Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Advice On Whether To Attempt Upload  
User currently offlineMonteycarlos From Australia, joined Mar 2005, 2107 posts, RR: 28
Posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 4179 times:

Hi all,

These shots I took were all taken at dusk at Melbourne and I was considering uploading them. They are marginal shots at best, but I thought a fresh set of eyes might help. Honestly, to me they seem soft, and some of them have contrast issues but I thought I would check to see what everyone else thought...


MyAviation.net photo:
Click here for bigger photo!
Photo © Carl J Maroney
MyAviation.net photo:
Click here for bigger photo!
Photo © Carl J Maroney


MyAviation.net photo:
Click here for bigger photo!
Photo © Carl J Maroney


MyAviation.net photo:
Click here for bigger photo!
Photo © Carl J Maroney



This last one of the MH B744 I think also suffers from distance...

Thanks for the feedback... always appreciated.

Carl


It's a beautiful night to fly like a phoenix...
27 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineThierryD From Luxembourg, joined Dec 2005, 2070 posts, RR: 51
Reply 1, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 4158 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SUPPORT

I wouldn't call your photos marginal; they look pretty nice to me.
In detail:

- Singapore: the only one whose chances of making it in the db I doubt; it's backlit and might fall under a common/quality rejection as there are already around 50 pics of it in the db

- Emirates: superb background lighting; 2 main issues though: plane is dark and a little soft. With some shadow-highlight and USM you might be able to save it though

- VirginBlue: needs around 02°CW roation (I know it's peanuts but screeners have been pretty picky concerning levelling as of late) and some selective sharpening (nose and tail need some more but take care not to sharpen the area around the engine nacelles even more as there are already small jaggies)

- Malaysian: definitely not a distance problem as you include the whole wingspan and thus entirely fill the frame with the aircraft. The fuselage could use a little more sharpening though.

Good luck!

Thierry



"Go ahead...make my day"
User currently offlineLIPH From Italy, joined May 2004, 848 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 4149 times:

Montey,
all links to images are broken...

Ciao



Life sucks. Then you die. Live fast, die young.
User currently offlineAussie18 From Australia, joined Jun 2005, 1747 posts, RR: 9
Reply 3, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 4135 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Quoting LIPH (Reply 2):
Montey,
all links to images are broken...

Yeah the links are broken.


User currently offlineStealthZ From Australia, joined Feb 2005, 5696 posts, RR: 44
Reply 4, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 4133 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Don't think Carl can do much about it, seems myaviation.net is down!

FWIW, on first glance I thought the photos showed promis but will have to refrain from comment until I can examine them more closely.

Cheers



If your camera sends text messages, that could explain why your photos are rubbish!
User currently offlineLIPH From Italy, joined May 2004, 848 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 4128 times:

Montey,

- First shot seems to suffer from a quality/soft issue
- The Emirates one looks very promising. Probably a bit more sharpening in some areas would do better along with some CCW rotation. But I think you can save this nice shot.
- Virgin one looks ok to me.
- Malasyan one needs a bit of CW rotation and an extra kick of USM.

As always, jus my  twocents 
Good luck !

Ciao



Life sucks. Then you die. Live fast, die young.
User currently offlineMonteycarlos From Australia, joined Mar 2005, 2107 posts, RR: 28
Reply 6, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 4112 times:

Thanks for the comments thus far... Its a bit late at night here in MEL to start making any changes but I will do so tomorrow morning and try to repost them here for a look... Thanks for the advice thus far. I have a one more I wish to ask your advice on:


MyAviation.net photo:
Click here for bigger photo!
Photo © Carl J Maroney



Crop, tug, person and background clutter make it awkward plus being colourblind I am not too sure about the colour cast. Hence the suggestion that a fresh pair of eyes might help. Thanks for your advice all!  Wink



It's a beautiful night to fly like a phoenix...
User currently offlineDC10Tim From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2005, 1406 posts, RR: 14
Reply 7, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 4107 times:

Hi Carl,

The 727 shot looks good in the low sunlight, but I think the tug and ramp guy might mean a 'motive' rejection.

With respect to the other shots, I agree with Thierry, but I would just lower the Virgin 737 in the frame slightly as it looks a little high at the minute.

Regards,

Tim.



