Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Upload Queue Limits Change For New Photographers  
User currently offlineAdministrator From Sweden, joined May 1999, 3251 posts.
Posted (8 years 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 6993 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
SITE ADMIN

Hi all,

As you know the upload queue limits are dependent on two things; the acceptance ratio among the last 50 uploads and the number of photos you have accepted in the database. Up until now, if you had not uploaded at least 50 photos, your queue limit was stuck on 2. This has now been changed to make it easier for new photographers to increase their limits. With a limit of two, it could take months before you got passed that magic number 50 and got your limits increased even if you have had no rejections.

I have been unable to test that the change really works and I would appreciate if those of you with less than 50 shots screened can confirm that it seems to work. Your queue limit should now be dependant on how many accepted photos you have among your up to 50 most recent uploads. So if you have had 10 photos screened and 50% accepted, your queue limit should be 10 (as described at http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/queuehelp.inc).

The screeners have also been given a new checkbox marked "Screen pre-1990 photos" which will give them the option to screen such shots quickly as they are few and rare.

Regards,
Johan


Working on the site from morning 'till night that's livin' alright (1997-2007)
30 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineCalgaryBill From Canada, joined May 2006, 686 posts, RR: 5
Reply 1, posted (8 years 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 6929 times:

Hello Johan:

Thanks for thinking of us newbies! I just checked and, if I'm reading this correctly, my 57% acceptance ratio should allow me to upload 10, but I'm still restricted to 2.

B

Quote:
Accepted: 4 Rejected: 3
Acceptance Ratio: 57.1% Photos in DB: 4 In upload queue: 0
Photos allowed in upload queue: 2 Photo uploads available: 2 Why?


User currently offlineAdministrator From Sweden, joined May 1999, 3251 posts.
Reply 2, posted (8 years 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 6884 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
SITE ADMIN

Fixed that, please try again.

Thanks,
Johan



Working on the site from morning 'till night that's livin' alright (1997-2007)
User currently offlineCalgaryBill From Canada, joined May 2006, 686 posts, RR: 5
Reply 3, posted (8 years 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 6845 times:

Fixed! Thank you so much Johan, much appreciated.

I guess the least I can do in return is get off my butt and submit a bunch of photo's from the thousands I've been to lazy to upload!

B

Quote:

Accepted: 4 Rejected: 3
Acceptance Ratio: 57.1% Photos in DB: 4 In upload queue: 0
Photos allowed in upload queue: 10 Photo uploads available: 10 Why?


User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 11500 posts, RR: 52
Reply 4, posted (8 years 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 6832 times:

Quoting CalgaryBill (Reply 1):
Accepted: 4 Rejected: 3

That's a pretty good ratio for a newbie! Keep it up!

Hey Johan, how about some help for those of us who are not under 50 new, but still new?



Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
User currently offlineCalgaryBill From Canada, joined May 2006, 686 posts, RR: 5
Reply 5, posted (8 years 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 6815 times:

Quoting D L X (Reply 4):
That's a pretty good ratio for a newbie! Keep it up!

Thank you DLX. It was 4:1 until I got cocky on my last two. But the accepted pic's are just average side shots, I haven't had the nerve to try uploading much funky/artsy stuff yet. I'm pretty humbled by the work I see from many of you here.

B


User currently offlineAlibo5NGN From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 773 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (8 years 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 6794 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hi Johan,

It is nice to see the constant improvements and the evolution of A.net as it continues to maintain it's status as the leading aviation site in the world. I must appologize for being slow to understand the new change you have made for new photographers.

I joined in May 2006, failed to read the upload instructions, focused on difficult shots and destroyed my acceptance ratio by appealing over 15 rejected photos. Since learning my lesson the hard way, it has been a difficult challenge with the 2 upload limit to climb up to the 30%+ acceptance ratio so as to be able to upload more of my large collection of recent photos.

I just reach the 50 upload level a couple of days ago thanks in part to my appeals all of which were not successful. I just check my upload page and saw no change.

