JakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7 Posted (8 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 3505 times:
Firstly, this is not a moan, just curiosity.
I recently uploaded a pic (the first I believe - the reg. wasn't in the database and neither was the airline) of a Plaza Air Services ATR-72, EC-KAD, which was promptly accepted. What I'm wondering is why it hasn't appeared in the news/what's new section on the front page? It may not be the world's most exciting colour scheme but it's a new reg. and a new airline, so surely it qualifies? As I say, it's no big deal for me but it would be nice to get a pic on the front page.
ThierryD From Luxembourg, joined Dec 2005, 2102 posts, RR: 51
Reply 1, posted (8 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 3489 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW HEAD SUPPORT
Not a screener but I was in the similar situation 2 or 3 times. At the time one of the screeners told me that pictures are only added to the news section if judged important enough. Until now I haven't found out what would qualify as "important enough" though. It's a rather subjective decision.
Silver1SWA From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 4937 posts, RR: 25
Reply 5, posted (8 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 3343 times:
I wondered the same thing when I uploaded the first pics of Southwest's first 737-300 with winglets. I wasn't sure if it simply didn't qualify as newsworthy, or if I was supposed to communicate with the screeners at the time of upload/acceptance.
ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
Just for future reference, what is the procedure for examples such as these? I thought my comment indicated that this was a new aircraft/reg, along with the fact that it was tagged as a priority upload? Or do I need to put it as a message to the screeners when I get to the final upload screen?