Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Quality Rejection Specific Reason?  
User currently offlineOlympus69 From Canada, joined Jun 2002, 1737 posts, RR: 7
Posted (8 years 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 2729 times:

These 2 photos were rejected for Quality, with no other reason given. What specifically might be wrong with the quality?
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...in?filename=20061017_jal744n05.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...in?filename=20061017_jal744n10.jpg
Thanks for any suggestions.

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineWhyWhyZed From Canada, joined Jan 2005, 914 posts, RR: 16
Reply 1, posted (8 years 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 2718 times:

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...in?filename=20061017_jal744n05.jpg

heathaze, overexposed, jagged, and the list goes on...

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...in?filename=20061017_jal744n10.jpg

heathaze, overexposed, jagged, and whats with the greyish white gradient from the left, that goes into until about 2 inches.


User currently offlinePsych From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 3052 posts, RR: 58
Reply 2, posted (8 years 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 2718 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hello John.

I am afraid there is quite a lot wrong with these photos as regards meeting A.net quality standards.

Both shots are not correctly exposed - the white fuselage looks 'burned out'. Also neither photo is sharp enough and the heat haze is a killer. From those perspectives they are immediate quality rejections.

Cheers.

Paul


User currently offline9V From China, joined Aug 2008, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (8 years 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 2718 times:

Main problem looks like too much heat haze!

User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 51
Reply 4, posted (8 years 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 2697 times:

Quoting Olympus69 (Thread starter):
What specifically might be wrong with the quality?

Really bad exposure on both.


User currently offlineOlympus69 From Canada, joined Jun 2002, 1737 posts, RR: 7
Reply 5, posted (8 years 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 2680 times:

Quoting WhyWhyZed (Reply 1):
heathaze, overexposed, jagged, and whats with the greyish white gradient from the left, that goes into until about 2 inches.

It's probably something to do with the fence I was shooting through.

Thanks all, for the critique. I'm beginning to think that some of my problems are due to processing my photos on a laptop. Screen angle seems to be more critical than with a desktop monitor.


User currently offlineOlympus69 From Canada, joined Jun 2002, 1737 posts, RR: 7
Reply 6, posted (8 years 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 2680 times:

Quoting WhyWhyZed (Reply 1):
heathaze, overexposed, jagged, and whats with the greyish white gradient from the left, that goes into until about 2 inches.

It's probably something to do with the fence I was shooting through.

Thanks all, for the critique. I'm beginning to think that some of my problems are due to processing my photos on a laptop. Screen angle seems to be more critical than with a desktop monitor.


User currently offlineTancrede From Finland, joined May 2006, 245 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (8 years 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 2644 times:

And what about that one? It is say that it is oversharpened. How can fix the problem. I don't own photoshop and honestly, I don't know a lot about photography, but I thought that this picture was quite good. Anyone has an idea about how to make this picture going through A.net screening?
Big version: Width: 2048 Height: 1536 File size: 641kb


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Quality Rejection Help Requested posted Mon Oct 30 2006 00:52:36 by Ptrjong
Quality Rejection Advice posted Sun Oct 22 2006 19:34:08 by Linco22
Quality Rejection: Not Level? posted Fri Oct 20 2006 23:32:17 by KBFIspotter
Help With Quality Rejection posted Fri Sep 29 2006 11:38:26 by UnattendedBag
Help With 'quality ' Rejection Please. posted Sun Sep 24 2006 12:30:39 by Nucky
Quality Rejection - Panning Shot posted Thu Sep 14 2006 23:59:16 by McG1967
Quality Rejection - Advice Please posted Mon Sep 11 2006 21:24:14 by UA935
Quality Rejection Advice Requested posted Sat Aug 26 2006 20:21:39 by 747 4-ever
Quality Rejection Advice Please posted Sun Aug 13 2006 10:44:40 by Kukkudrill
Quality Rejection Help Please posted Sat Jul 29 2006 12:29:37 by Kukkudrill