Maiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 52 Reply 2, posted (6 years 6 months 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 2520 times:
When editing a rejection its best to start from scratch rather than use the exact shot that was rejected... or at least cut off the original copyright bar.
D L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 10561 posts, RR: 53 Reply 3, posted (6 years 6 months 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 2479 times:
oh man. I feel stoopid!!! I edited the original upload because I felt the change was very minor. (If you can spot the difference, I'll give you 10 points. )
2 dumb rejections in one day. The other one was for category. :-/
Rotate From Switzerland, joined Feb 2003, 1479 posts, RR: 18 Reply 5, posted (6 years 6 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 2421 times:
Other question: Is this spot , where the shot was taken from, accessibel for public? which rwy is that where this guy lines up?
Really like the motive with that backdrop ...
D L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 10561 posts, RR: 53 Reply 6, posted (6 years 6 months 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 2399 times:
Quoting Rotate (Reply 5): Is this spot , where the shot was taken from, accessibel for public?
This spot is accessible to the public, but it's rarely this good. This plane had just landed on Runway 33. I've only seen jets land on this runway a handful of times in my life, and usually only when there's a separation problem with landing on Runway 1. This day, there was a severe crosswind, so nearly all the jets were landing on the cross runway. This day also made Gravelly Point shooting worthless.
Sponsor Message: 
From United States of America, joined May 1999, 10561 posts, 
From Luxembourg, joined Apr 2004, 236 posts, 
)
From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 6190 posts, 
From Switzerland, joined Feb 2003, 1479 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
