Psyops From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 1, posted (6 years 4 months 3 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 2100 times:
N108RF needs some CCW rotation - good light and sharpness.
C-GYHD (full frame) needs some CCW as well.
C-GSHG seems a bit low in the frame (just a touch) and is slightly backlit. Good and sharp tho!
C-FPCI (front on) feels level, besides the telephone pole and fence posts (which don't seem to be pure vertical) looks good overall.
C-GYHD could use a bit of CCW, and then it might need to move up a touch in the frame once it is rotated. I like the clarity of this one, but I'd go with the full side-on for this aircraft.
C-FPCI close-up could use a bit of CW rotation and a touch higher in the frame - I like these close-ups! You pick one of the two though for upload, I'd go with this one.
Avsfan From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 250 posts, RR: 2 Reply 2, posted (6 years 4 months 3 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 2093 times:
Quoting Psyops (Reply 1): N108RF needs some CCW rotation
Quoting Psyops (Reply 1): C-GYHD (full frame) needs some CCW as well
Just curious to know what you are basing your recommendation for CCW rotation on? If it is the taxiway, then remember that not all taxiway/runways are level. After looking at the photos against a grid in PS Elements 5.0, the buildings behind the aircraft are pretty level.
"Oh I have slipped the surly bonds of Earth...Put out my hand and touched the face of God"
Psyops From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 3, posted (6 years 4 months 3 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 2089 times:
Quoting Avsfan (Reply 2): Just curious to know what you are basing your recommendation for CCW rotation on?
For N108RF based on the buildings - no grid, but zoom in a bit and drag the edges of the building horizonal edges to the edge of the frame. Second, it just doesn't "feel" level to me. I'm talking maybe 0.2 or 0.15 CCW.
For C-GYHD I was looking at the "average" leans on the poles in the background. Right now it feels like it leans to the left, so a bit of CCW.
I realize taxiways aren't always level, but in my opinion if it doesn't feel right, then it doesn't matter if you have accurately represented the slope of the taxiway.
BmiBaby737 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 1635 posts, RR: 10 Reply 4, posted (6 years 4 months 3 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 2079 times:
N108RF at first glance doesn't seem to need any rotation, but looking into it a bit more it could do with a tad bit of CCW...
C-GYHD again needs a tiny bit of CCW, would hurt to give it a kick of sharpness either...
C-GSHG looks to be in areas out of focus; she doesn't look to have the best of quality either...She's also too *high* in the frame, not too low as previously stated.
G-FPCI looks to be unlevel, but looking around at all the poles and telephone lines it looks to be the taxiway which is unlevel and so seems ok - hard one though! Not sure of it's chances for Airliners.net however...
739 Looks too low in the frame, again a kick of sharpening and she has a colour tint (in need of some blue)...otherwise a nice shot!
NacAir - depending on where you centre it from she looks to be ok, but from a personal point of how I would centre my images - she'd appear to be slightly low. I know people have personal preferences on centreing however. A kick of sharpen would'nt go a miss IMO.
Sponsor Message: 
From Canada, joined Jun 2005, 1323 posts, 
From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 250 posts, 
From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 1635 posts, 
From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2214 posts, 
From Netherlands, joined Sep 2004, 4597 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
