What Category Does This Fit Into? — Aviation Photography Forum

Sponsor Message:


My Starred Topics \| Profile \| New Topic \| Forum Index \| Help \| Search

What Category Does This Fit Into?

San747 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 4897 posts, RR: 14
Posted (5 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 900 times:

I caught N736SA back on Monday, and caught it with an interesting right engine nacelle:

If I upload it, what category should I put it under? Special? Hybrid?

Thanks for your help,
san747 wave

Scotty doesn't know...

8 replies: All unread, jump to last

QantasA332 From Australia, joined Dec 2003, 1500 posts, RR: 41
Reply 1, posted (5 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 892 times:

There are always aircraft flying around with mis-matched engine nacelles, nose-cones, and the like... not significant enough to warrant any c/s category other than "normal."

Cheers,
Gabriel

JeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 55
Reply 2, posted (5 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 887 times:

Quoting San747 (Thread starter):
what category should I put it under? Special? Hybrid?

Normal. That is not a permanent or purposeful change in the paint scheme. That was just a maintenance necessity. Doubt it would qualify for any special category.

San747 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 4897 posts, RR: 14
Reply 3, posted (5 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 881 times:

Quoting JeffM (Reply 2):
Normal. That is not a permanent or purposeful change in the paint scheme. That was just a maintenance necessity. Doubt it would qualify for any special category.

Quoting QantasA332 (Reply 1):
not significant enough to warrant any c/s category other than "normal."

OK. Looks like I'll upload it under "normal." Thanks for the assistance!

Scotty doesn't know...

Eadster From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2212 posts, RR: 18
Reply 4, posted (5 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 878 times:

Just beware of the part of the horizontal stabilizer cut off there. Hope it doesn't bring around the motive reject wagon!!

QantasA332 From Australia, joined Dec 2003, 1500 posts, RR: 41
Reply 5, posted (5 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 869 times:

Now that you mention it Eadster, yes, the centering probably won't work for A.net. Try moving the aircraft left in the frame. It's usually okay to cut off the horizontal stabiliser as long as it's clear that you're deliberately cropping to the vertical stab.

Cheers,
Gabriel

San747 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 4897 posts, RR: 14
Reply 6, posted (5 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 861 times:

Quoting QantasA332 (Reply 5):
Try moving the aircraft left in the frame. It's usually okay to cut off the horizontal stabiliser as long as it's clear that you're deliberately cropping to the vertical stab.

Is this a better crop?

Scotty doesn't know...

TZ From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2003, 1085 posts, RR: 57
Reply 7, posted (5 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 850 times:

Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Eadster (Reply 4):
Just beware of the part of the horizontal stabilizer cut off there. Hope it doesn't bring around the motive reject wagon!!

Sound advice.

Quoting San747 (Reply 6):
Is this a better crop?

Yes, looks much better.

TZ

TZ Aviation - Aeropuerto de los Banditos Team Images

San747 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 4897 posts, RR: 14
Reply 8, posted (5 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 815 times:

Quoting TZ (Reply 7):
Yes, looks much better.

OK, good. I'm especially glad to hear it from a screener. I'll upload once slots are available in my queue again in a few days...

Scotty doesn't know...

Top Of Page

Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics: