Maiznblu_757 From United States, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 59 Reply 2, posted (3 years 3 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 601 times:
When editing a rejection its best to start from scratch rather than use the exact shot that was rejected... or at least cut off the original copyright bar.
D L X From United States, joined May 1999, 7820 posts, RR: 55 Reply 3, posted (3 years 3 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 560 times:
oh man. I feel stoopid!!! I edited the original upload because I felt the change was very minor. (If you can spot the difference, I'll give you 10 points. )
2 dumb rejections in one day. The other one was for category. :-/
Rotate From Switzerland, joined Feb 2003, 1379 posts, RR: 26 Reply 5, posted (3 years 3 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 502 times:
Other question: Is this spot , where the shot was taken from, accessibel for public? which rwy is that where this guy lines up?
Really like the motive with that backdrop ...
D L X From United States, joined May 1999, 7820 posts, RR: 55 Reply 6, posted (3 years 3 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 480 times:
Quoting Rotate (Reply 5): Is this spot , where the shot was taken from, accessibel for public?
This spot is accessible to the public, but it's rarely this good. This plane had just landed on Runway 33. I've only seen jets land on this runway a handful of times in my life, and usually only when there's a separation problem with landing on Runway 1. This day, there was a severe crosswind, so nearly all the jets were landing on the cross runway. This day also made Gravelly Point shooting worthless.