NIKV69 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 2, posted (6 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 3970 times:
Well one thing that comes to mind is the engine is cut off and the angle of the shot is a bit different. I am no expert in shots like this but look at the two pics you posted as comparisons. Much cleaner, nothing cut off and and angle of the shot has it a little more downward and it just adds so much more to the shot. Yours has the viewer looking up in space and I just feel not seeing the entire engine takes a little away.
Newark777 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 9348 posts, RR: 33 Reply 3, posted (6 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 3967 times:
There's a lot of dead space, with nothing that interesting in the top right.
Dendrobatid From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 1605 posts, RR: 64 Reply 5, posted (6 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 3957 times:
Behind the winglet, a brown area that looks like some sort of a reflection would be my guesss at motive.
Newark777 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 9348 posts, RR: 33 Reply 7, posted (6 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 3923 times:
Quoting Spencer (Reply 6):
Seems the first pic has the engine cut off too.....
But that one has some interesting clouds and mountains to show.
I recognise I do have some kind of ENVY watching where are you flying
I'm happy to see you have such opportunities..
About the rejection ( Spencer's one..) at least to my eyes the winglet is not focused/not sharp and the engine is cut off. The sky is not showing anything interesting... If the reason was the brown area as Mick says It would be a quality call instead of motive...
Spencer From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2004, 1624 posts, RR: 19 Reply 12, posted (6 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 3904 times:
Winglet focus looks fine to me. Now, is A.net an aircraft site, or a nature site? Should I make sure I shoot these kind of shots when and if I'm passing the Alps next time, with of course some beautiful cloud formations????
Spencer.
EOS1D4, 7D, 30D, 100-400/4.5-5.6 L IS USM, 70-200/2.8 L IS2 USM, 17-40 f4 L USM, 24-105 f4 L IS USM, 85 f1.8 USM
DC10Tim From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2005, 1405 posts, RR: 16 Reply 13, posted (6 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 3883 times:
Spencer it's a nice shot, but there really isn't anything to look at in the whole top right corner, new winglet or not. I'm guessing that's where the rejection came from.
I got told it might get caused by the background - I don't think that the background can ruin this shot cause I found it very interesting. What are your opinions? Maybe a screener can tell me the truth.
Thanks for your help and forgive me that I posted it again, but I thought this new started thread will get more attention thru it's title.
Airplanepics From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2003, 2725 posts, RR: 45 Reply 16, posted (6 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 3883 times:
Quoting Spencer (Reply 12): Winglet focus looks fine to me. Now, is A.net an aircraft site, or a nature site? Should I make sure I shoot these kind of shots when and if I'm passing the Alps next time, with of course some beautiful cloud formations????
Spencer, I've told you this before - you need to fly on bad weather day's! That way you'll get decent cloud and effects so you can upload them to airliners, when will you listen?!
Oh and by the way, I can't find anything wrong with the pic, nice shot. Keep it in your personal collection, it's a.net's loss, not yours!
When you coming back over to the UK Spence? Maybe it's time I start looking at flights to GOT/GSE again!
Newark777 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 9348 posts, RR: 33 Reply 18, posted (6 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 3853 times:
Newark777 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 9348 posts, RR: 33 Reply 20, posted (6 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 3829 times:
Quoting EZYAirbus (Reply 19): Wing and winglet would be a good place to start i reckon!
Well, that covers about 1/3 of the picture, then...