Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Nose To "hot"?  
User currently offlinePavvyben From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2006, 178 posts, RR: 3
Posted (7 years 12 months 13 hours ago) and read 3698 times:

Hi,

http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/8388/bcc1121jc0.jpg

Is the nose within limits for a.net?

Another thing is the centering, is it ok? Finding it a bit tricky to centre, not sure why.

Anything else you notice thats wrong please let me know  Smile.

Thanks

Ben

9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAirkas1 From Netherlands, joined Dec 2003, 3992 posts, RR: 55
Reply 1, posted (7 years 12 months 12 hours ago) and read 3687 times:

Nose looks good, as does the centering.


(I'm on a TFT at the moment though)

[Edited 2006-09-25 13:14:19]

User currently offlinePavvyben From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2006, 178 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (7 years 12 months 12 hours ago) and read 3677 times:

Ok thanks, yea im on a TFT aswell  .

http://img171.imageshack.us/img171/7785/bcc1003ow5.jpg

Im persevering with this photo above as i really love the livery. Ive managed to brighten it up a bit and sharpen it. Is it good to go for upload?

Thanks

Ben

[Edited 2006-09-25 13:21:33]

User currently offlineLanas From Argentina, joined Aug 2006, 978 posts, RR: 13
Reply 3, posted (7 years 12 months 9 hours ago) and read 3613 times:

Ben

First pic: I think the nose is fine, the brightness is a result of the direct sunlight that the rest of the aircraft doesn´t get. What I see here is that you´ve got some soft parts, for instance the nose landing gear. I see it a bit blurry.
Second pic: Very nice livery, I agree. I find it blurry on the landing gear and slightly oversharpened on some edges within the livery or the window frames.
Hope it helps. Big grin

Cheers!
Lanas.-



"Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens." J.R.R. Tolkien
User currently offlineGlobalpics From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 216 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (7 years 12 months 8 hours ago) and read 3597 times:

With the photos, when adjusting your Levels try moving the middle point a little to the left to lighten up the midtones,don't go too far though as this will emphasise any grain or noise that is visible.If you want drop me the origianals and I'll see what I can do.I'm no magician but I might be able to help  Smile

User currently offlineAzza40 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2006, 1052 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (7 years 12 months 8 hours ago) and read 3586 times:

Quoting Pavvyben (Reply 2):

What is the registration of that beautiful looking plane?

Aaron  swirl 



Not been on here for a good 2/3 years!
User currently offlineWoody001 From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 529 posts, RR: 22
Reply 6, posted (7 years 12 months 7 hours ago) and read 3581 times:

It is VP-CMS

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Joel Vogt



Ian.



If I could just get the afterburner working...
User currently offlineAzza40 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2006, 1052 posts, RR: 2
Reply 7, posted (7 years 12 months 3 hours ago) and read 3517 times:

Quoting Woody001 (Reply 6):
It is VP-CMS

My new favourite plane on earth! Cheers!

Aaron  swirl 



Not been on here for a good 2/3 years!
User currently offlineDC10Tim From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2005, 1406 posts, RR: 14
Reply 8, posted (7 years 12 months 3 hours ago) and read 3515 times:

Looks like a nice shot to me.

Tim.



Obviously missing something....
User currently offlinePsych From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 3048 posts, RR: 58
Reply 9, posted (7 years 12 months 1 hour ago) and read 3480 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hello Ben.

I think there may be a few issues with that first shot. The nose does look a little blown out, but that might be in part a consequence of editing. I would have to see the original - but potentially can be improved. More of a concern would be that it does not look sharp in all areas - slight blur in fact. Take a look at the wing root area - here the lines of the livery are a bit soft, as is the wing leading edge, that light and the wheel. My guess is that you might struggle to improve this in an edit. It will look better at a smaller size though. My personal preference would be to sit the aircraft slightly lower in the frame - but this is a very subjective thing. Get in touch if you feel I can help.

As regards the second, again the nose is slightly blown out, and selective sharpening may help the overall feel. This photo looks more promising.

All the best.

Paul


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Clarification "Nose Close Ups" posted Wed Dec 28 2005 10:11:22 by AKE0404AR
Is There A Point To "Rate This Photo"? posted Mon Oct 3 2005 16:32:34 by AndrewUber
Creative Ways To "google". Catching Violations posted Tue Jul 26 2005 15:28:58 by Tappan
Anyone Been To "Glorious Goodwood?" posted Mon Jul 25 2005 22:41:42 by PaveLowDriver
My Contribution To "what Airline Is This?!" posted Sat Apr 30 2005 14:15:40 by INNflight
What Happened To "Tamsin"? posted Sat Jul 24 2004 19:32:07 by Jkw777
Rejected For Being "to Close" ;-) posted Fri Aug 11 2006 21:16:13 by Maiznblu_757
Explain "personal" To Me... posted Sat Jul 15 2006 20:25:50 by Sleekjet
Another "how Much To Ask" Topic... posted Fri Oct 7 2005 13:16:33 by ASalo
Digital "Superzoom" Cameras - Which To Buy? posted Tue Jun 14 2005 04:37:08 by Fanofjets