Baldock
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Michael Baldock



Both taken 1996 on Fuji 100 print film, I think it was Superia, was not happy with these at all. Horrible colour cast.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Michael Baldock
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Michael Baldock



Both taken 1989 and I think these were on Sainsburys supermarket 'own label' cheap film, believed to be manufactured by Fuji. Was 100 ASA. Excellent results considering what the film cost.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Michael Baldock
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Michael Baldock



Both taken 1990 on Kodak Gold 100-2 which seems to excel in these poor light situations.

Scanned on an Acer Scanwit 2720S film scanner at 2700 dpi, worked as TIFF files until final save as JPEG, Neat Image grain reduction software, Photoshop LE (equivalent to Elements), dust spot cloning using Micrographx Picture Publisher.

Over 1000 old film shots 1987 to 2000 on A.Net - works for me  

  

Note: I don't think the Acer film scanners exist now, they might have been rebadged though.

2nd Note: Have recently learned to always have a play with the colour using the levels tool, it is amazing how a photo suddenly looks much better after a few experimental dabs!

[Edited 2006-09-15 20:20:16]


"I chase my dreams but I never seem to arrive"
User currently offlineLasham From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2005, 226 posts, RR: 17
Reply 5, posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 4181 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Quoting PRM (Thread starter):
the exact film type and speed if possible;
- details of scanner used and dpi settings;
- editing software used (Photoshop Elements / CS2 / Vuescan / Siverfast etc);
- any other specific editing done (e.g. Neatimage)

Epson 1600SU flatbed with Neg & Pos top. 300 dpi.

Then Photoshop CS. Seems you can give them loads of USM without any problems.

Never use neat Img as just dont like it. Grain ok for old shots.

Good luck and look forward to seeing some

Put a comment to the screeners that its a scan as if they look too good they might think its a digi shot!!

Tony



No sun no fun
User currently offlineLasham From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2005, 226 posts, RR: 17
Reply 6, posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 4178 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Quoting Ghostbase (Reply 4):
Both taken 1996 on Fuji 100 print film, I think it was Superia, was not happy with these at all. Horrible colour cast.

Hi

Easy to loose that colour in PS. Give it Magenta in and some cyan out.
Might be worth uploading the new colour.

Tony



No sun no fun
User currently offlineRG828 From Brazil, joined Jan 2004, 582 posts, RR: 2
Reply 7, posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 4163 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Quoting Lasham (Reply 5):
Put a comment to the screeners that its a scan as if they look too good they might think its a digi shot!!

I wish that were true, honestly I think it matters little.  frown 

Quoting Ghostbase (Reply 4):
Fuji 100 print film, I think it was Superia, was not happy with these at all. Horrible colour cast.

I've had great experiences with Superia, I'll try to dig out some examples.
Fuji Reala was fantastic, similar to Gold 100.
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Carlos A. Morillo Doria


Easy to process with PS as well.



I dont know the key to success, but the key to failure is trying to please everyone
User currently offlineIL76 From Netherlands, joined Jan 2004, 2237 posts, RR: 48
Reply 8, posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 4151 times:

Paul,

You had emailed me already, but I'll write down some more detail here.
I had/have 3 ways of scanning pictures.

1: Flatbed scan of prints. My oldest uploads were scanned with a very low resolution scanner and were 'touched up' using Paint Shop, all at my university. Looking at them now makes me cringe:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Eduard Brantjes



I recently started to rescan/reupload my first uploads with a Canoscan FB630Ui and editing in Photoshop.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Eduard Brantjes



2: Negative/slidescanner. I have a Primefilm 1800i scanner, which is pretty bad, but I managed to get some shot accepted here up until about 4 years ago. Used for slides and negatives. Edited with Photoshop 5.5.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Eduard Brantjes



3: A Canon 10D + 17-40mm lens.   I 'scanned' a few of my prints by taking a picture of them. This was before I got the Canoscan to work. Quite tricky because of the reflections, but the quality is quite good! Edited in Photoshop, the same way as I edit my digital shots.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Eduard Brantjes


Cheers,
Eduard

PS, I forgot: All my film/slide shots were taken on either Kodak Gold 100/200, Fuji Superia 100/200 or Fuji Sensia 100 (slides).

[Edited 2006-09-15 21:46:24]

User currently offlinePRM From Burkina Faso, joined Apr 2002, 351 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 4119 times:

Hi,

Thanks to Carlos, Tony, Michael, Eduard for the excellent feedback (hope others will come and post their examples too).

