Clarification Of The Double Rule — Aviation Photography Forum

Sponsor Message:


My Starred Topics \| Profile \| New Topic \| Forum Index \| Help \| Search

Clarification Of The Double Rule

Timdegroot From Netherlands, joined Apr 2002, 3674 posts, RR: 67
Posted (6 years 7 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2377 times:

Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hi All

Since you all seem to appreciate clarification of the rules I thought I do a post on double, which many people don't seem to understand correctly yet.

A big part of double rejections comes from what I'd like to call "analytical cropping", where someone uploads a normal sideshot and subsequently uploads a nose closeup and a tail closeup. This is not allowed. You have the choice between either uploading the sideshot or both closeups, but you can't do both.

Hope this helps

Tim

Alderman Exit

9 replies: All unread, jump to last

Cosec59 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (6 years 7 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2369 times:

Quoting Timdegroot (Thread starter):
tail closeup

Thanks for the clarification Tim, but I was under the impression tail close ups were now frowned upon.

Timdegroot From Netherlands, joined Apr 2002, 3674 posts, RR: 67
Reply 2, posted (6 years 7 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2365 times:

As long as the focus of the photo is not a logo they are still allowed.

Tim

Alderman Exit

Cosec59 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (6 years 7 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2365 times:

Quoting Timdegroot (Reply 2):
As long as the focus of the photo is not a logo they are still allowed.

Tim

So why else would you take a tail shot?

Timdegroot From Netherlands, joined Apr 2002, 3674 posts, RR: 67
Reply 4, posted (6 years 7 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2359 times:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Peter de Jong

Now if he'd zoomed in on the logo it would have been motive

Tim

Alderman Exit

Jorge1812 From Germany, joined Apr 2004, 3144 posts, RR: 9
Reply 5, posted (6 years 7 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2359 times:

Thanks for the info, hope many people will read this. What about a side on and a front/rear view? Doubles? Yes I think and got told in another thread, but I'm not sure.

Georg

Timdegroot From Netherlands, joined Apr 2002, 3674 posts, RR: 67
Reply 6, posted (6 years 7 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2359 times:

Georg, yes double as well unless very "different". I'm sure some recent examples exist.

Tim

Alderman Exit

JRadier From Netherlands, joined Sep 2004, 4599 posts, RR: 51
Reply 7, posted (6 years 7 months 3 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 2328 times:

Not to burn the photographer (the shots are terriffic), but how does this fit in the motiv rule? both are in flight. Besides these there is an approach shot and a panel shot as well, but they are very difirent.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

For once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards, for there you have been and ther

Jorge1812 From Germany, joined Apr 2004, 3144 posts, RR: 9
Reply 8, posted (6 years 7 months 3 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 2318 times:

Quoting JRadier (Reply 7):

I think for such exceptional pics exceptions can and are made.

Georg

Ptrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 3779 posts, RR: 20
Reply 9, posted (6 years 7 months 3 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 2313 times:

Quoting JRadier (Reply 7):

One slipped through I guess. Who cares.

Peter

The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)

Top Of Page

Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics: