Viv From Ireland, joined May 2005, 3106 posts, RR: 31 Posted (6 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 2341 times:
My most recent upload was rejected for "Editing". I appealed and it was accepted. After a few days in the database and a few hundred hits, the shot has apparently been removed.
Why? I have emailed the screeners but got no reply.
Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
Clickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9444 posts, RR: 72 Reply 4, posted (6 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 2085 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW PHOTO SCREENER
Gary sent you the original email AND replied to your email yesterday, before you created this thread.
Clickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9444 posts, RR: 72 Reply 6, posted (6 years 3 months 1 week 23 hours ago) and read 1900 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW PHOTO SCREENER
then for some reason you are not getting emails from Gary, although I can verify that you were the recipent (the screeners were cc'd)
you might want to check with your email provider and/or ISP
Clickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9444 posts, RR: 72 Reply 8, posted (6 years 3 months 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 1887 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW PHOTO SCREENER
well, clearly not if you are not getting emails.
maybe try a gmail or yahoo account? not sure what 'pt.lu' is...
Viv From Ireland, joined May 2005, 3106 posts, RR: 31 Reply 9, posted (6 years 3 months 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 1881 times:
Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 8): clearly not if you are not getting emails
Clearly yes - I get emails from all over the world - including rejection or acceptance emails from Anet. Anet should look for the beam in its own eye before finding the mote in mine.
"pt.lu" is posts and telegraphs Luxembourg - the state-run ISP. Fully reliable.
Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
Clickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9444 posts, RR: 72 Reply 11, posted (6 years 3 months 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 1854 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW PHOTO SCREENER
well, Gary's email was recieved by everyone but you, so I do'nt know what to say.
I am not sure how we would fix that, but if you have ideas please send then to support@airliners.net
One suggestion: When a shot is appealed, the decision to accept it or not should be based only on the original reason for rejection, i.e. whether that reason was valid or not.
I'm done talking to you about this now . It's a waste of my time.
Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
Clickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9444 posts, RR: 72 Reply 13, posted (6 years 3 months 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 1842 times:
Beechcraft From Germany, joined Nov 2003, 828 posts, RR: 46 Reply 14, posted (6 years 3 months 1 week 21 hours ago) and read 1798 times:
Viv,
i honestly can´t see your problem. We have offered our help, emailed you twice and gave you information and advice in this thread. What else do you want?
Quoting Viv (Reply 12): I'm done talking to you about this now . It's a waste of my time.
I´m beginning to wonder whose time was wasted here....
Denis
That's it! You people have stood in my way long enough. I'm going to clown college!
I don't want to prolong the discussion and I really do appreciate the advice. But I am tired of being told that it is somehow my fault that I have not received the emails about this (which I haven't). The last email I got about this was that the shot had been accepted on appeal.
I have checked with my ISP - everything is ok at my end. Today I have received emails from Ireland, England, France, Ecuador and Luxembourg. My email is working.
[Edited 2007-02-14 17:42:45]
Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
CalgaryBill From Canada, joined May 2006, 686 posts, RR: 6 Reply 18, posted (6 years 3 months 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 1764 times:
Most ISP's have spam filters and arbitrarily block e-mails for any of a number of reasons: the e-mail didn't come from another ISP (ie: when someone sends from a domain name like @airliners.net but sends the e-mail through @myISP.net's server), if a certain number from the same domain hit the filter in a given period of time, the list goes on.
So @airliners.net might be in the ISP's spam list, or it might not but still be blocked. You might also have accidently blocked it in your own spam filter (I've done it!). Regardless the cause, making comments like "it's a waste of my time" is hardly fair given that the problem isn't diagnosed and the screeners have been trying to help. In all fairness, there are way fewer outgoing spam filters than incoming, so if e-mails were sent to you, they are much less likely to have been stopped at the source than at the receiving end.
Clickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9444 posts, RR: 72 Reply 19, posted (6 years 3 months 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 1746 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW PHOTO SCREENER
Viv - I sent you a test email - using the original subject title - about a hour ago.
DC10Tim From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2005, 1405 posts, RR: 16 Reply 20, posted (6 years 3 months 1 week 19 hours ago) and read 1737 times:
You should be able to put the "@airliners.net" domain name on a safe list so that everything sent from there automatically comes straight through. Anomalies like this do crop up from time to time. One forum member, and only that member couldn't receive emails from a hotmail account of mine a while back and his ISP were completely clueless to the problem. I switched email accounts and everything works fine now.
TransIsland From Bahamas, joined Mar 2004, 2031 posts, RR: 11 Reply 22, posted (6 years 3 months 1 week 1 hour ago) and read 1615 times:
Quoting CalgaryBill (Reply 18): Most ISP's have spam filters and arbitrarily block e-mails for any of a number of reasons: the e-mail didn't come from another ISP (ie: when someone sends from a domain name like @airliners.net but sends the e-mail through @myISP.net's server), if a certain number from the same domain hit the filter in a given period of time, the list goes on.
So @airliners.net might be in the ISP's spam list, or it might not but still be blocked. You might also have accidently blocked it in your own spam filter (I've done it!). Regardless the cause, making comments like "it's a waste of my time" is hardly fair given that the problem isn't diagnosed and the screeners have been trying to help. In all fairness, there are way fewer outgoing spam filters than incoming, so if e-mails were sent to you, they are much less likely to have been stopped at the source than at the receiving end.
Exactly!
And many ISP's do this without their customers knowledge... I'm dealing with two (mainly), and about every month they re-activate the spam filter for my account, which I then insist they turn off again, as I don't like them making decisions for me. One thing that gets stuck in that filter, for instance, is Amazon.com order confirmations (whereas shipping confirmations go through).
I'm an aviation expert. I have Sky Juice for breakfast.
CalgaryBill From Canada, joined May 2006, 686 posts, RR: 6 Reply 23, posted (6 years 3 months 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 1555 times:
Quoting TransIsland (Reply 22): And many ISP's do this without their customers knowledge...
Mine does it with our knowledge, but they don't bother looking to see if anything is in their filter. It takes on average 25 minutes to get through their phone system to talk to somebody, then they just deny anyone is on the blacklist instead of actually looking. Better yet, they blame the sending ISP for blocking stuff coming to me!
I've also tried resolving blocked addresses using their e-mail system but never received a response. Fortunately they haven't blocked anything from Airliners.net, but maybe as more and more people in Western Canada submit images and e-mail volume increases, it could become problematic with the way my ISP works.
Sponsor Message: 
From Ireland, joined May 2005, 3106 posts, 
From UK - England, joined Jan 2007, 820 posts, 
From Germany, joined Nov 2003, 828 posts, 
From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9444 posts, 
From Luxembourg, joined Dec 2005, 2021 posts, 
From Netherlands, joined Feb 2005, 77 posts, 
From Canada, joined May 2006, 686 posts, 
From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2005, 1405 posts, 
From Bahamas, joined Mar 2004, 2031 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