Obviously missing something....
User currently offlineLIPH From Italy, joined May 2004, 848 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 4090 times:

Quoting Monteycarlos (Reply 6):
Thanks for the comments thus far... Its a bit late at night here in MEL to start making any changes

Montey,
here in Venice is not so late to give some advice. Sun is shining outside on what seems to be...the first spring season afternoon !  Wink
Regarding the "3 holer" shot. Looks very nice but the truck is just in front of the nose. Hence : motive rejection....  Sad

Ciao



Life sucks. Then you die. Live fast, die young.
User currently offlineMonteycarlos From Australia, joined Mar 2005, 2107 posts, RR: 28
Reply 9, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 4028 times:

Quoting DC10Tim (Reply 7):
The 727 shot looks good in the low sunlight, but I think the tug and ramp guy might mean a 'motive' rejection.



Quoting LIPH (Reply 8):
Regarding the "3 holer" shot. Looks very nice but the truck is just in front of the nose. Hence : motive rejection

Yeah, as I thought it was a pretty awkward type of shot and sadly the only one I could really capture before other objects got in the way. How is the colour cast though? Does it seem ok?

I've just got up so I will rework the shots and try to repost them here. Thanks for the helpful feedback!

Carl



It's a beautiful night to fly like a phoenix...
User currently offlineMonteycarlos From Australia, joined Mar 2005, 2107 posts, RR: 28
Reply 10, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 4007 times:

Quoting ThierryD (Reply 1):
- Emirates: superb background lighting; 2 main issues though: plane is dark and a little soft. With some shadow-highlight and USM you might be able to save it though

Hey Thierry, thanks for the advice. I have a few questions though. I am in the middle of trying to re-do all these shots and the techniques I am using don't seem to be working. Do you think with this EK A345 shot that I am best using the shadow-highlights tool or perhaps going with the curves tool and adjusting it that way?

Quoting ThierryD (Reply 1):
- VirginBlue: needs around 02°CW roation (I know it's peanuts but screeners have been pretty picky concerning levelling as of late) and some selective sharpening (nose and tail need some more but take care not to sharpen the area around the engine nacelles even more as there are already small jaggies)

The rotation is fine... I'll have to start back with the original image so as not to crop out the person or the horizontal stabiliser. How is the best way to selective sharpen the nose and tail? I generally use the wand to do the aircraft as a whole but how is it possible to sharpen only those areas without making it too noticeable?

Quoting ThierryD (Reply 1):
- Malaysian: definitely not a distance problem as you include the whole wingspan and thus entirely fill the frame with the aircraft. The fuselage could use a little more sharpening though.

Cool... I guess if you can give me a way to do it with the DJ shot that it will work equally well on the MH fuselage.

Thanks a heap for the input!

Carl



It's a beautiful night to fly like a phoenix...
User currently offlineMonteycarlos From Australia, joined Mar 2005, 2107 posts, RR: 28
Reply 11, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 3976 times:

I have a couple more folks...

Could I possibly ear-mark any of these for future upload?


MyAviation.net photo:
Click here for bigger photo!
Photo © Carl J Maroney
MyAviation.net photo:
Click here for bigger photo!
Photo © Carl J Maroney



MyAviation.net photo:
Click here for bigger photo!
Photo © Carl J Maroney



MyAviation.net photo:
Click here for bigger photo!
Photo © Carl J Maroney



MyAviation.net photo:
Click here for bigger photo!
Photo © Carl J Maroney



My initial thoughts are:

1. Soft (if not blurry) plus dark
2. Colour cast might be off (again my colour vision might be a problem) + Soft nose and tail?
3. Aircraft is dark, and possibly needs shadow/highlights to be salvaged. However it is also soft.
4. Seems ok to me but could maybe use another shot of USM and some shadow/highlights?
5. Perhaps the least likely of this batch. Clutter +crop are awkward, low light, soft and possibly dark?

Please let me know your thoughts all!

Regards,

Carl



It's a beautiful night to fly like a phoenix...
User currently offlineThierryD From Luxembourg, joined Dec 2005, 2070 posts, RR: 51
Reply 12, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 3976 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SUPPORT

Quoting Monteycarlos (Reply 10):
Do you think with this EK A345 shot that I am best using the shadow-highlights tool or perhaps going with the curves tool and adjusting it that way?

Since you'd only wanna brighten up the aircraft and not the background the shadow/highlight tool would be the better option; take care though not to overuse it.

Quoting Monteycarlos (Reply 10):
How is the best way to selective sharpen the nose and tail?

By using layer masks; you make a duplicate layer, sharpen the whole picture as required, then you put a hiding mask on it and with the brush tool you remove the mask (thus sharpening the underneath lying area) where required.

