Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
This Tail-shot - Still Acceptable Motive?  
User currently offlineWalter2222 From Belgium, joined Sep 2005, 1292 posts, RR: 28
Posted (7 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 3540 times:

Dear All,

Would this (double) tail-shot still be an acceptable motive? Any suggestions to improve, if not OK?

http://walter2219.fotopic.net/p35935398.html

Thanks and regards,

Walter


canon 340d ;-) - EFS10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM - EFS18-55mm - EF28-105mm f3.5/4.5 - EF100-400mm f4.5-5.6l is usm - ...
5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAcontador From Chile, joined Jul 2005, 1421 posts, RR: 30
Reply 1, posted (7 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 3516 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Hi Walter,

Well, I would guess yes, but why don't you include the whole aircraft? For me at least it would be much more interesting then just the tail  Wink



Just sit back, relax and have a glass of Merlot...enjoy your life!
User currently offlineEadster From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2216 posts, RR: 14
Reply 2, posted (7 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 3490 times:

I don't know about that one. Tails are hard to get an acceptance any time, but yours to me is uneasy. The whole aircraft would have been better. Nothing interesting about the markings or the tail in that one.

Quoting Acontador (Reply 1):
For me at least it would be much more interesting then just the tail

Yep me too!


User currently offlineWalter2222 From Belgium, joined Sep 2005, 1292 posts, RR: 28
Reply 3, posted (7 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 3475 times:

Thanks for the feedback, Andres & Martin!

I have got several from the whole aircraft (from the same date/location), but I still have to choose which one is the best (to avoid doubles). I thought the tail-shot would be interesting, since the V-tail is not so common...

best regards,

Walter



canon 340d ;-) - EFS10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM - EFS18-55mm - EF28-105mm f3.5/4.5 - EF100-400mm f4.5-5.6l is usm - ...
User currently offlineLOCsta From United States of America, joined Sep 2006, 306 posts, RR: 8
Reply 4, posted (7 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 3470 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

It would have been a bit nicer if you had angled it to include the entire second A/C. That would have filled in the blanks.


Missed 4 chasing 1
User currently offlineWalter2222 From Belgium, joined Sep 2005, 1292 posts, RR: 28
Reply 5, posted (7 years 8 months 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 3415 times:

Hi Kevin,

Good comment about the blanks, I will check if I can find a better one (...and trying to avoid "NOA-double" rejection, because I have already one accepted from the same day...).

In the mean time, this one has been rejected for "soft", I assume it cannot be saved for here...  Sad

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...W_6912_RT8_WVB_1200px_extraUSM.jpg

... although comments to improve are always welcomed!

Best regards,

Walter



canon 340d ;-) - EFS10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM - EFS18-55mm - EF28-105mm f3.5/4.5 - EF100-400mm f4.5-5.6l is usm - ...
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Is This Terminal Shot An Acceptable Motive? posted Fri Sep 22 2006 19:32:32 by SmAlbany
Would This Photo Be Acceptable - 'motive'? posted Tue Nov 14 2006 01:41:04 by Chukcha
Would This Be An Acceptable Motive? posted Thu May 25 2006 16:28:47 by Walter2222
How About This Evening Shot? posted Fri Nov 3 2006 00:21:52 by San747
You Vote, Should I Appeal This Night Shot? posted Sat Oct 28 2006 18:49:20 by Atomother
Motiv For Tail Shot posted Sat Oct 7 2006 06:47:15 by Draigonair
'By The Tail Into The Hangar'. Motive? posted Wed Sep 27 2006 02:11:09 by Chukcha
What About This Kamikaze Shot? posted Mon Sep 25 2006 07:19:53 by AirMalta
Help With This Panning Shot posted Sat Sep 23 2006 01:59:01 by Flamedude707
MiG-23 Wreck - Acceptable Motive? posted Fri Sep 22 2006 01:55:25 by Ptrjong