Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Will This Be Considered Double?  
User currently offlineN178UA From United Arab Emirates, joined Jan 2001, 1670 posts, RR: 66
Posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 4280 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hi just want to get a view from screening team about the following 2 pictures.

If I upload both of them, will they be considered as double? Understand both are takeoff but you see their different perspective.

Image are reduced quality

http://www.samchuiphotos.com/Sydney/AKLD3117.jpg

http://www.samchuiphotos.com/Sydney/AKLD3121.jpg

I've seen a few occasions there are 2 shots allowed recently, so i am unsure there is rules change. Sometimes i like both shots and really would like to upload both with success  Smile

20 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTimdegroot From Netherlands, joined Apr 2002, 3674 posts, RR: 64
Reply 1, posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 4272 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I'd upload the 2nd one Sam.

Tim



Alderman Exit
User currently offlineThierryD From Luxembourg, joined Dec 2005, 2069 posts, RR: 51
Reply 2, posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 4267 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SUPPORT

Well Sam, if you can't make up your mind, upload the 2nd one; much cooler shot and a nice change from the "usual" runway background!
Both shots are pretty nice though  Wink

Thierry



"Go ahead...make my day"
User currently offlineLasham From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2005, 226 posts, RR: 17
Reply 3, posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 4222 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Quoting N178UA (Thread starter):
If I upload both of them, will they be considered as double

Yes as only a few seconds apart. But I like the 2nd shot.

Tony



No sun no fun
User currently offlineFUAirliner From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 538 posts, RR: 3
Reply 4, posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 4188 times:

While I agree that the background in the second shot is indeed more spectacular and interesting I find the reflection on the aircraft quite disturbing. And it's not only a small reflection, but running over the whole fuselage. I would perhaps upload the first one if I was able to produce such great images!  Smile

Nevertheless, both pictures are absolutely stunning!


Frank



Frank Unterspann - Hamburg, Germany
User currently offlineLHRsunriser From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2004, 399 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 4177 times:

I like the top down view of the 2nd. Safe shots

Cheers Dom



Getting back into it
User currently offlineBoeingOnFinal From Norway, joined Apr 2006, 476 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 4155 times:

All I gotta say is WOW. Nice catch!


norwegianpilot.blogspot.com
User currently offlineTristarYUL From Chile, joined Jan 2005, 101 posts, RR: 27
Reply 7, posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 4110 times:

Sam,
go for the second shot

Eric



AirTeamImages
User currently offlineEadster From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2216 posts, RR: 14
Reply 8, posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 4077 times:

Go for the second. Screeners think its safer too!

User currently offlineCathay111 From Australia, joined Oct 2006, 55 posts, RR: 15
Reply 9, posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 4037 times:

I really like the first shot, it offers alot more perspective than the second and doesn't have the awful glare that's evident in the climb out shot.

The colours and contrast in shot one blow shot two away. The dull and lifeless water in shot two does nothing to compliment the awesome Air Tahiti Nui livery.

Fine work Sam, fine work.


User currently offlineJogales From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 437 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 4021 times:

I'd go with the first one. I like how the colorful fuselage stands out from the grey runway and green grass. And as others have mentioned, it doesn't have the distracting reflection. Either way, great shots!  bigthumbsup 


-
User currently offlineN178UA From United Arab Emirates, joined Jan 2001, 1670 posts, RR: 66
Reply 11, posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 4014 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Thanks, I have a couple more without glares, but for some reason i prefer that shot with glare overwater better...i know how weired i am  Wink but out of those 2 pics, I think I agree with Craigo on this one !  Smile If they allow 2, i would go for 2 of course!

User currently offlineRotate From Switzerland, joined Feb 2003, 1491 posts, RR: 16
Reply 12, posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 3952 times:

What the Hell? Both should be Direct Adds to the DB  Smile

WOW!

Hard to Top. You did it again ...

Robin



ABC
User currently offlinePtrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 3906 posts, RR: 19
Reply 13, posted (7 years 10 months 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 3899 times:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Peter de Jong



http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/Il-28-72ptr.jpg

Humbler pictures, same question. Same aircraft (the closest one in the first shot), shot the same day. Different enough?

Peter Smile



The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
User currently offlinePtrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 3906 posts, RR: 19
Reply 14, posted (7 years 10 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 3831 times:

...anybody?



The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
User currently offlineThierryD From Luxembourg, joined Dec 2005, 2069 posts, RR: 51
Reply 15, posted (7 years 10 months 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 3808 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SUPPORT

Well Peter, I'd say that would be a double rejection as it's a preserved a/c so the sequence - if you wanna call it that way - is exactly the same but shot from another angle.
And I don't like the 2nd shot anyway  Wink the grey background ruins it for me.

Thierry



"Go ahead...make my day"
User currently offlinePtrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 3906 posts, RR: 19
Reply 16, posted (7 years 10 months 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 3788 times:

Well, the thing is that there are three preserved aircraft of which I have a second photo, shot on the same day, in the database. I don't think these were accepted in error, so it seems to be acceptable sometimes. Admittedly, in these cases the difference in angle was greater.

When I started editing this Il-28 shot I didn't realize that it was the same a/c I already had in the db. I'm happy to pull it if it's felt to be against the rules or even the ethics of the site, but I could do with some clarification.

Peter Smile



The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
User currently offlineN178UA From United Arab Emirates, joined Jan 2001, 1670 posts, RR: 66
Reply 17, posted (7 years 10 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 3783 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I ain't a screener but I see differences in motive, composition of 2 photos. the one accepted in DB don't show the front nose of Il28. I hope they make it.  Smile

User currently offlinePtrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 3906 posts, RR: 19
Reply 18, posted (7 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3650 times:

Seems to be acceptable.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Peter de Jong




The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
User currently offlineThierryD From Luxembourg, joined Dec 2005, 2069 posts, RR: 51
Reply 19, posted (7 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3645 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SUPPORT

Quoting Ptrjong (Reply 18):
Seems to be acceptable.

Thanks for the update Peter, though I still don't like it. Couldn't you have painted the sky blue!? Big grin

Thierry



"Go ahead...make my day"
User currently offlinePtrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 3906 posts, RR: 19
Reply 20, posted (7 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 3632 times:

Thierry, I like the Il-28 so much. Hey, even Sam likes it even though it's military!


The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Would This Be Considered A "bad" Double? posted Tue May 23 2006 05:22:02 by Je89_w
An12 T/off Frm Over My Roof? Will It Be Bad Double posted Mon Aug 7 2006 00:09:46 by AirMalta
Will This Be A NOA_double? posted Tue May 23 2006 17:31:18 by Aero145
Would This Be Bad Double posted Wed Apr 26 2006 11:28:15 by CallMeCapt
Will This Be Bad Distance? posted Fri Jan 27 2006 18:24:14 by Aitek
Will This Be NOA_dark? posted Tue Sep 27 2005 19:26:45 by AirKas1
Will This Be BadMotive? posted Sat Aug 20 2005 19:27:12 by WILCO737
Will This Be Baddouble? posted Mon Feb 7 2005 17:28:11 by AirKas1
Will This Be Accepted? posted Fri Jan 21 2005 06:22:04 by Danielcarlos
Will This Be Rejected For Bad Motive? posted Sun Nov 14 2004 13:43:12 by Dahlgardo