Quoting IL76 (Reply 8):
You had emailed me already, but I'll write down some more detail here.

Yep, thanks Eduard. I've been dithering for days over what route to follow on the scanner front, so this more detailed feedback is helping greatly.

Sepcial thanks to Carlos - this feedback is great as your examples equate well to the set-up and materials I'll be working with - both yourself and Gary Watt are getting excellent results with the Epson 4490.

Quoting Irish251 (Reply 3):
This is quite a useful past thread if you haven't seen it:

Masterclass: Slide Scanning And Further Processing (by Beechcraft May 21 2006 in Aviation Photography)

Thanks Irish - I'd looked it up already  Smile

Cheers, Paul


User currently offlineDlednicer From United States of America, joined May 2005, 544 posts, RR: 7
Reply 10, posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 4092 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
DATABASE EDITOR

My Photoshop skills have improved over time, so these are completely representative. I highly recommend using Helicon Filter to reduce noise.

As a side note, I used 400 ASA film to allow me to shoot indoors and outdoors without having to change film. Having the ability to change ISO on my digitial camera sure is nice.

Kodak Ektachrome 400, Nikon Coolscan III:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © David Lednicer
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © David Lednicer



Fuji Provia 400, Nikon Coolscan III:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © David Lednicer
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © David Lednicer



Fuji Provia 400, Nikon Coolscan III, Helicon Filter:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © David Lednicer
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © David Lednicer



User currently offlineTimdegroot From Netherlands, joined Apr 2002, 3674 posts, RR: 64
Reply 11, posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 4091 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Scanned on a Nikon Coolscan IV, from some generic brand of film I think. No noise reduction or similar things used.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Tim de Groot - AirTeamImages




View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Tim de Groot - AirTeamImages




View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Tim de Groot - AirTeamImages



Tim



Alderman Exit
User currently offlineRG828 From Brazil, joined Jan 2004, 582 posts, RR: 2
Reply 12, posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 4083 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Quoting PRM (Reply 9):
Sepcial thanks to Carlos - this feedback is great as your examples equate well to the set-up and materials I'll be working with - both yourself and Gary Watt are getting excellent results with the Epson 4490.

No problem Paul, glad to help! The Epson flatbeds are indeed very impressive. My first scanner was a Minolta Scan dual II and I never really got used to it - slow, somewhat complicated interface, and the graininess really popped out. The 3170 was so much friendlier, and gave fantastic results, considering it was a flatbed and their associated negative film scanning reputation (back then at least.)

Interesting to note than there are now fewer dedicated film scanners in the market nowadays. On B&H only Microtek, Nikon and Pacific Image have them, a third of whats available in the flatbed section.

Cheers



I dont know the key to success, but the key to failure is trying to please everyone
User currently offlinePRM From Burkina Faso, joined Apr 2002, 351 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 4025 times:

Quoting RG828 (Reply 12):
My first scanner was a Minolta Scan dual II and I never really got used to it - slow, somewhat complicated interface, and the graininess really popped out.

And this was exactly my experience with the Minolta Scan Elite II (esp. the graininess, even when running the Digital ICE and GEM which invoked horrible scan times...

Thanks to Tim and David for further posts, and to all earlier posters plus those I contacted personally - I think I'll be heading down the Epson Flatbed route.

Cheers,
Paul


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Problems With Negative Scans. posted Wed Jun 5 2002 01:42:30 by Lewis
AN225 At MAN - Post Your Pictures! posted Mon Oct 2 2006 17:47:12 by Azza40
Post Your Latest Photo Part 2 posted Fri Apr 7 2006 17:36:36 by NIKV69
Post Your Helicopter Images Here For Critique posted Sat Feb 11 2006 04:35:58 by Air2Air
Shooting With Film (preference) posted Fri Jan 20 2006 19:16:43 by Dcz00
Uploads With New Scanner. posted Fri Jan 13 2006 05:19:01 by Jspitfire
Epson Perfection 3590 Film Scanner - Any Users? posted Thu Sep 15 2005 05:59:40 by Cathay111
Your Help Please With RAW posted Mon Mar 28 2005 18:09:30 by Psych
Post Your Fav. Shot(s) That Did Not Make It Here posted Sun Aug 22 2004 03:49:08 by Eksath
Nikon D70 Users! Post Your Work! posted Thu Apr 8 2004 00:08:41 by Ghost77