Kukkudrill From Malta, joined Dec 2004, 1123 posts, RR: 4
Reply 1, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 4139 times:
Audacious attempt and all credit to you for trying it but it does look a touch blurry I have to say (as well as jagged in places). Problem is, to deal with the distance rejection you'd have to crop to enlarge the aircraft in the frame and that would only accentuate the blur. I'm no Photoshop guru but I doubt if it can be saved.
Make the most of the available light ... a lesson of photography that applies to life
JumboJim747 From Australia, joined Oct 2004, 2465 posts, RR: 41
Reply 3, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 4119 times:
J I'm at work so i cant comment on quality here.
But your panning shots are always top notch one of my all time favourites is the emirates at Sydney.
But for distance it does need to be cropped closer.
ThierryD From Luxembourg, joined Dec 2005, 2106 posts, RR: 50
Reply 4, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 4107 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW HEAD SUPPORT
I doubt the salvageability of this one Javier due to the above mentionned reasons. You'd definitely have to crop in closer and that would make it even harder, if not impossible, to correct the blurry and quality issues (for A.net standards).
Gutsy attempt though with 600mm and 1/10s exposure and pretty good result for that combination anyway! Just do some more workout and next time you'll be able to keep the camera perfectly steady.
INNflight From Switzerland, joined Apr 2004, 3782 posts, RR: 58
Reply 8, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 4088 times:
Comparing a daylight ISO 100 shot to an early morning one at ISO 400 and a 300mm to a 600mm with 1/100th compared to 1/10th isn't the same league, don't you think?
Sorry if this sounds harsh, but you seem to have the need of contributing just about anything.
How valuable is this to tell somebody else the settings for a pan? Another airport, longer distances ( 600mm for an A340 not even full frame, the distance for a light aircraft? Go figure. ), less light, different intentions.
Aero145 From Iceland, joined Jan 2005, 3071 posts, RR: 17
Reply 10, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 4080 times:
Quoting INNflight (Reply 8): but you seem to have the need of contributing just about anything.
Can't you stop? You said me to show a pan, that one is the best I've got. What do you think I am? Javier Guerrero 2? I'm me, and I haven't got the experience as Javier has got, but when I give opinions, you are bashing like I don't know what...
Yeh, because you've got a much better panning shot than I, that means that you may say everything bad about me as you want?
TimdeGroot From Netherlands, joined Apr 2002, 3674 posts, RR: 63
Reply 12, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 4066 times:
1/100th is panning now?
I do think Aero145 is entitled to give his opinion on the issues with the shot, no need to shoot him down because he comes off like a goof in his own posts, he is right here.. But the advice about trying it ona different aircraft at 1/60th is hardly helpful.
J, you heard my opinions on the shot. It probably was rejected as a bordercase.
Javibi From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 24, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 3941 times:
Thanks for the help offers to you all, just what I wanted, some e-mails have been sent
Quoting JumboJim747 (Reply 3): But your panning shots are always top notch one of my all time favourites is the emirates at Sydney.
Quoting ThierryD (Reply 4): Just do some more workout and next time you'll be able to keep the camera perfectly steady
Just for the record, this is not handheld, no way I could do that with the EF 600 f4!
Quoting IL76 (Reply 16): 600mm? Did you buy a new lens there?!
Nope, I just borrowed a friend's! I plan to get myself an EF 500 f4 in the near future, though
@David: you had it coming, because (first of all) it seems you did not even read my post. I did not complain about the rejection in any way, I did not even ask for opinions on the shot, I know very well why it was rejected; I just asked for help editing it for A.net. Anyway you jumped in here to criticise my shot (I did have a laugh with your first post). Well, Tim is right when he says
Quoting TimdeGroot (Reply 12): I do think Aero145 is entitled to give his opinion on the issues with the shot
but I think you usually come a bit too "aggressive" in many of your posts before you have earned the respect of the forum (if you wish to be like that, cool, but do not complain if people come at you because of it; learn from JeffM ) It could be a cultural thing though, I know for a fact that Icelanders do not have exactly the same character as Spaniards...