Soft Rejections — Aviation Photography Forum

Sponsor Message:


My Starred Topics \| Profile \| New Topic \| Forum Index \| Help \| Search

Soft Rejections

KaiGywer From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 12027 posts, RR: 43
Posted (6 years 8 months 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 1131 times:

Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I just had two more pictures rejected for soft. Does anybody here think they are salvageable?

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...ctions/big/20060919_LNFAMready.jpg
First upload of this one.

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...ions/big/20060919_OY-VKA-ready.jpg
This one was previously rejected only for borders. Recropped it, and now rejected for soft.

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20060905_LNWFU.jpg
First try on this one as well. Also rejected for soft.

If anybody wants to see the originals, let me know.

Thanks,
Kai

911, where is your emergency?

5 replies: All unread, jump to last

Pavvyben From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2006, 178 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (6 years 8 months 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 1120 times:

Seems worrying really, the second one isn't soft at all. Maybe appeal it.

The first one could be salvagable with some selective sharpening.

The third i wouldn't think so, the quality isn't brilliant either and looks blurry

Cheers

Ben

Azza40 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2006, 1052 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (6 years 8 months 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 1113 times:

I am no expert but...

The biggest concern would be the fair amount of grain on the under side of the fuselage on all images.

Aaron swirl

Not been on here for a good 2/3 years!

Eadster From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2214 posts, RR: 16
Reply 3, posted (6 years 8 months 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 1102 times:

To me it looks to be a case of too much use of the shadow/highlights function. This will cause noticable grain. Quality is going to be an issue here, and I don't think these will be salvagable sorry to say.

KaiGywer From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 12027 posts, RR: 43
Reply 4, posted (6 years 8 months 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 1063 times:

Quoting Pavvyben (Reply 1):
The first one could be salvagable with some selective sharpening.

I only know how to sharpen the whole picture.

Quoting Pavvyben (Reply 1):
Seems worrying really, the second one isn't soft at all. Maybe appeal it.

I guess I could try.

Quoting Eadster (Reply 3):
To me it looks to be a case of too much use of the shadow/highlights function

Definately not, since I have no idea what that is Big grin

911, where is your emergency?

LHRsunriser From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2004, 399 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (6 years 8 months 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 1056 times:

Hmm onthe first the windows look soft plus on the other two I feel centering and grain are a problem. I wouldn't appeal tbh

Cheers Dom

Getting back into it

Top Of Page

Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics: