Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Any Luck?  
User currently offlineAero145 From Iceland, joined Jan 2005, 3071 posts, RR: 19
Posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 1522 times:

Hey guys.

I was just practising some panning... Well, in my opinion panning...

Here is the result...

http://img127.imageshack.us/img127/2171/tffto988319092006qh0.jpg

Any comments? What should be fixed etc.

Regards and thanks,
Aero145

16 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineLinco22 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 1380 posts, RR: 15
Reply 1, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 1502 times:

David,

Nice try, its pretty sharp overall but two things jump out to me. The top of the wing is overexposed and it looks like you need some CCW rotation

Regards
Colin  Smile


User currently offlineAero145 From Iceland, joined Jan 2005, 3071 posts, RR: 19
Reply 2, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 1486 times:

Quoting Linco22 (Reply 1):
The top of the wing is overexposed and it looks like you need some CCW rotation

I rotated using the verticals in the background...

Any hints how to fix the wing?


User currently offlineLanas From Argentina, joined Aug 2006, 978 posts, RR: 13
Reply 3, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1476 times:

David
Pretty sharp one, congratulations!
For the overexposed area try using the magic wand with Photoshop and then removing some brightness. That might help, for starters.
I see the pic´s level, specially by looking at the houses in the background.
Good job, keep them coming.  Smile

Cheers!
Lanas.-



"Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens." J.R.R. Tolkien
User currently offlineTimdegroot From Netherlands, joined Apr 2002, 3674 posts, RR: 64
Reply 4, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1465 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Try this on an A340-600 at 600mm at 1/10th Wink

Seriously though, good quality shot, perhaps just oversharpened by a tiny ammount.

Tim



Alderman Exit
User currently offlineAero145 From Iceland, joined Jan 2005, 3071 posts, RR: 19
Reply 5, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1458 times:

Quoting Timdegroot (Reply 4):
Try this on an A340-600 at 600mm at 1/10th

Tim, could you please stop this?

Quoting Timdegroot (Reply 4):
Seriously though, good quality shot, perhaps just oversharpened by a tiny ammount.

By a tiny amount you say? Thank you very much!

[Edited 2006-09-19 20:30:11]

User currently offlineAero145 From Iceland, joined Jan 2005, 3071 posts, RR: 19
Reply 6, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1456 times:

Quoting Lanas (Reply 3):
Pretty sharp one, congratulations!
For the overexposed area try using the magic wand with Photoshop and then removing some brightness. That might help, for starters.
I see the pic´s level, specially by looking at the houses in the background.
Good job, keep them coming.

Thanks for the input. I'll try this magic wand tool on the overexposed areas. I however have never tried to use the wand for anything else than taking the sky off sharpening area.


User currently offlineUA935 From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 610 posts, RR: 6
Reply 7, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1410 times:

Quoting Timdegroot (Reply 4):
Try this on an A340-600 at 600mm at 1/10th

 rotfl  LMAO



Live every second like you mean it
User currently offlineEadster From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2216 posts, RR: 14
Reply 8, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1396 times:

Quoting Timdegroot (Reply 4):
Try this on an A340-600 at 600mm at 1/10th

With or without IS?

Great going on the shot. Its salvagable with a different edit. When re-editing, watch the jaggies around the window on the door.

Good work!


User currently offlineJumboJim747 From Australia, joined Oct 2004, 2465 posts, RR: 44
Reply 9, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1389 times:

I agree with Tim i see it also as slightly over sharpened but a dang fine effort well done David.
Not sure i would use the magic wand as suggested to fix the upper wing might dwell into the realms of manipulation if you do that.
Try just using the shadow highlight tool just a slight amount not too much see what you can come up with.
Cheers



On a wing and a prayer
User currently offlineDiezel From Netherlands, joined Oct 2002, 646 posts, RR: 11
Reply 10, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1378 times:

Very nice shot. Well done. I wouldn't bother too much about the overexposed top of the wing. At least it doesn't bother me at all Big grin

It might also need a little CCW rotation but it's hard to find a reliable vertical to use in this picture.

Maybe a tip: When taking pictures of white bodies in the sun, it is (imho) better to underexpose a little (0.7 stops or so). It will give you more room to correct in PS. When taking pictures against a white background (like a bright sky or snow) I like to overexpose to avoid the all grey look.

Roel.



Never be afraid of what you like. (Miles Davis)
User currently offlineSfilipowicz From Netherlands, joined Jul 2002, 327 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 1357 times:

Congratulations on the difficult panning shot!

Maybe it's only me, but I find the aircraft a little bit low in the frame. If it would be a bit higher in the frame this photo would deserve an A+

Other then that, I still think it will get into the DB.

Steven.


User currently offlineAero145 From Iceland, joined Jan 2005, 3071 posts, RR: 19
Reply 12, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 1346 times:

Quoting UA935 (Reply 7):
LMAO

Don't laugh so much! Javier Guerrero has a shot taken on 600mm f/4 IS 1/10th in the Q.

Quoting Eadster (Reply 8):
With or without IS?

With Image Stabilizer.

