ANITIX87 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 3233 posts, RR: 14 Posted (6 years 4 months 4 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 2417 times:
Hey, guys!
Have taken a break from uploading. I took someone's advice and edited shots without uploading. I let them sit in my hard drive until today, when I went back and looked at my edits to see if I thought they were still worthy of uploads.
The first one I'm a little unsure as to the quality. I fear I may have used too much shadow/highlight, thanks to the sun glare along the fuselage.
This one I'm confident in for all aspect, but you never know nowadays.
Any constructive criticisms? Let me know, as I'm always here to learn!
TIS
www.stellaryear.com: Canon EOS 50D, Canon EOS 5DMkII, Sigma 50mm 1.4, Canon 24-70 2.8L II, Canon 100mm 2.8L, Canon 100-4
ANITIX87 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 3233 posts, RR: 14 Reply 3, posted (6 years 4 months 3 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 2350 times:
Thanks for the advice, guys.
I've re-done the Continental shot. Is this any better?
I'll do the other one tomorrow morning and post it.
TIS
www.stellaryear.com: Canon EOS 50D, Canon EOS 5DMkII, Sigma 50mm 1.4, Canon 24-70 2.8L II, Canon 100mm 2.8L, Canon 100-4
N243NW From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 1494 posts, RR: 21 Reply 4, posted (6 years 4 months 3 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 2344 times:
I'm not totally sure if this is enough to warrant a rejection, but the CO titles on the 767 appear a bit jagged to me. Anyone else feel the same way?
-N243NW
ANITIX87 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 3233 posts, RR: 14 Reply 6, posted (6 years 4 months 3 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 2304 times:
Ok 9V. Thanks so much for your advice. Are the colors any better here? If not, would you be willing to give them both a go if I send you the originals?
And how's this EasyJet one with a modified crop and some more Shadow/Highlight?
TIS
www.stellaryear.com: Canon EOS 50D, Canon EOS 5DMkII, Sigma 50mm 1.4, Canon 24-70 2.8L II, Canon 100mm 2.8L, Canon 100-4
9V From China, joined Aug 2008, 0 posts, RR: 0 Reply 9, posted (6 years 4 months 3 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 2274 times:
Antonis,
I've had a look at both the originals. As you say yourself the exposure was off. The whites of the fuselage is too bright on both photos so I don't think either are good enough to be accepted here. Nice try though, better luck next time.
ANITIX87 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 3233 posts, RR: 14 Reply 10, posted (6 years 4 months 3 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 2269 times:
Quoting 9V (Reply 9):
I've had a look at both the originals. As you say yourself the exposure was off. The whites of the fuselage is too bright on both photos so I don't think either are good enough to be accepted here. Nice try though, better luck next time.
Thanks again for your help, 9V. I hope to get out to EWR next week and I'll make sure my settings are correct, haha. Maybe I'll get some good ones.
TIS
www.stellaryear.com: Canon EOS 50D, Canon EOS 5DMkII, Sigma 50mm 1.4, Canon 24-70 2.8L II, Canon 100mm 2.8L, Canon 100-4
Sponsor Message: 
From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 3233 posts, 
From Poland, joined Sep 2002, 1854 posts, 
From China, joined Aug 2008, 0 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
