San747 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 4935 posts, RR: 13 Reply 10, posted (6 years 8 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 2187 times:
You know, I could've sworn I had read in Popular Mechanics about a 4 Gigapixel camera... It could pick up details that the naked eye couldn't even see...
Newark777 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 9348 posts, RR: 33 Reply 11, posted (6 years 8 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 2185 times:
Quoting Ryan h (Reply 7): Sensor like that would attract some serious dust.
Dust? You'd probably small animals stuck on that thing.
Jetmatt777 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 2663 posts, RR: 36 Reply 13, posted (6 years 8 months 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 2155 times:
Wow the proce tag on the 160 MP is:
28,900.00 EUR
Euro = 36,941.56 USD
United States Dollars
CalgaryBill From Canada, joined May 2006, 686 posts, RR: 6 Reply 14, posted (6 years 8 months 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 2153 times:
Quoting San747 (Reply 10): You know, I could've sworn I had read in Popular Mechanics about a 4 Gigapixel camera... It could pick up details that the naked eye couldn't even see...
The gigapixel project is using 9" x 18" roll film, then scanning it. It is not a digital camera. From their website:
"We concluded that, consistent with the largest practicable roll film format (9"×18"), we could expect to achieve a resolution equivalent to 1000 megapixels. Hence, came the name Gigapxl™. With recent developments, this figure approaches 4000 megapixels, but the name remains unchanged."
Jetmatt777 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 2663 posts, RR: 36 Reply 17, posted (6 years 8 months 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 2112 times:
Quoting BrianW999 (Reply 16): ....and think how much a 500 image Compact Flash card would cost !!!