JakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4741 posts, RR: 8 Posted (6 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 1925 times:
Hi,
Firstly, this is not a moan, just curiosity.
I recently uploaded a pic (the first I believe - the reg. wasn't in the database and neither was the airline) of a Plaza Air Services ATR-72, EC-KAD, which was promptly accepted. What I'm wondering is why it hasn't appeared in the news/what's new section on the front page? It may not be the world's most exciting colour scheme but it's a new reg. and a new airline, so surely it qualifies? As I say, it's no big deal for me but it would be nice to get a pic on the front page.
ThierryD From Luxembourg, joined Dec 2005, 2021 posts, RR: 52 Reply 1, posted (6 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1909 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW HEAD SUPPORT
Not a screener but I was in the similar situation 2 or 3 times. At the time one of the screeners told me that pictures are only added to the news section if judged important enough. Until now I haven't found out what would qualify as "important enough" though. It's a rather subjective decision.
JakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4741 posts, RR: 8 Reply 2, posted (6 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1905 times:
Thanks Thierry.
I would have thought a brand new airline would be pretty important, irrespective of its colour scheme. It's also a brand new registration - one of the first to have a 'K' suffix.
*UPDATE* I just found a pic added today of Plaza's new 727-200F, EC-JHC, which appears to be operated by Swiftair. Same colour scheme, except the ATR is pax. Again, not added to the news section.
BmiBaby737 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 1636 posts, RR: 10 Reply 3, posted (6 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1886 times:
Did you get in touch with anyone at Airliners.net crew to ask for it to be added to the news? Crew may not have relised it was a new airline/livery.
This acording to the websites guidelines is of banner quality.
This is however, in the incorrect forum acording to previous posts of such requests.
Clickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9444 posts, RR: 72 Reply 4, posted (6 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1793 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW PHOTO SCREENER
Usually new types, schemes, logojets etc do get a banner, I did one yesterday for the new Spanair logojet, post the pictures here and we will sort it out.
Silver1SWA From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 4538 posts, RR: 26 Reply 5, posted (6 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1763 times:
I wondered the same thing when I uploaded the first pics of Southwest's first 737-300 with winglets. I wasn't sure if it simply didn't qualify as newsworthy, or if I was supposed to communicate with the screeners at the time of upload/acceptance.
ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
Just for future reference, what is the procedure for examples such as these? I thought my comment indicated that this was a new aircraft/reg, along with the fact that it was tagged as a priority upload? Or do I need to put it as a message to the screeners when I get to the final upload screen?
Clickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9444 posts, RR: 72 Reply 7, posted (6 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 1742 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW PHOTO SCREENER
I see what happened (I was actually the screener who direct added the ATR shot). We do not do banners for hybrid liveriers, although they do get added on a priority basis if they are new.
However, it would appear that this is infact their livery (talk about eurowhite!) and therefore a banner has been added.