Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Pre-Screening Advice  
User currently offlineANITIX87 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 3292 posts, RR: 13
Posted (7 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 3391 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hey, guys!

Wanted to ask for some advice on a few shots. A couple of them have already been asked about here, but I looked at them all again recently, and re-edited quite a bunch.

I have four shots to share with you.

Let me know if you think they are of a.net standards, and if not, what I can do improve them.

http://www.tisdigital.com/aviationN76151.jpg

http://www.tisdigital.com/aviationgeupw.jpg

http://www.tisdigital.com/aviationf16.jpg

http://www.tisdigital.com/aviationsr712.jpg

Also, here's the link to the homepage those shots came from, if anyone's interested in seeing some of my other aviation shots and quite a few non-aviation shots.
My Website!

TIS


www.stellaryear.com: Canon EOS 50D, Canon EOS 5DMkII, Sigma 50mm 1.4, Canon 24-70 2.8L II, Canon 100mm 2.8L, Canon 100-4
13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 52
Reply 1, posted (7 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 3387 times:

1. soft, level, quality
2. soft, level, quality
3. motive, dark, quality, soft
4. motive, dark, quality, soft

Quoting ANITIX87 (Thread starter):
Let me know if you think they are of a.net standards, and if not, what I can do improve them.

I'd say no. The reasons above need to be fixed, but it might be a stretch on these photos.


User currently offlineAirMalta From Malta, joined Mar 2006, 394 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (7 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 3381 times:

No1
looks like Jeff said 'soft'however pay attention since you might jag the titles by overharp it but need slight sharpness also I would try to use the curves to darken a little bit.Need around .6 CW rotation

No2

Quoting JeffM (Reply 1):
soft

Also .8 CW needed

No 3 and 4 need increase slight the curves for brightness.

Malcolm


User currently offlineEadster From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2216 posts, RR: 14
Reply 3, posted (7 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 3378 times:

3 and 4 forget - too much in the way of much of the aircraft.

1 & 2 don't totally write off. Might be some chance there, although the 767 has a "boxed in" feel with those buildings in the foreground and 2 will get motive because you've cut the wing tip off for no real reason. Will have to rework if possible.

Quoting AirMalta (Reply 2):
however pay attention since you might jag the titles by overharp it

Thats where you use selective sharpening.

[Edited 2006-11-10 06:10:20]

User currently offlineAviatorG From St. Lucia, joined Apr 2005, 264 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (7 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 3305 times:

1st shot would have been excellent to pan. Nice way to try blur out the buildings in the foreground. I would also have included the winglet on #2 (BA).

User currently offlineANITIX87 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 3292 posts, RR: 13
Reply 5, posted (7 years 5 months 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 3244 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Thanks, guys. I have scrapped those four photos by taking into account a combination of everyone's advice.

Here's another shot. For some reason I am unable to upload to my profile, so I have already put this one in the queue. I am quite confident that it will be accepted since it was taken with identical settings as the other GVA shot from the same day.

Is there anything blatantly wrong with it?

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/HBJZH_1.JPG

TIS



www.stellaryear.com: Canon EOS 50D, Canon EOS 5DMkII, Sigma 50mm 1.4, Canon 24-70 2.8L II, Canon 100mm 2.8L, Canon 100-4
User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 52
Reply 6, posted (7 years 5 months 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 3239 times:

Quoting ANITIX87 (Reply 5):
Is there anything blatantly wrong with it?

The centering leaves something to be desired. And I don't like the wing and tail cropped off. I'd say bad motive in addition to the centering issue.


The nose looks a little 'hot' as well.


User currently offlineAcontador From Chile, joined Jul 2005, 1417 posts, RR: 31
Reply 7, posted (7 years 5 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 3227 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Hi Antonis,

Don't want to be pessimistic, but I think your picture as shown will not be accepted. There are already 46 pics of this particular reg/aircraft in the DB, and your picture (besides any motive problems) looks slightly blurry/soft Just have a look at the engine cowlings and the wording below the ".com" and you will see what I mean. Additionally, the upper nose section looks overexpossed (but this could be addressed), and along the upper fuselage (the spine?) of the plane you can see a slim light blue line which doesn't belong there. Finally (and strangely enough), look at the base of the fin (where orange meets white) and where the gate meets the aircraft, I see some slight jaggies.

Sorry for that, but I think it is better for you to get the details so that you can work on these on your next pic!



