A380CGN From Germany, joined May 2006, 21 posts, RR: 0 Posted (8 years 3 months 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 4463 times:
I need your help with this picture which I got rejected for "quality", "not centered" and "soft appearance", but I absolutely do not agree with the screeners decision and the rejection-reasons . I have not tried to upload so many pictures to a.net so far because I know about the very high standards and with my previous camera I was not able to produce such very good pictures, but I recently bought a Canon EOS 30D and the quality of my shots has increased a lot so for a start I was trying to upload this picture of which I thought and still think that it is very good in quality. I think that the aircraft is centered in that shot and furthermore I don't see any soft appearance in that picture. So maybe you guys can help me. Do you agree with the screeners? Maybe you can tell me how I could improve this picture or if I should appeal it.
Nice shot! But, I agree with the screeners, especially for the rejection reasons of 'quality' and 'soft'. I do feel if you resized this image down to 1024, you would be easy to deal with sharpening to this image.
If you like, you could send me over the original shot and I'd like to try to edit it.
ThierryD From Luxembourg, joined Dec 2005, 2099 posts, RR: 51
Reply 3, posted (8 years 3 months 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 4445 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW HEAD SUPPORT
I'm a little surprised by this picky rejection for an aircraft which is new to the database but try the following and it should be ok:
- resizing to 1200x... will get rid of the quality as at 1600x... small flaws just show too much
- centered: proabably the crop was meant by this rejection reason; crop a little tighter on the tail and nose and maybe all so slightly higer in the frame
- a little more USM (UnSharpMask) should do the trick
A note to the screeners (at the very bottom of the 2nd upload page) telling them that this aircraft (reg/aircraft combination) is new to the database could have helped to apply less stringent acceptance criteria.
Acontador From Chile, joined Jul 2005, 1425 posts, RR: 29
Reply 4, posted (8 years 3 months 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 4443 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW PHOTO SCREENER
Well, first of all the camera does not make the photographer, it's the other way around!
Now, to your picture. Do not try to upload bigger than 1024 pixels wide unless you are absolutely sure that your picture is top quality! And yours is not.
If you look carefully to the rear and the bottom fuselage (lower engine nacelles), there you will find your soft areas. Additionally, the Germanwings title on the fin is soft/blurry. You can see that you sharpened selectively some areas (reg, fuselage title), but that does not get rid of the general softens. As for the center, that is probably the least of your problems! A bit harsh I would say...
I suspect everything will look much better at 1024, with the correct amount of sharpening. And do not resize this one, start with a new edit.
[Edited 2007-01-23 22:30:55]
Just sit back, relax and have a glass of Merlot...enjoy your life!
A380CGN From Germany, joined May 2006, 21 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (8 years 3 months 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 4398 times:
Hi again and thanks for your help!
I edited the original pic, resized it, corrected the frame a bit, used some more USM and manually sharpened some parts.
So what do you think about it now? 1200 pix wide or 1024 pix wide. Can I use one of them?
Quote: Well, first of all the camera does not make the photographer, it's the other way around!
Yes, I know and I didn't want to boast, it was just an explanation.