JetCrazy From Germany, joined Jun 2005, 68 posts, RR: 1 Posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1719 times:
Hi !
when I had the 30D for some weeks I noticed much more noise (ISO 200) at a perfect blue sky, than the 350D and the 400D.
Is there anybody who made the same conclusion ?
JeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 56 Reply 2, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1679 times:
Maiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 54 Reply 3, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1665 times:
My first 30D had unacceptable noise even at low ISO settings. The 2nd one has been just awesome.
JetJock22 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 5, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 1604 times:
I had quite a bit of noise on my 300D at 200 iso the other day and I was shooting against a bright blue sky and then into the sunset, so I was kinda confused as well.
Maiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 54 Reply 6, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 1587 times:
My 300D had less noise at ISO 400 than my first 30D did at ISO 200. Like I said, my second copy is working out great.
JetCrazy From Germany, joined Jun 2005, 68 posts, RR: 1 Reply 11, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 1552 times:
Quoting LGW (Reply 10): None of the firmware updates which Canon have released have addressed the problem of high ISO noise.
...do you think the 30D really has a high noise problem ? I never heard user in special forums talking about high noise when using a 30D. My 30D I used to have, had some noise at dark blue sky...I´m not really sure, but I think my former 350D hadn´t...Maybe my 30D was not OK....like the 400D I just gave back yesterday: It produced very soft pictures without any details...reason unknown.
Maiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 54 Reply 14, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 19 hours ago) and read 1518 times:
Quoting JetCrazy (Reply 11): like the 400D I just gave back yesterday: It produced very soft pictures without any details...reason unknown.
Maiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 54 Reply 16, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 1496 times:
Ben,
Im really surprised the place you bought it from didn't take the camera back for exchange. I had mine for about a month, made a call and told them I wasn't happy with the high noise levels (They knew about the issues on some of the cameras) and exchanged it, no questions asked. It was 2 weeks after the return period expired.
Im really surprised the place you bought it from didn't take the camera back for exchange. I had mine for about a month, made a call and told them I wasn't happy with the high noise levels (They knew about the issues on some of the cameras) and exchanged it, no questions asked. It was 2 weeks after the return period expired.
Yes I am surprised too, problem was they immediately shifted the problem to Canon who, surprise surprise said there wasn't a problem (like I expected anything else from them)
Maiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 54 Reply 19, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 4 hours ago) and read 1453 times:
Like I said, my new copy has been great, much better than the first one which had issues with grain even at lower ISO settings. Thats about all I can say on the subject.
Sponsor Message: 
From Germany, joined Jun 2005, 68 posts, 
From Canada, joined Jan 2005, 912 posts, 
From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, 
From , joined Dec 1969, posts, 
Printer friendly format 