Quoting Eadster (Reply 8):
Great going on the shot. Its salvagable with a different edit. When re-editing, watch the jaggies around the window on the door.

Jaggies around the window, gotcha!

Quoting JumboJim747 (Reply 9):
I agree with Tim i see it also as slightly over sharpened but a dang fine effort well done David.

Thank you.

Quoting JumboJim747 (Reply 9):
Not sure i would use the magic wand as suggested to fix the upper wing might dwell into the realms of manipulation if you do that.

I hope it won't fall into manipulation, I'll edit tomorrow.

Quoting JumboJim747 (Reply 9):
Try just using the shadow highlight tool just a slight amount not too much see what you can come up with.

I'll do that.

Quoting Diezel (Reply 10):
Very nice shot. Well done.

Thanks!  embarrased 

Quoting Diezel (Reply 10):
It might also need a little CCW rotation but it's hard to find a reliable vertical to use in this picture.

I agree. But I didn't find good verticals, maybe other screeners could help?

Quoting Diezel (Reply 10):
Maybe a tip: When taking pictures of white bodies in the sun, it is (imho) better to underexpose a little (0.7 stops or so). It will give you more room to correct in PS. When taking pictures against a white background (like a bright sky or snow) I like to overexpose to avoid the all grey look.

Good instructions. Thanks!

Quoting Sfilipowicz (Reply 11):
Congratulations on the difficult panning shot!

Thank you. But, the effort taking the shot was amazingly little: I heard an aircraft from my room, walked outside, and shot. Then I went inside and edited...  Smile

Quoting Sfilipowicz (Reply 11):
Maybe it's only me, but I find the aircraft a little bit low in the frame. If it would be a bit higher in the frame this photo would deserve an A+

A+, wow!  Smile I'll keep bad_centre in mind when editing again.

Quoting Sfilipowicz (Reply 11):
Other then that, I still think it will get into the DB.

Well, I doubt it myself, as this edit is just a quick one. I'll put some effort tomorrow.

Thanks very much everybody for your nice help!

Best regards,
David Alfred Big grin


User currently offlineLanas From Argentina, joined Aug 2006, 978 posts, RR: 13
Reply 13, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1328 times:

Quoting Sfilipowicz (Reply 11):
I find the aircraft a little bit low in the frame

I agree, I didn´t notice that before.

Cheers!
Lanas.-



"Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens." J.R.R. Tolkien
User currently offlineJhribar From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 1295 times:

I'd put the aircraft a little higher in the frame.
Furthermore I agree with Tim regarding the sharpening.
Anyway...even now it is already a nice shot!

rgds,

Jeroen


User currently offlineAero145 From Iceland, joined Jan 2005, 3071 posts, RR: 19
Reply 15, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 21 hours ago) and read 1261 times:

Quoting Jhribar (Reply 14):
I'd put the aircraft a little higher in the frame.
Furthermore I agree with Tim regarding the sharpening.
Anyway...even now it is already a nice shot!

Gotcha, mate.
Thank you!

 Smile


User currently offlineAero145 From Iceland, joined Jan 2005, 3071 posts, RR: 19
Reply 16, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 21 hours ago) and read 1241 times:

Alright. I've edited the photo again, with instructions from people in this thread.

Big version: Width: 1000 Height: 667 File size: 466kb


This is how I edited the photo:

I started with opening Adobe Photoshop CS2 Raw Converter. There I fixed the exposure a little and contrast. Next, I opened the Raw file in Photoshop, and leveled, cropped, and resized to 1050x765 pixels. After that, I used Magic Wand to deselect areas I didn't want to be sharpened. Then I sharpened the areas I wanted to sharpen, with Smart Sharpen. Curves was next on the list, and contrast. There next, I cropped the photo using Canvas size, to 1000x667 pixels. In the end, I put the bits from 16 to 8, and converted the profile to sRGB. The last thing I did, was to save as TF-FTO-9883-19092006-newedit.JPG.

IMO, the previous edit is better...

Maybe some other people would want to try to edit the photo themselfs?

Best regards,
David  sun 


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Feedback Please! Will I Have Any Luck With These? posted Fri May 12 2006 04:15:20 by SNATH
Do You Think I Will Have Any Luck With This Pic? posted Wed Apr 19 2006 21:04:01 by Deaphen
Any Luck With An E20N? posted Tue Jul 27 2004 18:46:34 by Lpmartineau
Any News On The Nikon 70-300 VR... posted Sun Dec 3 2006 18:32:06 by D L X
Monopods Allowed In Carry-on? Any Experience? posted Tue Nov 28 2006 04:22:18 by CalgaryBill
Any Ideas On This? posted Mon Nov 27 2006 08:28:07 by OD720
First Time Any Chance? posted Fri Nov 10 2006 15:36:02 by Pilotallen
Any Ideas How I Can Fix This One? posted Mon Nov 6 2006 16:32:34 by N62NA
Motive Rejection - Any Comments From Screeners? posted Wed Nov 1 2006 15:10:40 by Acontador
Any Of These A.net Worthy? posted Sun Oct 22 2006 11:18:26 by KBFIspotter