Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Thinking About A New Lens.  
User currently offlineAvsfan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (8 years 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 3574 times:

Hello to all of the Nikon users out there.

I am thinking about purchasing a new lens for my Nikon D70. Right now I shoot with a Tamron 70-300mm f4-5.6 telephoto with macro feature. Along with aviation photography, I am looking at expanding to photographing sports such as ice hockey. I would like to get a lens with VR capability, but those are out of my budget/price range. I have been looking at the Nikon 80-200mm f/2.8D ED AF Zoom. I am curious to know how much better quality photos will I get with the Nikon 80-200mm f/2.8D ED AF Zoom lens. If there is a big increase in photo quality, will I have to spend less time post-processing photos? I would love to try and reduce the post-processing of the sharpness and things like that.

Comments and suggestions are welcome.

Louis

NOTE: Wilddigital.com has the 70-200mm f/2.8 for $754 and then there is a $50 rebate from Nikon.

6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineIngemarE From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (8 years 1 month 3 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 3542 times:

Your link shows an AF-S 80-200 2,8, which isn't the same as the one advertized for 750$!! Beware! (The AF-S-variant usually goes for around 850$ used, so that's your clue!)

Yes, you will notice a great difference in picture quality, if you go from the Tamron 70-300.
Will it significantly reduce your post-processing work load? I doubt it!

Myself, I have found the Sigma EX-series to be of excellent standard. High glass-quality, combined with fast focusing and a reasonable price makes them winners in my book!

Of course, if you can get your hands on an AF-S 80-200 for 750$, by all means do get your hands on it. 'Cause it's a killer-lens!!


User currently offlineAvsfan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (8 years 1 month 3 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 3501 times:

Quoting IngemarE (Reply 1):
Your link shows an AF-S 80-200 2,8, which isn't the same as the one advertized for 750$!!

Then what is the link showing because it says "Nikon Zoom Telephoto AF Zoom Nikkor 80-200 f/2.8D ED Autofocus Lens". I put 70-200mm f/2.8 in the note when I should have put 80-200mm (so many numbers going through my noggin'). Since I am looking at the 80-200mm f/2.8 and if that is what the link advertises, I take it that is a good deal?

What are some good links that you know of for the Sigma EX-series of lenses? I have heard/read good and bad things about the Sigma Lenses.


User currently offlineCalgaryBill From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (8 years 1 month 3 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 3470 times:

One thing I'd caution with the AF lens is that focusing is slow. I sold mine and got the AF-S 70-200 F2.8 VR. It focuses faster, and it doesn't hunt as much trying to lock on fast moving objects.

I can't compare it to the Tamron you have, but you might miss having 300 on the long end.

B


User currently offlineIngemarE From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (8 years 1 month 3 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 3469 times:

There are two, no actually three different kinds of Nikkor 80-200 f2,8's; The push-pull kind, the two-ring(or two-touch, as some prefer to call it) whithout internal focusing motor and then the AF-S kind which has an internal so called Silent Wave Motor (equivalent to Canon's USM and Sigma's HSM).

There is a clear difference in focusing-speed between the AF-S and the non-AF-S's. Optically however, I doubt you would notice the difference.
I've had a two-ring 80-200 once myself and I was very happy with it. Can really recommend it!

Regarding the Sigma EX-series, I would have to say that almost all of them are more than good enough for the kind of shooting we do. ....and they have a much sweeter pricetag than do the Nikkor's and Canon's!!


User currently offlineCodeshare From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (8 years 1 month 3 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 3464 times:

I've been using the 80-200 f/2.8 D ED for the last two years. It proved to be my workhorse lens. It's solid and a great performer. But the only thing better than it is the 70-200 VR, which I got just recently. It's a real stunner.

You also might have a look at the new Nikkor AF-S 70-300 VR lens.

KS/codeshare


User currently offlineAvsfan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (8 years 1 month 3 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 3450 times:

Quoting CalgaryBill (Reply 3):
I can't compare it to the Tamron you have, but you might miss having 300 on the long end.

That is one thing I have thought about, however I have no plans on getting rid of the Tamron70-300mm for right now. I would like to have the 80-200mm or 70-200mm f/2.8 lens for indoor and lowlight photography.

Quoting IngemarE (Reply 4):
Regarding the Sigma EX-series, I would have to say that almost all of them are more than good enough for the kind of shooting we do. ....and they have a much sweeter pricetag than do the Nikkor's and Canon's!!

I will do futher research on the Sigma lenses.

Quoting Codeshare (Reply 5):
But the only thing better than it is the 70-200 VR, which I got just recently. It's a real stunner.

I would love that, but is most likely out of my price range.

Quoting Codeshare (Reply 5):
You also might have a look at the new Nikkor AF-S 70-300 VR lens.

I am looking at this lens also...mainly for the VR and price. The only downfall would be the f-stop range on it.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Thinking About A Sigma 50-150 F2.8 posted Sat Nov 18 2006 17:51:58 by 9V
Rejects With New Lens posted Sun Nov 5 2006 18:43:13 by Manc
Results With New Lens posted Sat Sep 2 2006 23:31:06 by Psyops
A Quick Note If You Are Thinking About Appealing posted Thu Aug 17 2006 15:28:45 by Clickhappy
Help Processing With A New Lens! posted Sun Jul 16 2006 11:48:38 by Dazbo5
New Lens Help: Canon L 300mm Vs. 400mm posted Wed Apr 5 2006 13:42:45 by Danpio
New Camera Or New Lens? posted Wed Apr 5 2006 07:07:35 by Seachaz
Getting A New Lens For Christmas... Dilema posted Mon Dec 12 2005 03:28:48 by Syncmaster
Looking To Buy A New Lens posted Tue Nov 15 2005 19:51:45 by Virgin7
Thinking About Appealing 2 Shots posted Tue Sep 27 2005 03:04:35 by WakeTurbulence