Motive! — Aviation Photography Forum

Sponsor Message:


My Starred Topics \| Profile \| New Topic \| Forum Index \| Help \| Search

Motive!

Yanqui67 From Puerto Rico, joined Jan 2005, 505 posts, RR: 3
Posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 876 times:

I am getting very frustrated, what do you screeners want?
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...name=20061011_10406N655DLATLaa.jpg

[Edited 2006-10-11 22:33:49]

8 replies: All unread, jump to last

FighterPilot From Canada, joined Jun 2005, 1324 posts, RR: 24
Reply 1, posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 860 times:

IMO, the main gear is being obscured by the bridge, and the tunnel is taking you eyes away from the aircraft.

Cal

*Insert Sound Of GE90 Spooling Up Here*

9V From China, joined Aug 2008, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 860 times:

Quoting Yanqui67 (Thread starter):
what do you screeners want?

Blood!!!!! Big grin

But seriously, that tube on the left really distracts your eye from the aircraft. Justified motive rejection IMO. Smile

Clickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9444 posts, RR: 72
Reply 3, posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 860 times:

AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Should have also gotten an editing call out, those Delta colors are way too neon...

Not sure about the motiv, it is close, but the colors will kill it on appeal

Psych From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 2968 posts, RR: 60
Reply 4, posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 841 times:

Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hello Agustin.

I agree with Royal that the colours are the first thing to strike me on opening up the photo (the red is too saturated). That and a visible dust spot a few centimetres above the flightdeck.

I think if it was just the tunnel then maybe it would be okay, but it is all the other distracting 'stuff' there too which causes the trouble for you I think - that 'tube' on the left, and then the obtrusive signs and fencing. That, together with the construction equipment behind the aircraft, is plenty to get the motive rejection, I am afraid.

All the best.

Paul

Yanqui67 From Puerto Rico, joined Jan 2005, 505 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 785 times:

I agree with the Neon color but I dont agree with the motive rejection. Atlanta airport is in some serious new construction and I want to show whats going on. That was my motive, the aircraft is clearly centered with no obstructions. I guess I should only shoot side on shots from now on since thats pretty much what this site has become. A color rejection I agree, motive no. Ill go back to the drawing board with some boring side on shots. Thanks for the comments guys.
Agustin

Bubbles From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1193 posts, RR: 52
Reply 6, posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 768 times:

Quoting Yanqui67 (Reply 5):
I agree with the Neon color but I dont agree with the motive rejection.

Hello Agustin

I shouldn't say I don't agree. But at least I am not quite sure where the motive comes from, either. I think the current #2 of hot shots of last 24/48 hours looks much more cluttered and distracting than yours. I mean this one ...

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Weimeng

Well, but this one made it. So I think probably there is something else that we all haven't yet identified causing this motive rejection.

Just my two cents.

_Hongyin_

GOCAPS16 From Japan, joined Jan 2000, 4298 posts, RR: 23
Reply 7, posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 744 times:

What I would do is fix the "neon" colors and upload again. Perhaps, a different screener will like the motive and accept it. Am I right?

Kevin

Shep From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 743 times:

Lots of "hot" colors added lately of Delta...

But then again, what do I know...

Smile

Top Of Page

Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics: