Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Too Much Dead Space?  
User currently offlineLOCsta From United States of America, joined Sep 2006, 306 posts, RR: 9
Posted (6 years 7 months 4 weeks ago) and read 1984 times:		 Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Wanted to get some opinions on this shot....



Is there a problem with motiv?

Any opinions or comments would be much appreciated!

Thanks,

Kevin


Missed 4 chasing 1
8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2572 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (6 years 7 months 4 weeks ago) and read 1980 times:

Way too much dead space for a.net I'm afraid, distance rejection.

Darren


Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 53
Reply 2, posted (6 years 7 months 4 weeks ago) and read 1970 times:

Quoting LOCsta (Thread starter):
Is there a problem with motiv?

The motive is why you shot the photo in the first place.....I assume you liked it, or wouldn't have shot it. As for here, it will be a distance, quality, etc... and probably motive reject.

User currently offlineKnighty From Australia, joined Dec 2004, 207 posts, RR: 4
Reply 3, posted (6 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 1943 times:

Its a nice mountain, shame those 2 aircraft got in the way... Definite motive rejection on mountains.net!
It's a nice photo, just that it really isn't a photo of two aircraft in front of a mountain (see INN as an example), its a photo of a mountain with 2 aircraft in front of it, so for this site it'll be a motiv rejection for sure.

Knighty


Ian Knight - Proud Canon shooter!
User currently offlineLOCsta From United States of America, joined Sep 2006, 306 posts, RR: 9
Reply 4, posted (6 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 1875 times:		 Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

hehe, point taken.  Wink

I will submit it to mountains.net instead.

JeffM, you say quality, etc... could you elaborate a bit? Is it the image itself or the post processing? Just curious.

Thanks,

Kevin


Missed 4 chasing 1
User currently offlineLanas From Argentina, joined Aug 2006, 977 posts, RR: 15
Reply 5, posted (6 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 1871 times:

Quoting Knighty (Reply 3):
Definite motive rejection on mountains.net

LOL  laughing 

Kevin
I´d say your picture motiv is not correct. The mountain is not even in the center of the picture. Also it´s pretty soft and has a very low quality for a.net standards. You might like to notice that it´s also unlevel. Check out the poles all over the picture, they are needing some CW rotation.

Cheers!
Lanas.-


"Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens." J.R.R. Tolkien
User currently offlineBoeingOnFinal From Norway, joined Apr 2006, 476 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (6 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 1849 times:

Quoting Knighty (Reply 3):
Its a nice mountain, shame those 2 aircraft got in the way... Definite motive rejection on mountains.net!

I had to check if that was an actual site, apparantly it's not  Smile Thanks for the comedy!


norwegianpilot.blogspot.com
User currently offlineTransIsland From Bahamas, joined Mar 2004, 2031 posts, RR: 11
Reply 7, posted (6 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 1813 times:

Too bad there's so much heat haze, so it won't make it as an airport overview either.  Wink

Love the photo though, but I agree with Jeff's remark about the quality. The planes aren't sharp, and have a halo around them.


I'm an aviation expert. I have Sky Juice for breakfast.
User currently offlineLOCsta From United States of America, joined Sep 2006, 306 posts, RR: 9
Reply 8, posted (6 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 1774 times:		 Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

well unfortunately the photo was rejected on mountains.net  for plane obstructions
Thanks for the feed back, and now I am on a mission to get this damn Mount Rainer (btw, could only find 3 pics that included it in the DB) in a decent shot and at the same time get a decent shot period.  

Is this an improvement?


again, any feed back is much appreciated!

Thanks,
Kevin

[Edited 2006-09-29 09:15:12]


Missed 4 chasing 1
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Too Much Dead Space? posted Wed Jun 28 2006 17:17:45 by AirKas1
Too Much Jpeg Compression Rejection - Help Please posted Mon Sep 25 2006 00:16:24 by Acontador
Too Much Foreground Clutter? posted Mon Sep 18 2006 12:00:21 by Pavvyben
Too Much Fence? posted Sun Sep 17 2006 23:51:50 by Linco22
Too Much Jetwash? posted Thu Aug 24 2006 13:31:58 by INNflight
Too Much Clutter Around This Bird? posted Fri May 5 2006 08:02:32 by 777MechSys
Help - Backlit Too Much Or Acceptable? posted Fri Feb 24 2006 08:27:12 by Frippe
Too Much Jpeg Compression? posted Thu Feb 9 2006 21:07:17 by Linco22
Too Much Noise? posted Thu Jan 5 2006 02:43:40 by CFIjames
Too Much Crop? posted Thu Dec 29 2005 18:30:59 by Cadet57