"Based on your 50 most recently screened photos: Accepted: 12 Rejected: 38
Acceptance Ratio: 24% Photos in DB: 12 In upload queue: 2
Photos allowed in upload queue: 2 Photo uploads available: 0 Why?"

How does this new rule affect me and those in my situation?

Happy thanksgiving and warm regards

Ken.



It takes knowledge to make a career. It takes wisdom to live a life.
User currently offline777MechSys From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 350 posts, RR: 3
Reply 7, posted (8 years 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 6791 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Good news. Too bad I hit my first 50 uploads last week and now have plenty of upload slots. D'oh. O'well such is life.

-Erick


User currently offlinePrat From Canada, joined Jun 2005, 229 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (8 years 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 6778 times:

Well I plugged it out with the 2-queue and am about two weeks shy of the 50 uploads. But I appreciate the change regardless and believe an acceptance ratio based system is definately the way to go.

Thanks Johan for all your hard work. Best site goin on the net!  checkmark 


User currently offlineIrish251 From Ireland, joined Nov 2004, 980 posts, RR: 4
Reply 9, posted (8 years 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 6739 times:

Quoting Administrator (Thread starter):
The screeners have also been given a new checkbox marked "Screen pre-1990 photos" which will give them the option to screen such shots quickly as they are few and rare

Good news - that provides an incentive to us oldies to keep digging out and scanning our old pics. It was the ability to view such a variety of old photos that attracted me to the site in the first place; in due course I began to upload my own scanned slides and am still doing so on a gradual basis.

Fergal


User currently offlineGhostbase From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 354 posts, RR: 3
Reply 10, posted (8 years 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 6672 times:

Quoting Irish251 (Reply 9):
Good news - that provides an incentive to us oldies to keep digging out and scanning our old pics. It was the ability to view such a variety of old photos that attracted me to the site in the first place; in due course I began to upload my own scanned slides and am still doing so on a gradual basis.

It certainly is good news and it is interesting to finally have a stated timeline for what is an 'old' photo. I have quite a few pre-1990 scans here and have a few more to process however, thanks to my poor negative/slide storage habits, each one can take many hours of remedial work to achieve an A.Net standard. This certainly gives more incentive to put in the time, especially with winter almost upon us!

The new upload queue limits for new photographers is also excellent news. I firmly believe that the future of this website/database lies with the current 1000 'new' photographers who contribute their first photos and many of who become motivated to share more and experiment more.

 ghost 



"I chase my dreams but I never seem to arrive"
User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 11500 posts, RR: 52
Reply 11, posted (8 years 6 days ago) and read 6630 times:

So, if the person gets their very first shot accepted, their ratio is 100%. Does that mean they now have a 25 photo queue limit?


Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
User currently offlineDbudd From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 228 posts, RR: 21
Reply 12, posted (8 years 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 6594 times:

I too struggled for months in a queue of only two!!

I managed an acceptance rate of nearly 50% but lately it has fallen to 44% and I only am allowed five in the queue at the moment. I was just talking about this last week with a friend about how it would take forever at 2 and now that I'm over fifty accepted you up the queue for newbies to a limit higher than what I get now..

Kinda smarts!!

Dave


User currently offlineQ330 From Australia, joined Dec 2003, 1460 posts, RR: 21
Reply 13, posted (8 years 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 6473 times:

Quoting D L X (Reply 11):
So, if the person gets their very first shot accepted, their ratio is 100%. Does that mean they now have a 25 photo queue limit?



Quoting Dbudd (Reply 12):
and now that I'm over fifty accepted you up the queue for newbies to a limit higher than what I get now..

Maybe it would make more sense to have the new photographer queue limit dependent on the acceptance ratio, but with a certain limit to the number or queue slots (like 10 or something).

-Q



Long live the A330!
User currently offlineDC10Tim From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2005, 1406 posts, RR: 14
Reply 14, posted (8 years 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 6467 times:

Quoting Administrator (Thread starter):
Up until now, if you had not uploaded at least 50 photos, your queue limit was stuck on 2. This has now been changed to make it easier for new photographers to increase their limits. With a limit of two, it could take months before you got passed that magic number 50 and got your limits increased even if you have had no rejections.

