It was rejected for dirty because of the two stars in the shot said to be broken pixels by the screener who rejected it. I even put in my comment something like, "...sitting under the stars" since two stars were noticeable in the shot. What do you all think?
Dendrobatid From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 1694 posts, RR: 61
Reply 3, posted (8 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 3837 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW HEAD SCREENER
Quoting DLX737200 (Reply 2): I just did, thus the edit of the post. However, I messed up and clicked the appeal without typing a reason for the appeal. How can I fix this IL76?
You can't fix that and, as you know, if no justification is given for the appeal it is rejected.
I would suggest removing the appeal before it costs you another 2% on your acceptances and start all over again
DLX737200 From United States of America, joined May 2001, 1964 posts, RR: 19
Reply 4, posted (8 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 3717 times:
Well too late for that. It was already rejected for dirty again. I do not understand why screeners cannot see the comment mentioning the stars then reject it for those stars because they assume they are broken pixels.
In addition, I had a friend upload a shot once with bees in the shot and it initally got rejected for dirty as well but after a head screener realized it, they had him reupload it and accepted it immediately because they realized it wasn't dust or broken pixels. How come this cannot be done to this photo? I'd really just like to see this photo be in the database without having to wait another week.