Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Would This Be Rejected For Motive?  
User currently offlineSan747 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 4943 posts, RR: 12
Posted (7 years 12 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 4253 times:

Pretty straightforward question, I got a pic of this FedEx 727 taxiing on the south side of LAX as it passed by Imperial Hill, and I'm wondering if all the buildings and whatnot in the foreground would constitute a "motive" rejection even though they aren't blocking the aircraft...



Thanks for your help!


Scotty doesn't know...
5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBubbles From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1195 posts, RR: 51
Reply 1, posted (7 years 12 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 4249 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Hi San747,

I think so. Motiv rejection includes the following item.

Photos with distracting or obstructing objects in the foreground (this is especially true for gate shots which are very difficult to get accepted due to their common nature and the large amount of equipment which usually surrounds the aircraft). Any equipment or objects blocking parts of the aircraft will result in a motive rejection.

I think the buidings look quite distracting even they're not obstructing the plane.

_Hongyin_


User currently offline9V From China, joined Aug 2008, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (7 years 12 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 4249 times:

My first thoughts are that there is a lot of heat haze, colour imbalance and the photo is not level. Motive is the last thing I would worry about.  Sad

User currently offlineNewark777 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 9348 posts, RR: 29
Reply 3, posted (7 years 12 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 4238 times:

Yes, way too much clutter.

Harry



Why grab a Heine when you can grab a Busch?
User currently offlineAcontador From Chile, joined Jul 2005, 1421 posts, RR: 30
Reply 4, posted (7 years 12 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 4238 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Hi San747,

Quoting 9V (Reply 2):
My first thoughts are that there is a lot of heat haze, colour imbalance and the photo is not level. Motive is the last thing I would worry about.

Sorry, but I have to agree with Ian on this one, and additionally the foreground is really distracting  boggled , so to me this is a high-rejection-risk one.



Just sit back, relax and have a glass of Merlot...enjoy your life!
User currently offlineSan747 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 4943 posts, RR: 12
Reply 5, posted (7 years 12 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 4229 times:

OK, just wondering, I'll keep it for the personal collection... Thanks everyone for the help!


Scotty doesn't know...
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Will This Be Rejected For Bad Motive? posted Sun Nov 14 2004 13:43:12 by Dahlgardo
Would This Be An Acceptable Motive? posted Thu May 25 2006 16:28:47 by Walter2222
Would This Be "bad Motive"? posted Fri May 19 2006 19:15:32 by AIRBUSRIDER
Would This Be Rejected For Bad Personal.? posted Fri Mar 25 2005 06:08:12 by JumboJim747
Would There Be Interest For A Shot Like This posted Mon Aug 21 2006 07:03:22 by JumboJim747
Should This Really Be Rejected For Baddark? posted Sat Dec 18 2004 21:35:08 by KC7MMI
Would This Be Acceptable? posted Sun Oct 15 2006 23:24:42 by Walter2222
Would This Be Double? posted Thu Aug 24 2006 00:45:34 by JumboJim747
Would This Be Considered A "bad" Double? posted Tue May 23 2006 05:22:02 by Je89_w
Would This Be Bad Double posted Wed Apr 26 2006 11:28:15 by CallMeCapt