The penny has finally dropped after 16 months.

Sorry for sounding critical, it's a good move, but lots of people were pointing out the problems at the time.

Tim.



Obviously missing something....
User currently offlineAdministrator From Sweden, joined May 1999, 3251 posts.
Reply 15, posted (8 years 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 6451 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
SITE ADMIN

Have to say I agree with you there Tim. This has been pointed out to me by users and crew members for some time, the move should have come earlier.

/ Johan



Working on the site from morning 'till night that's livin' alright (1997-2007)
User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 11500 posts, RR: 52
Reply 16, posted (8 years 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 6443 times:

Quoting Administrator (Reply 15):
This has been pointed out to me by users and crew members for some time, the move should have come earlier

Better late than never for sure though. Future users will definitely benefit.



Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
User currently offlineLOCsta From United States of America, joined Sep 2006, 306 posts, RR: 8
Reply 17, posted (8 years 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 6308 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

cheers for this change. I am one of the new ones that will benefit!


Missed 4 chasing 1
User currently offlineChukcha From Australia, joined Mar 2006, 1989 posts, RR: 7
Reply 18, posted (8 years 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 6289 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting D L X (Reply 11):
So, if the person gets their very first shot accepted, their ratio is 100%. Does that mean they now have a 25 photo queue limit?

So what? Let's say, this person decides to use the right to upload all 25 at once, and that will be the moment of truth. If the first acceptance was just a streak of luck, the high queue limit will be lost straight away. If the person gets half of them accepted, they'll end up with 12-13 pictures in the DB and the moderate queue limit of 5 or 10. If all the pics get accepted, this person must be a genius , and then his high queue limit will be well deserved. I believe it's fair.

At the same time, I feel sorry for the guys who had to start in the difficult times of 2 pics limit, had to struggle and got stuck with low acceptance rate. Maybe they could receive some sort of "amnesty" to be able to start from "clean slate"?

Great move, Johan. A.net will definifely benefit from getting more "fresh blood" infused ...

[Edited 2006-11-25 01:40:40]

User currently offlineAlibo5NGN From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 773 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (8 years 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 6267 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Chukcha (Reply 18):
Maybe they could receive some sort of "amnesty" to be able to start from "clean slate"?

 checkmark   checkmark   checkmark   checkmark 

You are indeed a Statesman, an Officer and a Gentleman!

Ken.  biggrin 



It takes knowledge to make a career. It takes wisdom to live a life.
User currently offlineNIKV69 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (8 years 5 days ago) and read 6231 times:

Quoting Dbudd (Reply 12):
I managed an acceptance rate of nearly 50% but lately it has fallen to 44% and I only am allowed five in the queue at the moment. I was just talking about this last week with a friend about how it would take forever at 2 and now that I'm over fifty accepted you up the queue for newbies to a limit higher than what I get now..

Kinda smarts!!

I hear ya Dave but something had to give to the newbies coming up now. 2 was a little harsh. Just keep cranking out those great pics from LAS! You will have an acceptance rate of 75% and get 25 uploads slots soon!  thumbsup 


User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 11500 posts, RR: 52
Reply 21, posted (8 years 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 6219 times:

Quoting Chukcha (Reply 18):
So what? Let's say, this person decides to use the right to upload all 25 at once, and that will be the moment of truth. If the first acceptance was just a streak of luck, the high queue limit will be lost straight away.

So what is that those of us who are not major contributors to the queue because we only have 5 or less slots in the queue are now behind the hundreds of those that got their first and only shot in. I'm not very concerned that 1 person will blow his load putitng in 25 crappy (or excellent) pics into the queue. I'm concerned that 300 new photographers will put 25 photos in the queue after their first acceptance. That's 7500 photos, and could easily dwarf the current queue.


I'd also add that having only 2 photos allowed in the queue is a bit harsh for everyone, not just newbies.

