Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Motiv Rejection Help  
User currently offlineRaptors From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 180 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3492 times:

Hi,

I recently had a reject message for 'motiv' on a similar shot to this. There was no mention from the screener, but several who replied advised me that due to a catering truck which partially featured, could have been the cause.
This is a different shot, and although there is a bit of ground equipment in frame, it to has been rejected for the same reason, motiv.
As I have not received any personal message from the screener, I again would like to ask the opinons here. Is is worth me re-working this, or is this type of shot not permitted anymore?
Any help would be most appreciated.

Regards - Stuart

Big version: Width: 1024 Height: 683 File size: 283kb
This be the one!!!!



SSC/111/146/AR8/AT7/AN3/AB4/6/310/319/20/21/332/3/343/6/703/722/732-9/74L/2/4/F/752/3/772/3/W/E170/190/CR7/9
7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineUnattendedBag From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 2325 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (7 years 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3489 times:

any chance you have the same shot without the ground equipment in the photo? you might try that one.


Slower traffic, keep right
User currently offlineRaptors From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 180 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (7 years 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3483 times:

Unfortunatley not. I guess I could try a tighter crop?

Stuart



SSC/111/146/AR8/AT7/AN3/AB4/6/310/319/20/21/332/3/343/6/703/722/732-9/74L/2/4/F/752/3/772/3/W/E170/190/CR7/9
User currently offlineDendrobatid From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 1667 posts, RR: 62
Reply 3, posted (7 years 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3481 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

Stuart
I rejected this one and the motive was the loading stuff around the hold. Thought I left you a personal too but have checked and didn't.
A tighter crop might be effective to just include the fin and fuselage top of the US Air though I suspect you might run into size/format problems.
I like this type of photo and without that stuff around the foreground aircraft I am sure it would have been on by now
Mick Bajcar


User currently offlineSkidmarks From UK - England, joined Dec 2004, 7121 posts, RR: 55
Reply 4, posted (7 years 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 3476 times:

While I respect the motiv rejection for this, I do however think that, as this is an overall shot of the ramp, the inclusion of the ground equipment is actually essential. It shows activity and projects a less sterile view of a line of aircraft tails.

Thats my view anyway. Although, having said that, I also think theat it would have been better to have included ALL the US Airways empennage and not chopped off the RH horizontal stab. Also if the baggage and container loaders were fully shown.

Andy  old 



Growing old is compulsory, growing up is optional
User currently offlineStealthZ From Australia, joined Feb 2005, 5688 posts, RR: 44
Reply 5, posted (7 years 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 3463 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Stuart,

Do you have the orginal of this shot that I or someone else could have a go at, I'm not sure it can be made good for Anet due to the reasons mentioned by Mick but I am positive there are improvements that could be made that will make it a very worthy addition to your personal collection.

Some of the things that jar for me are the glimpse of blue fin in the lower right corner, the equipment that kills it for Anet also loses more interest by being cut off and the clipped horiz. stab on the US A330.

Cheers

Chris



If your camera sends text messages, that could explain why your photos are rubbish!
User currently offlineGlobalpics From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 216 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (7 years 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 3453 times:

I personally would crop so as to loose the bit of Blue tail in the bottom right corner and also crop to include the whole of the rear horizontal stabilizer and maybe the whole of the A330 main under carriage  Smile

User currently offlineRaptors From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 180 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (7 years 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 3440 times:

Hi,

Thanks all, and especially to Mick the screeener who inteneded to leave a personal message. This is obviously very helpful even if it was just something like 'equipment'.

I'll check the original, and see what I can do, but atleast I know now for the future.

Thanks again,

Stuart



SSC/111/146/AR8/AT7/AN3/AB4/6/310/319/20/21/332/3/343/6/703/722/732-9/74L/2/4/F/752/3/772/3/W/E170/190/CR7/9
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Motiv Rejection - Help Needed posted Sun Sep 24 2006 22:37:37 by Raptors
Bad Motiv Rejection Help posted Wed Sep 20 2006 13:44:54 by Raptors
Fixed Level Portion, Questioning Motiv Rejection posted Sat Nov 18 2006 01:37:33 by Maiznblu_757
Rejection Help posted Thu Nov 2 2006 21:19:55 by Nbseer
Rejection Help - Info And Category posted Thu Nov 2 2006 11:16:26 by UA935
Quality Rejection Help Requested posted Mon Oct 30 2006 00:52:36 by Ptrjong
Soft Rejection Help posted Fri Oct 27 2006 22:54:51 by D L X
Rejection Help: Colour & Dark posted Fri Oct 27 2006 03:35:17 by TransIsland
Motion Blur Rejection - Help Please! posted Wed Oct 18 2006 00:44:13 by QantasA332
Rejection Help posted Sun Oct 8 2006 15:23:26 by TransIsland