Just sit back, relax and have a glass of Merlot...enjoy your life!
User currently offlineANITIX87 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 3292 posts, RR: 13
Reply 8, posted (7 years 5 months 4 days ago) and read 3222 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Thanks for the advice guys. I will pull the picture and post another edit attempt later tonight. I have to run right now.

TIS



www.stellaryear.com: Canon EOS 50D, Canon EOS 5DMkII, Sigma 50mm 1.4, Canon 24-70 2.8L II, Canon 100mm 2.8L, Canon 100-4
User currently offlineANITIX87 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 3292 posts, RR: 13
Reply 9, posted (7 years 5 months 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 3187 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hey guys. I have pulled the EasyJet shot.

I have submitted another edit of it, plus another shot. There are things in each one I'm still worried about, but here they are.

This one is the one I asked about earlier. I re-cropped it to include the entire aircraft. Things that concern me are: centering, level, exposure.
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/HBJZHgva2.jpg

This is a new image. The things that worry me here are: centering, level, exposure. The taxyways and runways are GVA are naturally slanted, and I used the verticals in the buildings in the background to level this one. I'm just afraid it doesn't "look" level and that it may hurt me for that reason.
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/HBJZHgva1.jpg

Thanks for any advice you can give me.

TIS



www.stellaryear.com: Canon EOS 50D, Canon EOS 5DMkII, Sigma 50mm 1.4, Canon 24-70 2.8L II, Canon 100mm 2.8L, Canon 100-4
User currently offlineANITIX87 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 3292 posts, RR: 13
Reply 10, posted (7 years 5 months 2 days ago) and read 3147 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Sorry to seem picky. I normally don't bump threads (especially my own) but I would like to get some feedback so as not to further hurt my acceptance ratio and so that I don't submit shots that can be approved in ways I have not thought of.

Thanks a million!

TIS



www.stellaryear.com: Canon EOS 50D, Canon EOS 5DMkII, Sigma 50mm 1.4, Canon 24-70 2.8L II, Canon 100mm 2.8L, Canon 100-4
User currently offlineEadster From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2216 posts, RR: 14
Reply 11, posted (7 years 5 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 3143 times:

Quoting ANITIX87 (Reply 10):
hurt my acceptance ratio

Forget about acceptance ratios - thats not what photography is all about. Who cares if the ratio is great or not - doesn't make you a bad photographer does it? Of course not.

The aircraft at the gate, I don't know. Even though you have included everything there, its very lopsided. It's an un-easy crop to me.

The other looks ok. Maybe a little soft but seems ok at a quick glance.


User currently offlineGarri767 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (7 years 5 months 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 3140 times:

for the most recent two


1- i have to say your perspective killed you on this shot. it throws off the centering, so even if it is centered , it wont "Feel" centered.

2- looks pretty good , whites may be a tad blown but otherwise it has a nice chance.


User currently offlineANITIX87 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 3292 posts, RR: 13
Reply 13, posted (7 years 5 months 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 3137 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Thanks, guys. Consensus seems to be that the first one will die the centering death, so I'll pull it.

Garri, do you think the overblown whites are a major enough problem to warrant a re-edit? Some more Shadow/Highlight? Also, is the shot level? The taxyway seems to give a different horizontal than the buildings do, but it might just be my eye. What do you recommend?

TIS



www.stellaryear.com: Canon EOS 50D, Canon EOS 5DMkII, Sigma 50mm 1.4, Canon 24-70 2.8L II, Canon 100mm 2.8L, Canon 100-4
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Pre-screening Advice posted Sun Oct 15 2006 00:04:45 by Avro85
Pre-screening Advice posted Mon Oct 2 2006 12:12:37 by GBOAB
Pre-screening Advice Requested posted Thu Sep 21 2006 21:31:59 by Glidepath
Pre Screening Advice posted Thu Aug 24 2006 02:05:07 by Lanpie
Pre-screening Advice posted Thu Aug 3 2006 16:57:37 by Lumix
Pre-Screening Advice - Salvagable Or Not? posted Wed Jul 26 2006 14:28:00 by Holl3411
Pre-screening Advice & A Big Thank You! posted Wed Jul 26 2006 14:07:04 by Lumix
Pre Screening Advice posted Tue Jul 25 2006 14:18:10 by Avro85
Pre-screening Advice Please posted Sat May 20 2006 14:40:10 by MarkusB
Pre-Screening Advice posted Sun Apr 9 2006 19:05:18 by Bottie