Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Fourth Appeal?  
User currently offlineCYEGsTankers From Canada, joined Oct 2004, 245 posts, RR: 1
Posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 2414 times:

Well, I tried four times to get this in, but it seems hopeless.

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...g/20061107_Nov102004N710SKdark.jpg

Rejections in order:

A: Blurry
B: Oversharpened
C: Contrasts/
D: and the ever so popular "MOTIVE".

Any suggestions?
Richard

17 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2913 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 2377 times:

Quoting CYEGsTankers (Thread starter):
Any suggestions?

I suspect there isn't much that can be done with this shot, unsalvagable. One for your own collection I'm afraid.

Darren



Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
User currently offlineIL76 From Netherlands, joined Jan 2004, 2237 posts, RR: 48
Reply 2, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 2362 times:

Quoting CYEGsTankers (Thread starter):
A: Blurry

You can't fix "blurry", and if you do, you get:

Quoting CYEGsTankers (Thread starter):
B: Oversharpened


[Edited 2006-11-07 09:48:21]

User currently offlineCodeshare From Poland, joined Sep 2002, 1854 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 2347 times:

Redo again from scratch. BTW were you using a filter on the lens, because the light from the masts looks strange.

KS/codeshare



How much A is there is Airliners Net ? 0 or nothing ?
User currently offlineMarkJBeckwith From Canada, joined Jul 2005, 156 posts, RR: 3
Reply 4, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 2296 times:

Quoting IL76 (Reply 2):
Quoting CYEGsTankers (Thread starter):
A: Blurry

You can't fix "blurry", and if you do, you get:

Quoting CYEGsTankers (Thread starter):
B: Oversharpened


And if you have consistent screening you would get MOTIVE first time around, wouldn't you?

Quoting CYEGsTankers (Thread starter):
D: and the ever so popular "MOTIVE".



One day, I might be good at this...
User currently offlineIL76 From Netherlands, joined Jan 2004, 2237 posts, RR: 48
Reply 5, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 2292 times:

Quoting MarkJBeckwith (Reply 4):

And if you have consistent screening you would get MOTIVE first time around, wouldn't you?

If you have 30 cloned human beings, yes...


User currently offlineINNflight From Switzerland, joined Apr 2004, 3766 posts, RR: 59
Reply 6, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 2279 times:

Can't see the point of wanting to appeal a shot that was rejected 4 (!) times for different reasons....?! Won't get online here, time to move on I'd say..?


Jet Visuals
User currently offlineCodeshare From Poland, joined Sep 2002, 1854 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 2272 times:

I just had a look at the photo and found out that the whole sky is cropped out! That's badmanipulation IMHO.

KS/codeshare



How much A is there is Airliners Net ? 0 or nothing ?
User currently offlineINNflight From Switzerland, joined Apr 2004, 3766 posts, RR: 59
Reply 8, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 2258 times:

Quoting Codeshare (Reply 7):
I just had a look at the photo and found out that the whole sky is cropped out! That's badmanipulation IMHO.

Looks like Richard feared his skies would be tooooo grainy.... oh oh  beady 



Jet Visuals
User currently offlineLinco22 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 1380 posts, RR: 15
Reply 9, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 2245 times:

Richard,

I don't think its salvagable.

Is there any particular reason you have appealed it 4 times?

Regards
Colin  Smile


User currently offlineEadster From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2216 posts, RR: 14
Reply 10, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 2191 times:

4 times?? Man oh man!

I have to say this so I appologise in advance....

Can you honestly say that this particular pic is the same quality/standard as anything on the top of last 24 hours?

Look at the grain, look at the jaggies, look at the overall colour. A little bit of extra self screening or asking others for opinions could have helped a lot here.


User currently offlineMaiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 50
Reply 11, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 2173 times:

Florian,

With a rejection rate like yours, do you have any idea of what is or isnt an acceptable anet photo yourself?  Wink  Big grin and yes, this was a J O K E.

I do agree though, this is a shot for the personal collection, not for anet.


User currently offlineGOCAPS16 From Japan, joined Jan 2000, 4346 posts, RR: 20
Reply 12, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 2170 times:

Yup, if a.net wont accept it, either upload it someplace else or keep it for collection. Sorry.

User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 51
Reply 13, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 2131 times:

Quoting CYEGsTankers (Thread starter):
Any suggestions?

Keep trying!  rotfl 


User currently offlineFighterPilot From Canada, joined Jun 2005, 1391 posts, RR: 22
Reply 14, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 2122 times:

Quoting JeffM (Reply 13):
Keep trying!

 Wink



*Insert Sound Of GE90 Spooling Up Here*
User currently offlineINNflight From Switzerland, joined Apr 2004, 3766 posts, RR: 59
Reply 15, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 2101 times:

Quoting Maiznblu_757 (Reply 11):
With a rejection rate like yours, do you have any idea of what is or isnt an acceptable anet photo yourself?

Not really sure anymore I guess. I tend to find out that quite some of mine aren't by just appealing them  Smile



Jet Visuals
User currently offlineAviatorG From St. Lucia, joined Apr 2005, 264 posts, RR: 1
Reply 16, posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 1998 times:

Quoting CYEGsTankers (Thread starter):
Any suggestions?

How about give up? I've made the mistake of dragging my acceptance ratio down severly by being 'too persistant' with shots I thought were great. I would give up now if I were you (especially after 4 rejections). My advice would be to try a similar but improved shot in the future, and see how that turns out. Good luck  Wink.


User currently offlineCYEGsTankers From Canada, joined Oct 2004, 245 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 1980 times:

Alrighty then, I removed them from the Que.
Richard


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Rejection Advice - Worth An Appeal? posted Thu Nov 2 2006 14:40:47 by UA935
You Vote, Should I Appeal This Night Shot? posted Sat Oct 28 2006 18:49:20 by Atomother
Distance Rejection,Appeal? posted Thu Oct 26 2006 20:59:03 by Ranger703
In The Should I Appeal Series posted Sun Sep 3 2006 00:08:37 by DC9
Should I Appeal This "landmark" Shot At Jeffco? posted Fri Aug 4 2006 06:39:37 by Atomother
How Long Does The Appeal Process Take posted Wed Jul 19 2006 14:00:51 by Parsival
Should I Appeal?, Quality Rejection. posted Mon Jul 17 2006 22:44:19 by Yanqui67
Is This Photo Worth An Appeal? posted Sun Jul 9 2006 16:22:14 by AIRBUSRIDER
Do These Work? And Appeal This? posted Sun Jun 25 2006 21:05:40 by ATCme
Badinfo... --> Should I Appeal? posted Mon May 15 2006 22:44:14 by AirKas1