Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Rejection/Motiv Question  
User currently offlineVzlet From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 835 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 9 months 2 days ago) and read 3522 times:

Would this rejection be due to the integral airstair, or is the person the cause?

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...me=20061205_C40_010041adw19my6.jpg


"That's so stupid! If they're so secret, why are they out where everyone can see them?" - my kid
11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAvsfan From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 250 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (7 years 9 months 2 days ago) and read 3514 times:

Was this photo rejected for motive, or was there another reason for the rejection? IMHO I like the photo, but could have some work done on the quality. I see some 'jaggies' in the windows, the lettering above the windows, and the tail. Plus it seems that there is some grainyness on the entire photo.


"Oh I have slipped the surly bonds of Earth...Put out my hand and touched the face of God"
User currently offlineAero145 From Iceland, joined Jan 2005, 3071 posts, RR: 21
Reply 2, posted (7 years 9 months 2 days ago) and read 3510 times:

I think I saw somewhere that inbuilt stairs don't affect motiv, and those are even on the opposite side. Hope it gets it, somehow nice! But of course some things can be fixed, as Avsfan said.

Good luck.


User currently offlineDendrobatid From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 1668 posts, RR: 62
Reply 3, posted (7 years 9 months 2 days ago) and read 3508 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

Quoting Vzlet (Thread starter):
Would this rejection be due to the integral airstair, or is the person the cause?

A bit of both. Airstairs are not normally a problem but the fact that they obscure the engine intake is an issue. The person is more obtrusive and avoidable by waiting a few seconds.
The image is a little oversharp too with jaggies evident on the fin.

Mick Bajcar


User currently offlineGlobalpics From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 216 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (7 years 9 months 2 days ago) and read 3501 times:

Quoting Dendrobatid (Reply 3):
A bit of both. Airstairs are not normally a problem but the fact that they obscure the engine intake is an issue. The person is more obtrusive and avoidable by waiting a few seconds.

Exactly my thoughts, a simple bit of patience and thought would have gone a long way here  Smile


User currently offlineAvsfan From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 250 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (7 years 9 months 2 days ago) and read 3496 times:

Quoting Dendrobatid (Reply 3):
The person is more obtrusive and avoidable by waiting a few seconds.

True, but I feel that having the crew chief in the picture gives it a little bit of life. It shows that there action around the plane instead of it just sitting on the ramp all by itself. To me it would not be any different than someone posting a flight-deck photo with the pilots performing their duties or a stale cabin shot full of passengers just sitting in their seats.

My  twocents  worth.

Louis



"Oh I have slipped the surly bonds of Earth...Put out my hand and touched the face of God"
User currently offlineAero145 From Iceland, joined Jan 2005, 3071 posts, RR: 21
Reply 6, posted (7 years 9 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 3490 times:

Quoting Dendrobatid (Reply 3):
ut the fact that they obscure the engine intake is an issue.

 banghead 

Again, I don't observe the photos I comment on enough. Damn; me.


User currently offlineEadster From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2216 posts, RR: 14
Reply 7, posted (7 years 9 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 3490 times:

Quoting Avsfan (Reply 5):
True, but I feel that having the crew chief in the picture gives it a little bit of life.

It does yes, but spoils the shot in this instance. So do the stairs to be honest. Clean shots (and by that I mean clear of obstructions), are much nicer to look at I think.

Here the stairs aren't too intrusive but its still uneasy with the engine covered because of them. Looking at the shot, I'm saying to myself, "Get out of the way, dude!" to the guy in the shot! He just seems to be in the way!!


User currently offlineLanas From Argentina, joined Aug 2006, 978 posts, RR: 13
Reply 8, posted (7 years 9 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 3482 times:

Mike

I think the person is obstructive because he is like doing nothing, just walking. Other cases where ground operators are working on the nose gear or the engine, for example, can be more appealing or just give a better feel to the photo. I agree with Martin, It´s like a "get out of the way, dude!" impression on this one.
As for the stairs, I believe that the criteria states that built-in stairs can´t fall into the motive call, but this can be an exception. The airstairs take away part of the beauty of the shot, and also its motive. Such closeups usually focus on the fuselage and the engines, so having the latter blocked looks kind of funny.

Cheers!
Lanas.-



"Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens." J.R.R. Tolkien
User currently offlineVzlet From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 835 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (7 years 9 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 3475 times:

Quoting Avsfan (Reply 1):
rejected for motive, or was there another reason for the rejection?

I need to apologize for my own lack of observance; I took another look at the email and "people" is indeed listed as a second reason. I can't see that this is "people" in the normal sense that someone is recognisable, but the screener clearly felt the guy in the way detracted from the shot.

Although I had the answer to my question and didn't know it, I thank each of you for your responses and insights.

-Mark



"That's so stupid! If they're so secret, why are they out where everyone can see them?" - my kid
User currently offlineAvsfan From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 250 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (7 years 9 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 3456 times:

Quoting Lanas (Reply 8):
I think the person is obstructive because he is like doing nothing, just walking.

The guy walking around the plane is most likely the crew-chief and he is probably peforming what is called a 'walk around'. In other words, he is ensuring that the plane is ready to go prior to flight.

Quoting Lanas (Reply 8):
Other cases where ground operators are working on the nose gear or the engine, for example, can be more appealing or just give a better feel to the photo.

IMHO and experience, there is no difference between a military crew-chief doing a 'walk around' and airline personnel loading bags onto a plane or getting an airliner ready for a flight.

Quoting Lanas (Reply 8):
I agree with Martin, It´s like a "get out of the way, dude!" impression on this one.

Sorry, but bad way to put this. I know that the crew chief would be honored to have his plane photographed (provided it was done legally) and know that the photo could be published on a site like this.

Mike...just curious how you were able to get a photo like this? I know that photographing aircraft while they sit the ramp of a US military installations is illegal...unless you were given permission by the base public affairs office.



"Oh I have slipped the surly bonds of Earth...Put out my hand and touched the face of God"
User currently offlineVzlet From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 835 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (7 years 9 months 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 3424 times:

Quoting Avsfan (Reply 10):
just curious how you were able to get a photo like this? I know that photographing aircraft while they sit the ramp of a US military installations is illegal...unless you were given permission by the base public affairs office.

It was during the DoD Open House at ADW.



"That's so stupid! If they're so secret, why are they out where everyone can see them?" - my kid
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Motiv Question posted Sun May 21 2006 15:12:57 by TransIsland
Motiv Question... posted Wed May 3 2006 12:23:49 by Eadster
Yet Another Rejection -badcameraangle Question posted Sun May 8 2005 09:01:03 by StealthZ
Rejection/appeal Question.... posted Sun Apr 27 2003 02:09:34 by Tappan
Fixed Level Portion, Questioning Motiv Rejection posted Sat Nov 18 2006 01:37:33 by Maiznblu_757
Motiv/size/editing Rejection posted Thu Nov 2 2006 15:38:14 by AirKas1
A Little Surprising Motiv Rejection posted Fri Oct 6 2006 13:44:28 by Aero145
Motiv Rejection. But Why? posted Tue Oct 3 2006 20:44:41 by Spencer
Motiv Rejection Help posted Wed Sep 27 2006 12:00:48 by Raptors
Flabbergasted About A Motiv Rejection! posted Mon Sep 25 2006 18:23:22 by Avro85