Ferrypilot From New Zealand, joined Sep 2006, 897 posts, RR: 3 Reply 3, posted (7 years 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 3088 times:
I've got a Canon EF200mm f/2.8L USM and a EF135mm f/2L USM. ...If I buy a 400D and use those lenses with it, ...could the combination produce photo's of this standard ??????
I have never used a digital camera and I have no idea what to expect from them!
Ferrypilot From New Zealand, joined Sep 2006, 897 posts, RR: 3 Reply 5, posted (7 years 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 3061 times:
Well I am tempted to think that photo has been taken with a very expensive high end camera and equally expensive image stabilised lense. And really I am more interested to know what standard a camera(like 400d) that I can afford will produce.
Walter2222 From Belgium, joined Sep 2005, 1291 posts, RR: 30 Reply 7, posted (7 years 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 3040 times:
Quoting Ferrypilot (Reply 5): And really I am more interested to know what standard a camera(like 400d) that I can afford will produce.
Quoting Ferrypilot (Reply 3): I've got a Canon EF200mm f/2.8L USM and a EF135mm f/2L USM
If you can get close enough, those lenses in combination with a 400D can certainly give you good results! I use a (very) low end 300D (only 6Mpx) and it is not the camera that is the limiting factor (it is me ...)
But remember, with a digital camera, you also have to invest in some kind of editing software (processing on a PC is much better than in-camera processing) and the time required to get acquainted with the software...
OD720 From Lebanon, joined Feb 2003, 1923 posts, RR: 34 Reply 10, posted (7 years 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 2906 times:
In another photo, the photographer mentions using a 20D with 300/ F4 L IS lense.
I believe that cameras like the 400D, 350D, 300D, 10D, D60 and D30, or their Nikon or other brand equivalants can produce such images. No need to mention the pro bodies here.