[Edited 2006-11-25 06:31:35]


Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
User currently offlineChukcha From Australia, joined Mar 2006, 1989 posts, RR: 7
Reply 22, posted (8 years 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 6202 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

2 D L X:

That's why I've made this suggestion about the 'clean slate' for those who have been affected by the 2-shot limit - so that your previous uploads don't count, and you too can start with this 'first shot'. Whether it's going to happen or not - it's another question.


User currently offlineAlibo5NGN From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 773 posts, RR: 1
Reply 23, posted (8 years 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 6157 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting NIKV69 (Reply 20):
2 was a little harsh



Quoting D L X (Reply 21):
I'd also add that having only 2 photos allowed in the queue is a bit harsh for everyone

The 2 shot limit is forcing folks like me to focus on uploading boring, mundane photos in an attempt to reach the 5 or more limit and to minimize further rejections. In the process, I have had to shelve (at least for now) interesting/exciting/creative/unique photos which usually lead to higher rejection rates. My first 11 accepted photos have averaged about 4100 unique views each. With my best shot at 8000.

My 12th accepted photo and a boring one has limped along with 81 views after been on the DB for 5 days. Yet to get the first 11 shots, I had to endure a 50% rejection rate. Yes I will overcome the 2 shot limit eventually, but at a high cost. Not everyone has the persistence, perseverance and the tenacity to endure rejections and the emotional toll of having photos rejected constantly.

I think the minimum limit should be 5. The rejections have helped me improve my shots and editing abilities. The problem is that at the time when a new member has greatly improved on his photography and is ready to contribute with better photos, he finds himself in the 2 limit trap with months of waiting ahead of him.



It takes knowledge to make a career. It takes wisdom to live a life.
User currently offlineAcontador From Chile, joined Jul 2005, 1421 posts, RR: 30
Reply 24, posted (8 years 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 6151 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Hi Johan,

Great move in the right direction, but why not make it simpler and easier to understand with

Quoting Alibo5NGN (Reply 23):
I think the minimum limit should be 5.

5 is enough for (us) newbies, I started with 5, then 2, so I had both experiences, and I have to say that it was OK with 5. You need to learn and focus on improving your skills both as a photographer and editor, thus a reasonable low upload limit achieves just that. Just my  twocents  ...



Just sit back, relax and have a glass of Merlot...enjoy your life!
25 D L X : Yeah, but for me the bigger issue is queue size for everyone. The worst thing that could happen would be a total inundation of the queue by people wh
26 Post contains images Chukcha : Yes, I've thought of that, too... If it does happen, we might see things changing again quickly . Maybe it would be safer going back to the way it ha
27 Chukcha : I've noticed that in the last few days the quantity of pictures in queue submitted daily went up by around 200 pics on average. I wonder, if it is the
28 Post contains images D L X : I'll be the first to admit when I'm wrong. I may have been wrong.
29 Chukcha : I'm not trying to prove that you are wrong. You'd had a perfectly valid point, and you brought it up. I'm just curious to see how it all will work ou
30 MIAMIx707 : Good idea. I'd personally do it from 1995 on down, since there were many rare aircraft/airline combinations and short-lived operators around those da
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Upload Queue Limits Reduced posted Thu Jul 20 2006 04:54:04 by Administrator
Help For New Photographers posted Tue May 10 2005 04:51:55 by WakeTurbulence
New Max Upload Queue Stats? posted Wed Jun 22 2005 00:41:13 by Aitek
An Idea For The Upload Queue? posted Fri Aug 13 2004 10:59:38 by Bruce
Request For New FTP Upload Facility posted Fri Jul 6 2001 16:28:34 by A380-200
Leave Or Remove From Upload Queue? posted Thu Sep 28 2006 12:07:49 by Raptors
The "Johan" Upload Queue posted Thu Jul 20 2006 14:11:04 by Spruit
My Upload Queue Photos posted Sun Jun 25 2006 20:45:57 by NicolasRubio
Motive For New Airline? posted Mon Apr 17 2006 18:20:41 by 747 4-ever
New Photographers (and Nearly New!) - FYI posted Sat Nov 26 2005 20:49:46 by Davidu