Mikephotos From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 2923 posts, RR: 56 Reply 2, posted (6 years 5 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 2964 times:
Quoting Graphic (Reply 1): The inconsistencies at this site are, at this point, laughable.
You're comparing apples to oranges. Sure, they're both fruit but one is totally different than the other.
And just to add: Yes, a nice selection of images for sure.
Clickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9444 posts, RR: 72 Reply 3, posted (6 years 5 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 2960 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW PHOTO SCREENER
All of those photos were added by Johan.
The shot by Luis is by far a better composed, interesting shot.
Is that really you Eric? I thought you self-deleted!
PictureThis From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2006, 196 posts, RR: 8 Reply 5, posted (6 years 5 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 2915 times:
Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 3): All of those photos were added by Johan.
Not that i'm being argumentative or anything, but if these photos are making people happy looking at them (like above), how come they are not added in the first place?
Cheers,
PictureThis
[Edited 2006-12-20 23:06:29]
Make sure they know we're playing the game, but we don't need to play the game because we've already won the game.
Mikephotos From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 2923 posts, RR: 56 Reply 8, posted (6 years 5 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 2876 times:
Quoting PictureThis (Reply 5): Not that i'm being argumentative or anything, but if these photos are making people happy looking at them (like above), how come they are not added in the first place?
Because they probably have/had questionable motive and/or quality issues that did not warrant a direct add. "Making people happy looking at them" while great, is not in itself a good enough reason for acceptance. I hope that answers your question without sounding defensive, not my intention.
My pleasure. Just wanted to share the exellent mood these pictures put me in. It didn't even get spoiled by the rejection (a fair one, I must admit) I myself received this morning.
Clickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9444 posts, RR: 72 Reply 12, posted (6 years 5 months 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 2853 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW PHOTO SCREENER
Who cares about the angle? What does that have to do with motive?
One looks like the back of an airplane, the other looks like a freaking work of art.
Why do you have to turn a positive thread into a negative? And, strictly on a personal note, if you don't like the policies why did you leave and comeback?
Chukcha From Australia, joined Mar 2006, 1935 posts, RR: 8 Reply 16, posted (6 years 5 months 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 2790 times:
Quoting Graphic (Reply 15):
You mean the one with correct white balance that got rejected?
Do you really think, white balance and art have much to do with each other ? About time for the museums to start rejecting pictures by Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, etc. In some of their works, WB really sucks.
Mirage From Portugal, joined May 1999, 3120 posts, RR: 16 Reply 20, posted (6 years 5 months 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 2756 times:
The 747 is reflecting on the car roof I put the camera on because I didn't had a tripod, as for the wb, Faro ramp lights have a slightly "yellowish" tone.
Eadster From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2214 posts, RR: 16 Reply 21, posted (6 years 5 months 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2728 times:
Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 12):
Why do you have to turn a positive thread into a negative?
You just did that all by yourself, and to this day, continue to do so. I have not seen you reply to a thread constructively, since I've been a member here.
Quoting JeffM (Reply 14): Looks odd to me, as does the wb.
WB does to my eyes too, but interesting concept with the roof. I like it!
Raptors From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 179 posts, RR: 0 Reply 22, posted (6 years 5 months 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 2599 times:
Hi,
Thanks for posting these shots, especially as the B747 flying over Mt. Fuji was taken by myself!
It is a shame that more of this type of shot probably gets rejected due motiv as I personally find them much more interesting to look at than simple side on shots, and, judging by the amount of hits they seem to get I would think the majority agree.
I am approaching 1000 shots (7 to go) but find I have to be more careful in what I choose to upload in order to avoid those dreaded rejections! I wish I could be a little more adventurous.
Merry Christmas to all who celebrate it and a Happy New Yeat to all.
If you fail to see the difference between the shot you had rejected (correctly!) and Luis' one, you really don't have a clue...
Jet Visuals
25 Eadster: Sorry but your instance was not an inconsistency. There is a big quality difference between the two...
26 Graphic: His shot wasn't rejected for quality issues
27 Flugnord: FACE!!!! But i'm happy now, I got one accepted today. And BTW, I LOVE the snow on the front page. [Edited 2006-12-22 01:04:56]
28 Chukcha: Looks nice, especially considering that we don't get any REAL snow down at our end . At least A.net will give us some . Just to conclude: from now on
29 Scottieprecord: I really don't understand how having a car hood take up such a great deal of the shot does not warrant a motive rejection... Luis. Sorry if that offen
30 Chukcha: Try and look deeper into the hood, maybe you'll understand. Anyway, its all right, some see, some don't... As for me, I don't understand you. He got
31 Mirage: Don't worry, doesn't offend me at all, I don't have problems with negative critics on my photos, they're welcome. Just try to see the reflex, not the
32 Scottieprecord: Yes, you're right... There's no reason not to be happy about other's acceptances. Anddd I am very jealous of Luis' work. Haha. He's a much better pho
Sponsor Message: 
From Australia, joined Mar 2006, 1935 posts, 
.
From , joined Dec 1969, posts, 
From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2006, 196 posts, 
From Chile, joined Jul 2005, 1392 posts, 
...
From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 3770 posts, 
From Portugal, joined May 1999, 3120 posts, 
From Iceland, joined Feb 2006, 94 posts, 
From Austria, joined Apr 2004, 3765 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