Quoting Monteycarlos (Reply 10):
I guess if you can give me a way to do it with the DJ shot that it will work equally well on the MH fuselage.

 checkmark 


Your B727 photo is a real beauty but as the others have already said, the vehicle blocking the nose will give it a 100% motive rejection.  Sad

Thierry



"Go ahead...make my day"
User currently offlineThierryD From Luxembourg, joined Dec 2005, 2070 posts, RR: 51
Reply 13, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 3971 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SUPPORT

Quoting Monteycarlos (Reply 11):
Could I possibly ear-mark any of these for future upload?

2 Malaysian photos:
- blurry, lacking overall quality and dark; no way to save those for A.net
- Virgin: could use a little more sharpening and lighting; nose is somewhat blurry; with already 44 shots in the db I doubt its chances of acceptance
- Qantas: same story as with the Emirates picture
- Australian Air Express: a little dark and oversharpened (apparent jaggies); although no part of the plane is really blocked by anything it might fall under motive rejection as the picture is pretty cluttered on the right side. But if you don't care too much about acceptance ratio you could give it a try.

A little guide that might help you with your self-screening:
http://planecatcher.com/IGRR.htm

Cheers,

Thierry



"Go ahead...make my day"
User currently offlinePtrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 3944 posts, RR: 18
Reply 14, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 3970 times:

Quoting ThierryD (Reply 12):
Since you'd only wanna brighten up the aircraft and not the background the shadow/highlight tool would be the better option;

How would that only affect the aircraft, without deselecting the background? I don't see the difference with the curve.

Peter Smile



The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
User currently offlineLIPH From Italy, joined May 2004, 848 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 3967 times:

Quoting Monteycarlos (Reply 11):
Please let me know your thoughts all!

Montey,
- Malasyan looks oversaharpened and lacks in quality.
- Virgin looks a bit sfot and somewhat blurry
- Quantas is a very nice shot, but the a/c is in clear backlit and moreover it is blurry/soft
- The 727 one looks to me the more promising one, altough oversharpened....

Ciao



Life sucks. Then you die. Live fast, die young.
User currently offlineMonteycarlos From Australia, joined Mar 2005, 2107 posts, RR: 28
Reply 16, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 3966 times:

Quoting ThierryD (Reply 13):
- blurry, lacking overall quality and dark; no way to save those for A.net

As suspected... the light on this night was much lower due to higher cloud coverage and I really didn't hold any high hopes for these shots. I was kind of hoping by some miracle the one of 9M-MPO with the beacon lit might be ok but I concur in that it's probably not salvageable.

Quoting ThierryD (Reply 13):
- Virgin: could use a little more sharpening and lighting; nose is somewhat blurry; with already 44 shots in the db I doubt its chances of acceptance

Not worth the trouble...

Quoting ThierryD (Reply 13):
- Qantas: same story as with the Emirates picture

Might mark it down for some further work in the future then... I'll keep shooting in the meantime.

Quoting ThierryD (Reply 13):
- Australian Air Express: a little dark and oversharpened (apparent jaggies); although no part of the plane is really blocked by anything it might fall under motive rejection as the picture is pretty cluttered on the right side. But if you don't care too much about acceptance ratio you could give it a try.

Again, maybe not worth the effort. Don't really mind the acceptance ratio at the moment. I'm on a steep learning curve in trying to take shots that are worthy of the high views this site gets. If this shot isn't up to standard, then I am better off trying to work on other shots. It might be beneficial to work on it though to get a greater knowledge of photoshop.

Quoting ThierryD (Reply 13):
A little guide that might help you with your self-screening:
http://planecatcher.com/IGRR.htm

I've seen it many times and it is wonderful. I must thank you very much for posting it! Given my acceptance ratio be sure that I have read it many, many times!  Wink



It's a beautiful night to fly like a phoenix...
User currently offlineThierryD From Luxembourg, joined Dec 2005, 2070 posts, RR: 51
Reply 17, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 3956 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SUPPORT

Quoting Ptrjong (Reply 14):
How would that only affect the aircraft, without deselecting the background? I don't see the difference with the curve.

Since with the S/H tool you don't have to select anything; the software recognizes the brigher versus the darker areas and thus only works on the intended ones. In my opinion it's a much cleaner tool if used properly on those kind of photos.

