PreScreening — Aviation Photography Forum

Sponsor Message:


My Starred Topics \| Profile \| New Topic \| Forum Index \| Help \| Search

PreScreening

Bottie From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (6 years 7 months 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 848 times:

Hello,

I've been playing lately with my new hardware (monitors, calibrator) and now I've uploaded the first picture with the new setup. It is possible to have some feedback (good and bad Wink )about this picture:

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b.../ready/B-HME-EBBR-150505redone.jpg

What I noticed, when the picture is uploaded, it looks softer then the original jpg-file on my computer, is that possible?

Thanks in advance

6 replies: All unread, jump to last

Linco22 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (6 years 7 months 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 843 times:

Bottie,

It does appear slightly soft, and I think you've tried to compensate by sharpening a fair but. I love the motive and the light is very nice but I think its soft and because of that sharpening, it seems grainy on the shadows...

Hope this helps!

Regards
Colin Smile

Oly720man From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (6 years 7 months 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 843 times:

No expert, but I'd say that the blown highlights in the pylon will kill it.

I do like the close-ups like this though. Incidentally, is it a loose cover on the outboard engine core, just before the exhaust cone, or a blow-off of some sort?

FlyingZacko From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (6 years 7 months 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 820 times:

Quoting Linco22 (Reply 1):
It does appear slightly soft,

I think the engines are rather sharp compared to the fuselage. The fuselage's lack in sharpness however is probably due to the DOF.

Cheers,
Sebastian

Diezel From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (6 years 7 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 792 times:

Allthough I do not like the crop that much, I think the quality of the picture is excellent. On my LCD monitor, sharpness is just fine and lots of details are visible.

Personally I would add a little more local sharpness to the focus points of the fuselage, like the cockpit windows and the nose. The blown out highlights don't bother me at all and even add to the picture.

The lower part of the sky is a bit noisy, but this is something that can be solved quite easily by a tool like Neatimage (yes, a tool which CAN be usefull when used wisely Wink

).

Roel.

Eadster From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (6 years 7 months 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 768 times:

To be honest, to me it looks like its ever so slightly blurry. A slight amount of hand shake.

Great close shot though! Good capture.

Bottie From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (6 years 6 months 4 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 719 times:

Sorry for the late reply (hard times @ work) Wink

, just want to say thanks for the feedback Smile

And yes, it was accepted Smile

Top Of Page

Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics: