Dazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2955 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 1 day ago) and read 4949 times:
I love your first photo. The colours are strong with a lovely blue sky. The tail of the aircraft is a little soft and I fear the original may have been slightly bury as well so you've had to sharpen it heavily?
The second photo is very soft / blurry. Not much you can do with that.
Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
JoeIro From Malta, joined Oct 2006, 4 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 1 day ago) and read 4926 times:
Quoting JRadier (Reply 1): there is a personal message from the screener in your rejection e-mail (or should be)
Yes I found the personal message from the screener. Thanks.
I still believe these photos deserve better.
I submitted these photos one in the 1600 resolution and the other in the 1300 resoultion. From the previous threads I have read I am aware these resolutions expose more the defects - however I did this to avoid the jaggies I was getting during resizing to 1024.
In fact these have no resizing but cropping and sharpening only.
I am new to photoshop CS2. I edited the photos and the above are the results I got.
Linco22 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 1381 posts, RR: 15
Reply 4, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 4900 times:
Joe the first is soft in parts, such as the tail and the wing tip of the right wing. Its a touch backlit, or at least the sun is shining towards the face of the aircraft, but I don't see that as a major problem here.