Here's what I came up with (only a very quick edit!):
Big version: Width: 1024 Height: 695 File size: 597kb
S/H tool


Thierry



"Go ahead...make my day"
User currently offlinePtrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 3944 posts, RR: 18
Reply 18, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 3951 times:

Quoting ThierryD (Reply 17):

Thanks. It does tend to create banding in the sky, at least when used too coarsely.



The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
User currently offlineMonteycarlos From Australia, joined Mar 2005, 2107 posts, RR: 28
Reply 19, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 3923 times:

Ok folks, I have done some editing on the ones that might have some potential and I was hoping to hear what you guys think of them....

EK A345 - have added another kick of USM, as well as shadows/highlights (50% highlights and a small dash of shadows to match)

http://www.airliners.net/uf/view.fil...9293&filename=1173222333hHYhZJ.jpg

DJ 737 - rotated to be level, extra USM in areas and I think I have it a bit lower in the frame now.

http://www.airliners.net/uf/view.fil...9293&filename=1173222521qfAqQW.jpg

I will not bother with any of the other shots for now unless anyone thinks I should.

Thanks,

Carl



It's a beautiful night to fly like a phoenix...
User currently offlineLOCsta From United States of America, joined Sep 2006, 306 posts, RR: 8
Reply 20, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 3917 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I like this shot, but will probably get a level rejection.
Here it is with 1.36 CCW



Missed 4 chasing 1
User currently offlineMonteycarlos From Australia, joined Mar 2005, 2107 posts, RR: 28
Reply 21, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 3911 times:

Quoting LOCsta (Reply 20):
I like this shot, but will probably get a level rejection.
Here it is with 1.36 CCW

What was your reference point for the levelling? I'd have to start with a new canvas.



It's a beautiful night to fly like a phoenix...
User currently offlineLOCsta From United States of America, joined Sep 2006, 306 posts, RR: 8
Reply 22, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 3905 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Monteycarlos (Reply 21):
What was your reference point for the levelling? I'd have to start with a new canvas.

The horizon of the runway, but nobody else mentioned it so maybe its just me?



Missed 4 chasing 1
User currently offlineMonteycarlos From Australia, joined Mar 2005, 2107 posts, RR: 28
Reply 23, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 3902 times:

Quoting LOCsta (Reply 22):
The horizon of the runway, but nobody else mentioned it so maybe its just me?

It was mentioned earlier by LIPH but I don't think I corrected it... I suspect you're right with about 1.4CCW. It will be touch and go with cropping but hopefully it works out.

I find levelling quite difficult in general. For example, if I use the runway as a point, it will be technically level yet the plane and taxiway will appear unlevel due to the angle of the camera and the level of the ground being different. However if I use the taxiway, then the runway will be out and equally as noticeable. How do people usually overcome problems like this?



It's a beautiful night to fly like a phoenix...
User currently offlineMonteycarlos From Australia, joined Mar 2005, 2107 posts, RR: 28
Reply 24, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 3900 times:

Ok... EK A345 re-edited... Now has USM fix, CCW rotation and shadow/highlights.

I suspect it now has some jaggies... Any easy way to check for this. I need a better monitor!!!

http://www.airliners.net/uf/536889293/1173241196J12wRT.jpg



It's a beautiful night to fly like a phoenix...
25 Aussie18 : Yes it is quite jaggy around nose and cockpit of aircraft,also emirates titling. But the crop looks way to tight on the nose,almost cropped on nose a
26 Post contains links and images LOCsta : great job Carl! View Large View MediumPhoto © Carl J Maroney
27 Post contains images Monteycarlos : Thanks very much for your help with it!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Would Like To Have Advice On This posted Fri Nov 24 2006 13:21:09 by BaldurSveins
Advice On 100th Upload posted Sat Oct 15 2005 04:03:42 by N864DA
Advice On An Upload posted Sun Aug 28 2005 02:10:13 by DC10Tim
A Little Advice On An Upload posted Sat Jul 16 2005 19:53:57 by DC10Tim
I Need Advice On What Camera To Get posted Sat Sep 8 2001 15:21:45 by SafetyDude
Advice On Whether To Attempt Upload posted Mon Mar 5 2007 07:39:42 by Monteycarlos
Advice On Rejection posted Sun Feb 18 2007 04:04:48 by Preelude
Advice On These. posted Mon Jan 15 2007 05:16:35 by Aussie18
Advice On Center? posted Sun Dec 24 2006 17:45:08 by Psyops
Need Advice On A Photo Sale. posted Thu Dec 21 2006 20:24:31 by GOCAPS16